SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:619626.
  • 2
    Qualtrough AJE, Wilson NHF, Smith GA. The porcelain inlay: A historical view. Open Dent 1990; 15:6170.
  • 3
    Kelly JR, Nishimura I., Campbell SD. Ceramics in density: Historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75:1832.
  • 4
    Ironside JG. Alternative to amalgam - the role of bonded porcelain. N Z Dent J 1991; 87:4648.
  • 5
    Bergman M.. Side-effect of amalgam and its alternatives: local, systematic and environmental. Int Dent J 1990; 40:410.
  • 6
    Christensen GJ. Tooth-colored inlays and onlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; 117:Spec Iss:12E–17E.
  • 7
    Noack MJ, Routlet J-F. Tooth-colored inlays. Curr Opin Dent 1991; 1:172178.
  • 8
    Tyas MJ. Dental amalgam - what are the alternatives? Int Dent J 1994; 44:303308.
  • 9
    Rykke M.. Dental materials for posterior restorations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992; 8:139148.
  • 10
    Baumann MA, Heidemann D.. Biocompatibility of dental inlay ceramics. In: Mörmann WH, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations: states of the Art of the Cerec Method. Berlin : Quintessence Verlag, 1991: 373376.
  • 11
    Rosenblum MA, Schulman A.. A review of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128:297307.
  • 12
    Milleding P., Örtengren U., Karlsson S.. Ceramic inlay systems: some clinical aspects. J Oral Rehavil 1995; 22:571580.
  • 13
    Thordrup M., Isidor F., Hörsted-Bindslev P.. A one-year clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays. Scand J Dent Res 1994; 102:186192.
  • 14
    Kerschbaum T.. Quality assurance in CEREC restorations. In: Mörmann WH, ed. CAD/CIM in aesthetic density. CEREC 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. Berlin : Quintessence, 1996: 321333.
  • 15
    Jokstad A., Mjör IA, Frazier KB. The teaching of all-ceramic restorations in Scandinavian dental schools: A survey. Acta Odontol Scand 1996; 54:200204.
  • 16
    Wilson NHF, Qualtrough AJE, Mjör IA. All-ceramic restorations: Teaching in UK and Irish dental schools. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1996; 4:1519.
  • 17
    Frazier KB, Mjör IA. The teaching of all-ceramic restorations in North American dental schools: Materials and techniques employed. J Esthet Dent 1997; 9:8693.
  • 18
    Kawai K., Hayashi M., Torii M., Tsuchitani Y.. Marginal adaptability and fit of ceramic milled inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126:14141419.
  • 19
    Kawai K., Isenberg KF, Leinfelder KF. Effects of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:5358.
  • 20
    Krejci I., Lutz F., Reimer M.. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent 1993; 21:3946.
  • 21
    Molin M., Karlsson S.. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlays systems: A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51:201206.
  • 22
    O'Neal SJ, Miracle RL, Leinfelder KF. Evaluating interfacial gaps for esthetic inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124:4854.
  • 23
    Siervo S., Pampalone A., Siervo P., Siervo R.. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:773779.
  • 24
    Sjögren G.. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting: An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53:2428.
  • 25
    Sorenson JA, Munksgaard EC. Relative gap formation of resincemented ceramic inlays and dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76:374378.
  • 26
    Sorenson JA, Munksgaard EC. Relative gap formation of adjacent to ceramic inlays with combinations of resin cements and dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76:472476.
  • 27
    Thordrup M., Isidor F., Hörsted-Bindslev P.. Combination of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent 1994; 22:147153.
  • 28
    Sturdevant JR, Heymann HO, Wilder AD, Roberson TM, Bayne SC. Composite cement thickness of CEREC CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 1991; 70:296:Abstr 245.
  • 29
    Brandestini M., Mörmann WH, Lutz F., Krejci I.. Computer machined ceramic inlays: in vitro marginal adaptation. J Dent Res 1985; 64:208:Abstr 305.
  • 30
    Geppert W., Roulet J-F, Berlin FU. In vitro marginal integrity of MOD Dicor inlays luted with adhesive techniques. J Dent Res 1986; 65:731:Abstr 48.
  • 31
    Heinzmann J-L, Krejci I., Lutz. Wear and marginal adaptation of glass-ceramic inlays, amalgam, and enamel. J Dent Res 1990; 69:161:Abstr 423.
