URBAN WATER PRICING: PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVES AND CUSTOMER PREFERENCES

Authors

  • LIN CRASE,

    1. School of Business, La Trobe University, Albury-Wodonga
    Search for more papers by this author
  • SUE O'KEEFE,

    1. School of Business, La Trobe University, Albury-Wodonga
    Search for more papers by this author
  • BRIAN DOLLERY

    1. Department of Economics, University of New England
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Funding provided by the Consumer Utility Advocacy Centre is gratefully acknowledged. We are also grateful for the research assistance provided by Craig Heiner and Katherine O'Keefe. Views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily of CUAC.


Abstract

There is considerable variation between Australian jurisdictions in their approach to urban water and waste-water pricing. Regardless of the explicit commitments of signatories to the National Water Initiative to ‘best practice pricing’ in 2004, there are no obvious signs that a common and efficient pricing regime is emerging. This paper considers one of the dimensions of urban water tariffs: the split between ‘volumetric’ and ‘access’ charges. Given the practical difficulties of implementing a ‘first-best’ solution, the preferences of household consumers are explored using choice modelling. Results show that household consumers would prefer a tariff regime that embodies greater emphasis on volumetric charges. This approach would also be more attractive on economic grounds compared to current regimes, with their high access charges and fixed waste-water tariffs.

Ancillary