SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Chan DC, Browning WD, Pohjola R, Hackman S, Myers ML. Predictors of non-carious loss of cervical tooth tissues. Oper Dent 2006;31:8488.
  • 2
    Reis A, Loguercio AD. A 24-month follow-up of flowable resin composite as an intermediate layer in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2006;31:523529.
  • 3
    Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994;22:195207.
  • 4
    Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215235.
  • 5
    Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21:1724.
  • 6
    Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, et al. Restoring cervical lesions with flexible composites. Dent Mater 2007;23:749754.
  • 7
    Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864881.
  • 8
    Ishikawa A, Shimada Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Micro-tensile and micro-shear bond strengths of current self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2007;20:161166.
  • 9
    Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:710.
  • 10
    Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, et al. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:512518.
  • 11
    Van Dijken JW. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentine lesions. Am J Dent 2004;17:2732.
  • 12
    Türkün LS. The clinical performance of one- and two-step self-etching adhesive systems at one year. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:656664.
  • 13
    Perdigao J. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:333357.
  • 14
    Grégoire G, Ahmed Y. Evaluation of the enamel etching capacity of six contemporary self-etching adhesives. J Dent 2007;35:388397.
  • 15
    Rotta M, Bresciani P, Moura SK, et al. Effects of phosphoric acid pretreatment and substitution of bonding resin on bonding effectiveness of self-etching systems to enamel. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:537545.
  • 16
    Heymann HO, Bayne SC. Current concepts in dentine bonding: focusing on dentinal adhesion factors. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:2636.
  • 17
    Ryge G, Cvar JF. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. US Dental Health Center. Publication No. 7902244. San Francisco: US Government Printing Office, 1971.
  • 18
    Lopes GC, Baratieri CM, Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr, Cardoso Vieira LC. Bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: effect of acid etching time. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:1923.
  • 19
    Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review. J Dent 2004;32:173196.
  • 20
    Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, et al. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 1996;75:14041413.
  • 21
    Kwong SM, Tay FR, Yip HK, Kei LH, Pashley DH. An ultrastructural study of the application of dentine adhesives to acid-conditioned sclerotic dentine. J Dent 2000;28:515528.
  • 22
    Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Montanari G, Pashley DH. Thickness and morphology of resin-infiltrated dentine layer in young, old, and sclerotic dentin. Oper Dent 1999;24:6672.
  • 23
    Brackett WW, Brackett MG, Dib A, Franco G, Estudillo H. Eighteen-month clinical performance of a self-etching primer in unprepared class V resin restorations. Oper Dent 2005;30:424429.
  • 24
    Franco EB, Benetti AR, Ishikiriama SK, et al. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2006;31:403408.
  • 25
    Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006;34:97105.
  • 26
    Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Sluder TB. Contributing co-variables in clinical trials. Am J Dent 1991;4:247250.
  • 27
    Ozer F, Sengun A, Ozturk B, Say EC, Tagami J. Effect of tooth age on microtensile bond strength of two fluoride releasing bonding agents. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:289295.
  • 28
    Karakaya S, Unlu N, Say EC, Ozer F, Soyman M, Tagami J. Bond strengths of three different dentine adhesive systems to sclerotic dentin. Dent Mater J 2008;27:471479.
  • 29
    De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118132.
  • 30
    Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:397412.
  • 31
    Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater 2005;21:375383.
  • 32
    Perdigão J, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, et al. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months. Am J Dent 2005;18:135140.
  • 33
    Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli PV, De Munck J, et al. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the three-year clinical effectiveness of two-etch and rinse adhesives in cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2004;29:376385.