  • 32
    Peters A., Bieniek KW. SEM-examination of the marginal adaptation of computer machined ceramic restorations. In: Mörmann WH, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Berlin : Quintessence Verlag, 1991: 365371.
  • 33
    Mörmann WH, Schug J.. Grinding precision and a accuracy of fit of CEREC 2 CAD-CIM inlays. J Am Dent Assos 1997; 128:4753.
  • 34
    Karaagaclioglu L., Zaimoglu A., Akoren AC. Microleakage of indirect inlays placed on different kinds of glass ionomer cement linings. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 19:457469.
  • 35
    LoPresti JT, David S., Calamia JR. Microleakage of CAD-CAM porcelain restorations. Am J Dent 1996; 9:3739.
  • 36
    Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Avera SP. Porcelain-composite interface micoleakage with various porelain surface treatments. Dent Mater 1991; 7:118123.
  • 37
    Isenberg BP, Essig ME, Beaudreau RW, Teixeira LC. Microleakage evolution of Cere CAD/CAM inlays. J Dent Res 1993; 72:114:Abstr 91.
  • 38
    Lacy AM, Zhang K., Koh A., Wiltshire WA, Wantanabe L.. Marginal microleakage around C1 II resin and Dictor inlays. J Dent Res 1990; 196:Abstr 669.
  • 39
    Dietschi D., Maeder M., Meyer J-M, Holz J.. in vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 1990; 21:823831.
  • 40
    Bergmann P., Noack MJ, Roulet J-F. Marginal adaptation with glass-ceramic inlays adhesively luted with glycerine gel. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:739744.
  • 41
    Dérand T.. Stress analysis of cemented or resin-bonded loaded porcelain inlays. Dent Mater 1991; 7:2124.
  • 42
    Jacobsen PH, Rees JS. Luting agents for ceramic and polymeric inlays and onlays. Int Dent J 1992; 42:145149.
  • 43
    Peutzfeldt A.. Dual-cure resin cements: in vitro wear and effects of quantity of remaining double bonds, filler volume, and light curing. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53:2934.
  • 44
    Noack MJ, Locke LS, Roulet J-F. Marginal adaptation of porcelain inlays luted with different composite materials. J Dent Res 1990; 69:161:Abstr 421.
  • 45
    Zuellig R., Bryant R.. Two year evaluation of Cerec restorations: Influence of luting agent. J Dent Res 1995; 74:405:Abstr 34.
  • 46
    DeLong R., Sasik C., Pintado MR, Douglas WH. The wear of enamel when opposed by ceramic systems. Dent Mater 1989; 5:266271.
  • 47
    Krejci I., Lutz F., Reimer M.. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: Restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:199207.
  • 48
    Krejci I.. Wear of Cerec and other restoractive materials. In: Mörmann WH, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Berlin : Quintessence Verlag, 1991: 245251.
  • 49
    Frazier KB, Sarrett DC. Wear resistance of dual-cured resin luting agents. Am J Dent 1995; 8:161164.
  • 50
    Ujigo Y., Torii Y., Inoue K.. Filler content versus wear of resin cement around CAD/CAM inlays. J Dent Res 1994; 73:325: Abstr 1787.
  • 51
    Peutzfeldt A.. Effect of the ultrasonic insertion technique on the seating of composite inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52:5154.
  • 52
    Noack MJ, Roulet J-F, Bergmann P.. A new method to lute tooth colored inlays with highly filled composite resins. J Dent 1991; 70:45: Abstr 1528.
  • 53
    Sjögren G., Johansson K.. Charges extracted from dental ceramics: An indication of piezoelectric activity? Acta Odontol Scand 1996; 54:205210.
  • 54
    Sjögren G., Bergman M., Johansson K.. Piezoelectricity in dental materials, a conceivable casuse of postrestoractive sensitivity. Acta Odontol Scand 1992; 50:313319.
  • 55
    EI-Mowafy OM, Brown JW, McComb D.. Radiocapacity of direct ceramic inlays restoratives. J Dent Res 1991; 70:296:Abstr 248.
