The article is a shortened version of the 15th UN-WIDER Lecture delivered at Maputo, Mozambique on May 4th, 2011. I would like to thank Finn Tarp, director of WIDER, for the invitation to give this prestigious lecture, and Célestin Monga, Vandana Chandra, David Rosenblatt, Volker Treichel, and Doerte Doemeland for excellent support in preparing this lecture. Comments from two anonymous reviewers on a previous draft are gratefully acknowledged.
From Flying Geese To Leading Dragons: New Opportunities and Strategies for Structural Transformation in Developing Countries†
Article first published online: 1 MAY 2012
© 2012 London School of Economics and Political Science and John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Volume 3, Issue 4, pages 397–409, November 2012
How to Cite
Lin, J. Y. (2012), From Flying Geese To Leading Dragons: New Opportunities and Strategies for Structural Transformation in Developing Countries. Global Policy, 3: 397–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2012.00172.x
- Issue published online: 23 NOV 2012
- Article first published online: 1 MAY 2012
Economic development is a process of continuous industrial and technological upgrading in which any country, regardless of its level of development, can succeed if it develops industries that are consistent with its comparative advantage, determined by its endowment structure. The successful strategy for developing countries is to exploit the latecomer advantage by building up industries that are growing dynamically in more advanced, fast growing countries that have endowment structures similar to theirs. By following carefully selected lead countries, latecomers can emulate the leader follower, flying geese pattern that has served well in effectively catching up economies since the 18th century. The emergence of large middle income countries such as China, India, and Brazil as new growth poles in the world, and their dynamic growth and climbing of the industrial ladder, offer an unprecedented opportunity to all developing economies with income levels currently below theirs—including those in Sub-Saharan Africa. Having itself been a ‘follower goose’, China is on the verge of graduating from low skilled manufacturing jobs and becoming a ‘leading dragon’. That will free up nearly 100 million labor intensive manufacturing jobs, enough to more than quadruple manufacturing employment in low income countries. A similar trend is emerging in other middle income growth poles. The lower income countries that can formulate and implement a viable strategy to capture this new industrialization opportunity will set forth on a dynamic path of structural change that can lead to poverty reduction and prosperity.
- •Industrialization and structural change are the essence of economic development.
- •The best way for a developing country to achieve sustained, dynamic growth is to follow comparative advantage in its industrial development and to tap into the potential of advantages of backwardness in industrial upgrading.
- •The industrialization in successful catching up countries often proceeds in a leader follower, flying geese pattern.
- •The dynamic growth in China and other large emerging markets provide an unprecedented opportunity for the industrialization and dynamic growth in Africa and other low income countries.