Targeted and shotgun metagenomic approaches provide different descriptions of dryland soil microbial communities in a manipulated field study
Version of Record online: 10 FEB 2012
Published 2012. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Environmental Microbiology Reports
Volume 4, Issue 2, pages 248–256, April 2012
How to Cite
Steven, B., Gallegos-Graves, L. V., Starkenburg, S. R., Chain, P. S. and Kuske, C. R. (2012), Targeted and shotgun metagenomic approaches provide different descriptions of dryland soil microbial communities in a manipulated field study. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 4: 248–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2012.00328.x
- Issue online: 15 MAR 2012
- Version of Record online: 10 FEB 2012
- Received 22 July, 2011; revised 6 January, 2012; accepted 16 January, 2012.
Fig. S1. Differential identification of phylogenetic groups between datasets and classification methods. (A) Actinobacteria sequences. (B) Cyanobacteria sequences. (C) Proteobacteria sequences. Datasets: pyroSSU, pyrosequenced SSU rRNA genes; metaSSU, SSU rRNA genes parsed from the shotgun metagenomes; metaSEED, SEED classification of bulk shotgun metagenome sequences; metaTree, ML TreeMap classification of total metagenome sequences; metaMEGAN, MEGAN classification of total shotgun metagenome sequences.
Table S1. Sequence statistics for the different sequence datasets.
|EMI4_328_sm_TableS1.doc||32K||Supporting info item|
|EMI4_328_sm_FigureS1.pdf||1134K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.