  • 56
    Lambrechts P. Inokoshi S., Van Meerbeek B., Willems G., Braem M., Vanherle G.. Classification and potential of composite luting materials. In Mörmann WH, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Berlin : Quintessence Verlag, 1991: 6190.
  • 57
    Magne P., Dietschi D., Holz J.. Esthetic restorations for posterior teeth: Practical and clinical considerations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996; 16:105119.
  • 58
    Piddock V., Qualtrough AJE. Dental ceramics—an update. J Dent 1990; 18:227235.
  • 59
    Sjögren G., Bergman M., Molin M., Bessing C. A. Clinical examination of ceramic (Cerec) inlays. Acts Odontol Scand 1992; 50:171178.
  • 60
    Seghin RR, Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF. Relative fracture toughness and hardness of new dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74:145150.
  • 61
    Anusavice KJ. Dental ceramics. In:Anusavie KJ, ed. Phillips' science of dental materials. 10th edn. Philadelphia : WB Saunders, 1996:583618.
  • 62
    Nathanson D.. Principles of porcelain use as an inlay/onlay material. In: Garber DA, Goldstein RE, eds. Porcelain & composite inlays: Esthetic posterior restorations. Chicago : Quintessence, 1994: 3237.
  • 63
    Fett HP, Mörmann WH, Krejci I., Lutz F.. The effects of short bevels and silanization on marginal adaptation of computer-machined mesio-occlusodistal inlays. Quintessenc Int 1991; 22:823829.
  • 64
    Lu R., Harcourt JK, Tyas MJ, Alexander B.. An investigation of the composite resin/porcelain interface. Aust Dent J 1992; 37:1219.
  • 65
    Roulet J-F, Soderholm K-JM. Variables influencing the bond strength of ceramic-resin interfaces. J Dent Res 1991; 70:434:Abstr 1348.
  • 66
    Nathanson D.. Factors in optimizing the strength of boned ceramic restorations. In: Mörmann WH, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Berlin : Quintessence Verlag, 1991; 5159.
  • 67
    Aberg C., van Dijken JWV, Olofsson A-L. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemeted with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52:140149.
  • 68
    Mörmann WH, Krejci I.. Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in site: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int 1992; 23:109115.
  • 69
    Mörmann WH, Krejci I.. Clinical and SEM evaluation of Cerec inlays after 5 years in situ: In: Mörmann WH, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Berlin : Quintessence Verlag, 1991; 2532.
  • 70
    Krejci I., Krejci D., Lutz F.. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence Int 1992; 23:181186.
  • 71
    Friedl K-H, Schmaltz G., Hiller K-A, Saller A.. In-vivo evaluation of a feldspathic ceramic system: 2-year results. J Dent 1996; 24:2531.
  • 72
    Thonemann B., Federlin M., Schmalz G., Schams A.. Clinical evaluation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic inlays in vivo: 2-year results. Clin Oral Invest 1997; 1:2724.
  • 73
    Gladys S., Van Meerbeck B., Inokoshi S., et al Clinical evaluation and semi quantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlays systems at 3 years. J Dent 1995; 23:329338.
  • 74
    Qualtrough AJE, Wilson NHF, Smith GA. An evaluation of the use of porcelain inlays in premolar and permanent molar teeth. J Dent Res 1988; 67:674:Abstr 275.
  • 75
    Van Meerbeek B., Inokishi S., Willens G., et al. Marginal adaptaion of four tooth-coloured inlay system in vivo. J Dent 1992; 20:1826.
  • 76
    Isidor F., Brødum K.. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74:140144.
  • 77
    Walther W., Reiss B.. Six year survival analysis of Cerec restorations in a private practive. In: Mörmann WH, ed. CAD/CIM in aesthetic density. CEREC 10 Year Anniverseary Symposium. Berlin : Quintessence, 1996: 199204.
  • 78
    Noack MJ, Rouler J-F. Survival rates and mode of failure of Dicor inlays after 4 years. J Dent Res 1994; 73:196:Abstr 759.
  • 79
    Haas M., Arnetzl G., Pertl C., Polansky R., Smetan M.. CEREC vs laboratory inlays. In: Mörmann WH, ed. CAD/CIM in aesthetic density. CEREC 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. Berlin Quintessence, 1996; 299312.
  • 80
    Mjör IA, Jokstad A., Ovist V.. Longevity of posterior restorations. Int Dent J 1990; 40:1117.
