SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • APG III. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105121.
  • Borsch T, Quandt D. 2009. Mutational dynamics and phylogenetic utility of noncoding chloroplast DNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution 282: 169199.
  • Borsch T, Hilu W, Quandt D, Wilde V, Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. 2003. Non-coding plastid trnT-trnF sequences reveal a well resolved phylogeny of basal angiosperms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 558576.
  • Borsch T, Hilu KW, Wiersema JH, Löhne C, Barthlott W, Wilde V. 2007. Phylogeny of Nymphaea (Nymphaeaceae): Evidence from substitutions and microstructural changes in the chloroplast trnT-trnF region. International Journal of Plant Sciences 168: 639671.
  • Chase MW, Soltis DE, Olmstead RG, Morgan D, Les DH, Mishler BD, Duvall MR, Price RA, Hillis HG, Qiu Y-L, Kron KA, Rettig JH, Conti E, Palmer J, Manhart JR, Sytsma KJ, Michaels HJ, Kress WJ, Karol KG, Clark WD, Hedren M, Gaut BS, Jansen RK, Kim KJ, Wimpee CF, Smith JF, Furnier GR, Strauss SH, Xiang QY, Plunkett GM, Soltis PS, Swensen SM, Williams SE, Gadek PA, Quinn CJ, Eguiarte LE, Golenberg E, Learn GHJ, Graham SW, Barret SCH, Dayanandan S, Albert VA. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528580.
  • Donoghue MJ, Doyle JA. 1989. Phylogenetic analysis of angiosperms and the relationships of the Hamamelidae. In: Crane PR, Blackmore S eds. Evolution, systematics and phylogeny of the Hamamelidae. Oxford : Clarendon Press. 1745.
  • Downie SR, Katz-Downie D, Watson MF. 2000. A phylogeny of the flowering plant family Apiaceae based on chloroplast DNA rpl16 and rpoC1 intron sequences: Towards a suprageneric classification of subfamily Apioideae. American Journal of Botany 87: 273292.
  • Drinnan AN, Crane PR, Hoot SB. 1994. Patterns of the floral evolution in the early diversification of non-magnoliid dicotyledons (eudicots). Plant Systematics and Evolution Suppl 8: 93122.
  • Endress PK. 2010. Flower structure and trends of evolution in eudicots and their major subclades. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 97: 541583.
  • Endress PK. 2011. Evolutionary diversification of the flowers in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 98: 370396.
  • Graham SW, Olmstead RG. 2000. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 87: 17121730.
  • Graham SW, Reeves PA, Burns ACE, Olmstead RG. 2000. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: Interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 8396.
  • Hilu KW, Borsch T, Müller K, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Savolainen V, Chase MW, Powell MP, Alice LA, Evans R, Sauquet H, Neinhuis C, Slotta TAB, Rohwer JG, Campbell CS, Chatrou LW. 2003. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. American Journal of Botany 90: 17581776.
  • Hoot SB, Douglas AW. 1998. Phylogeny of the Proteaceae based on atpB and atpB-rbcL intergenic spacer region sequences. Australian Systematic Botany 11: 301320.
  • Hoot SB, Magallón S, Crane PR. 1999. Phylogeny of basal eudicots based on three molecular data sets: atpB, rbcL, and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86 : 132.
  • Jansen RK, Cai Z, Raubeson LA, Daniell H, DePamphilis CW, Leebens-Mack J, Müller KF, Guisinger-Bellian M, Haberle RC, Hansen AK, Chumley TW, Lee S-B, Peery R, McNeal JR, Kuehl JV, Boore JL. 2007. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 1936919374.
  • Kelchner SA. 2000. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 482498.
  • Kelchner SA. 2002. Group II introns as phylogenetic tools: Structure, function, and evolutionary constraints. American Journal of Botany 89: 16511669.
  • Kelchner SA, Clark LG. 1997. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the chloroplast rpl16 intron in Chusquea and the Bambusoideae (Poaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 8: 385397.
  • Kim S, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Zanis MJ, Suh Y. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships among early-diverging eudicots based on four genes: Were the eudicots ancestrally woody? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 1630.
  • Kubitzki K. 2007. Sabiaceae. In: Kubitzki K ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag. 413417.
  • Löhne C, Borsch T. 2005. Phylogenetic utility and molecular evolution of the petD group II intron in basal angiosperms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 317332.
  • Löhne C, Borsch T, Wiersema JH. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of Nymphaeales using fast-evolving and noncoding chloroplast markers. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 154: 141163.
  • Magallon S, Crane PR, Herendeen PS. 1999. Phylogenetic pattern, diversity, and diversification of eudicots. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 297372.
  • Moore MJ, Soltis PS, Bell CD, Burleigh JG, Soltis DE. 2010. Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107: 46234628.
  • Morrison DA. 2009. A framework for phylogenetic sequence alignment. Plant Systematics and Evolution 282: 127149.
  • Müller J, Müller K, Quandt D, Neinhuis C. 2005. PhyDE – Phylogenetic Data Editor, version 0.995 (online). Available from http://www.phyde.de [accessed 1 January 2010.
  • Müller K. 2004. PRAP – computation of Bremer support for large data sets. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 780782.