  • 81
    Stenberg R., Matsson L.. Clinical evaluation of glass ceramic inlays (Dicor). Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51:9197.
  • 81
    Stenberg R., Matsson journalL.. Clinical evaluation of glass ceramic inlays (Dicor). Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51:9197.
  • 82
    Qualtrough AJE, Wilson NHF. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a porcelain inlay system. J Dent 1996; 24:317323.
  • 83
    Mörmann WH, Götsch T., Krejci I., Lutz F., Barbakow F.. Clinical status of 94 Cerec ceramic inlays after 3 years in situ. In: Mörmann WH, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Berlin : Quintessence Verlag, 1991: 355363.
  • 84
    Höglund C., van Dijken J., Olofsson A-L. A clinical evaluation of adhesively luted ceramic inlays—A two year follow-up study. Swed Detn J 1992; 16:169171.
  • 85
    Tidenhag P., Gunne J.. A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8:456460.
  • 86
    Qualtrough AJE, Wilson NHF, Smith GA. An assessment of a porcelain inlay system - Initial findings. J Dent Res 1989; 68:960:Abstr 749.
  • 87
    Molin M., Karlsson S.. A 3-year clinical follow-up study of a ceramic (Optec) inlay system. Acta Odontol Scand 1996; 54:145149.
  • 88
    Bieniek KW, Peters A.. Clinical evaluation of ceramic restorations machined by a CAD/CAM technique. In: Mörmann WH, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Berlin : Quintessence Verlag, 1991: 327335.
  • 89
    Wat P., Cheung GSP. Incidence of post-operative sensitivity following indirect porcelain onlay restorations: Preliminary results. Asian J Aesthet Dent 1995; 3:37.
  • 90
    Heymann HO, Wilder AD, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM, Bayne SC. 2-year clinical performance of Cerec CAD/CAM-generated MGC Inlays. J Dent Res 1992; 71:207:Abstr 814.
  • 91
    Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM generated ceramic inlays - a four-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:11711181.
  • 92
    Haller B., Hofmann N.. Postrestorative sensitivity: Mechanisms and prevention. In: Mörmann WH, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Berlin : Quintessence Verlag, 1991: 127139.
  • 93
    Felton DA, Bergenholtz G., Kanoy BE. Evaluation of the desensitizing effect of Gluman Dentin Bond on teeth prepared for complete-coverage restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1991; 4:292298.
  • 94
    Taleghani M., Leinfelder KF. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct procelain bonded inlays. J Dent Res 1989; 68:249:Abstr 546.
  • 95
    Christensen GJ, Brown TA, Babb R.. Accuracy of fit of direct-firing porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1969; 22:4653.
  • 96
    Dietschi D., Maeder M., Holz J.. In vitro evluation of marginal fit and morphology of fired ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 1992; 23:271278.
  • 97
    Sewitch T.. Resin-bonded metal-ceramic inlays: A new approach. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78:408411.
  • 98
    Thordrup M., Isidor F., Horsted-Bindslev P.. Cerec or laboratory ceramic inlay? In: Mörmann WH, ed. Proceedings of the Intemational Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Berlin : Quintessence Verlag, 1991: 91101.
  • 99
    Hickel R., Dasch W., Mehl A., Kremers L.. CAD/CAM - Fillings of the future? Int Dent J 1997; 47:247258.
  • 100
    Shyearer AC, Heymann HO, Wilson NHF. Two ceramic materials compared for the production of CEREC inlays. J Dent 1993; 21:302304.
  • 101
    Inokoshi S., Van Meerbeek B., Willems G., Lambrechts P., Braem M., Vanherle G.. Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original and the updated software. J Dent 1992; 20:171177.
  • 102
    Pallesen U.. Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations: 6-yaer report. In: Mörmann WH, ed. CAD/CAM in aesthetic dentistry. CEREC 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. Berlin : Quintessence, 1996: 241253.
  • 103
    Kanzler R., Roulet J-F. Margin quality and longevity in vivo of sintered ceramic inlays luted with adhesive techiniques. In: Mörmann WH, ed. CAD/CAM in aesthetic dentistry. CEREC 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. 537552.
  • 104
    Roulet J-F, Kanzler R.. Longevity and margin quality of adhesively luted sintered ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 1996; 75:147:Abstr 1037.
  • 105
    Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Baylis MA, Grundy JR. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2:217223.
  • 106
    Roulet J-F, Noack MJ. Tooth colored conventional and Cerec restorations - Claim and reality. In: Mörmann WH, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Berlin : Quintessence Verlag, 1991: 223243.
  • 107
    Hannig M., Schmeiser R.. Esthetic posterior restorations utilizing the double inlay technique: A novel approach in esthetic dentistry. Quintessence Int 1997; 28:7983.
  • 108
    Anusavice KJ. Dental cements for bonding applications. In: Anusavice KJ, ed. Phillips' science of dental materials. 10th edn. Philadelphia : WB Sauders, 1996: 581.
  • 109
    Isenberg BP, Essig ME, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of marginal integrity: two year results. In: Mörmann WH, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Berlin : Quintessence Verlag, 1991: 163172.
  • 110
    Essig ME, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder DF, Mueninghoff LA. An invivo evaluation of duo-cured cements with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 1991; 70:296:Abstr 244.
  • 111
    Dahl BJ, øilo G.. In vivo wear ranking of some restorative materials. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:561565.
  • 112
    Christensen R., Christensen G., Vogi S., Bangerter V.. 2 year clinical comparison of 6 inlay systems. J Dent Res 1991; 70:561:Abstr 2360.
  • 113
    Jensen ME. A two-year clinical study of posterior etched-porcelain resin-bonded restorations. Am J Dent 1988; 1:2733.
  • 114
    Bessing C., Molin M.. An in vivo study of glass ceramic (Dicor) inlays. Preliminary report. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48:351357.
  • 115
    Molin M., Karlsson S.. A clinical evaluation of the Optec inlay system. Acta Odontol Scand 1992; 50:227233.
  • 116
    Fradeani M., Aquilano A., Bassein L.. Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half years. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78:346353.
  • 117
    Hars E.. CEREC in X-ray. In: Mörmann WH, ed. CAD/CAM in aesthetic dentistry. CEREC 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. Berlin : Quintessence, 1996: 653657.
  • 118
    Taleghani M., Leinfekler KR, Lane J.. Posterior porcelain bonded inlays. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1987; 8:410418.
  • 119
    Garber DA, Goldstein RE. Tooth preparation. In: Garber DA, Goldstein RE, eds. Porcelain & composite inlays & onlays: Esthetic posterior restorations. Chicago : Quintessence, 1994: 3855.
  • 120
    Karapetian VE, Sorg T., Jöckel V., Baumann MA. Comparison of different polishing systems for dental inlay ceramics. In: Mörmann WH, ed. CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry. CEREC 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. Berlin : Quintessence, 1996: 553559.
  • 121
    Haywood VB, Heymann HO, Scurria MS. Effects of water, speed, and experimental instrumentation on finishing and polishing porcelain intra-orally. Dent Mater 1989; 5:185188.
  • 122
    Stoll R., Seitner T., Schulte A., Stachniss V.. The use of polishing systems on the surface of different ceramic materials. In: Mörmann WH, ed. CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry. CEREC 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. Berlin : Quintessence, 1996: 589597.
  • 123
    Huerzeler MB, Fett H., Mörmann W.. Marginal adaptation of Cerec-CAD-CAM inlays after 3.5 years. In: Mörmann WH, ed. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations: State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Berlin : Quintessence Verlag, 1991: 417423.
  • 124
    Brauner AW, Bieniek KW. Seven years of clinical experience with the CEREC inlay system. In: Mörmann WH, ed. CAD/CAM in aesthetic dentistry. CEREC 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. Berlin : Quintessence, 1996: 217228.
  • 125
    Berg NG, Dérand T.. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec). Swed Dent J 1997; 21:121127.
  • 126
    Studer S., Lehner C., Scharer P.. Glass-ceramic inlays and onlays made by IPS-Empress: First clinical results. J Dent Res 1992; 71:658:Abstr 1144.
  • 127
    Roulet J-F. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam - results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Invest 1997; 1:4046.
  • 128
    Goetsch T., Mörmann W., Krejci I., Lutz F.. Cerec ceramic inlays clinically assessed using modified USPHS criteria. J Dent Res 1990; 69:162:Abstr 425.