  • Müller K. 2005. SeqState – primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. Applied Bioinformatics 4: 6569.
  • Müller K, Bosch T. 2005a. Phylogenetics of Amaranthaceae based on matK/trnK sequence data – evidence from parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian analyses. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 92: 66102.
  • Müller K, Borsch T. 2005b. Phylogenetics of Utricularia (Lentibulariaceae) and molecular evolution of the trnK intron in a lineage with high substitutional rates. Plant Systematics and Evolution 250: 3967.
  • Müller KF, Borsch T, Hilu KW. 2006. Phylogenetic utility of rapidly evolving DNA at high taxonomical levels: Contrasting matK, trnT-F, and rbcL in basal angiosperms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41: 99117.
  • Nandi OI, Chase MW, Endress PK. 1998. Combined cladistic analysis of angiosperms using rbcL and non-molecular datasets. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 137212.
  • Nixon KC. 1999. The parsimony ratchet: A rapid means for analyzing large data sets. Cladistics 15: 407414.
  • Ochoterena H. 2009. Homology in coding and non-coding DNA sequences: A parsimony perspective. Plant Systematics and Evolution 282: 151168.
  • Qiu Y-L, Lee J, Bernasconi-Quadroni F, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Zanis M, Zimmer EA, Chen Z, Savolainen V, Chase MW. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: Evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402: 404407.
  • Qiu Y-L, Lee J, Bernasconi-Quadroni F, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Zanis M, Zimmer EA, Chen Z, Savolainen V, Chase MW. 2000. Phylogeny of basal angiosperms: Analyses of five genes from three genomes. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 327.
  • Qiu Y-L, Dombrowska O, Lee J, Li L, Whitlock BA, Bernasconi-Quadroni F, Rest JS, Davis CC, Borsch T, Hilu KW, Renner SS, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Zanis MJ, Cannone JJ, Gutell RR, Powell M, Savolainen V, Chatrou LW, Chase MW. 2005. Phylogenetic analyses of basal angiosperms based on nine plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear genes. International Journal of Plant Sciences 166: 815842.
  • Qiu Y-L, Li L, Wang B, Xue J-Y, Hendry TA, Li R-Q, Brown JW, Liu Y, Hudson GT, Chen Z-D. 2010. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from sequences of four mitochondrial genes. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 48: 391425.
  • Quandt D, Müller K, Stech M, Hilu KW, Frey W, Frahm JP, Borsch T. 2004. Molecular evolution of the chloroplast trnL-F region in land plants. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 98: 1337.
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2009. Tracer v1.5 (online). Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer [accessed 1 January 2010.
  • Ren Y, Li H-F, Zhao L, Endress PK. 2007. Floral morphogenesis in Euptelea (Eupteleaceae, Ranunculales). Annals of Botany 100: 185193.
  • Renner SS. 1999. Circumscription and phylogeny of the Laurales: Evidence from molecular and morphological data. American Journal of Botany 86: 13011315.
  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 15721574.
  • Sauquet H, Doyle JA, Scharaschkin T, Borsch T, Hilu KW, Chatrou LW, Le Thomas A. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of Magnoliales and Myristicaceae based on multiple data sets: Implications for character evolution. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 125186.
  • Savolainen V, Chase MW, Hoot SB, Morton CM, Soltis DE, Bayer C, Fay MF, De Bruijn AY, Sullivan S, Qiu Y-L. 2000. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Systematic Biology 49: 306362.
  • Shimodaira H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Systematic Biology 51: 492508.
  • Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 2001. CONSEL: For assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17: 12461247.
  • Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369381.
  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Chase MW, Mort ME, Albach DC, Zanis M, Savolainen V, Hahn WH, Hoot SB, Fay MF, Axtell M, Swensen SM, Prince LM, Kress WJ, Nixon KC, Farris JS. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 381461.
  • Soltis DE, Senters AE, Zanis MJ, Kim S, Thompson JD, Soltis PS, Ronse De Craene LP, Endress PK, Farris JS. 2003. Gunnerales are sister to other core eudicots: implications for the evolution of pentamery. American Journal of Botany 90: 461470.
  • Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 26882690.
  • Steele KP, Vilgalys R. 1994. Phylogenetic analyses of Polemoniaceae using nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene matK. Systematic Botany 19: 126142.
  • Stöver B, Müller KF. 2010. TreeGraph2: Combining and visualizing evidence from different phylogenetic analyses. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 7.
  • Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sunderland : Sinauer Associates.
  • Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of the chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 11051109.
  • Wang W, Lu A-M, Endress ME, Chen ZD. 2009. Phylogeny and classification of Ranunculales: Evidence from four molecular loci and morphological data. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 11: 81110.
  • Wanke S, Jaramillo MA, Borsch T, Samain MS, Quandt D, Neinhuis C. 2007. Evolution of Piperales –matK gene and trnK intron sequence data reveal lineage specific resolution contrast. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 42: 477497.
  • Wicke S, Quandt D. 2009. Universal primers for amplification of the trnK/matK-psbA region in land plants. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 66: 285288.
  • Worberg A, Quandt D, Barniske A-M, Löhne C, Hilu KW, Borsch T. 2007. Phylogeny of basal eudicots: Insights from non-coding and rapidly evolving DNA. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 7: 5577.