Inhibition of early biofilm formation by glass-ionomer incorporated with chlorhexidine in vivo: a pilot study
Article first published online: 28 FEB 2012
© 2012 Australian Dental Association
Australian Dental Journal
Volume 57, Issue 1, pages 58–64, March 2012
How to Cite
Du, X., Huang, X., Huang, C., Frencken, J. and Yang, T. (2012), Inhibition of early biofilm formation by glass-ionomer incorporated with chlorhexidine in vivo: a pilot study. Australian Dental Journal, 57: 58–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01642.x
- Issue published online: 28 FEB 2012
- Article first published online: 28 FEB 2012
- (Accepted for publication 24 July 2011.)
- 1Glass ionomers: a review of their current status. Oper Dent 1999;24:115–124..
- 2The use of acoustic microscopy to study the mechanical properties of glass-ionomer cement. Dent Mater 2004;20:358–363., , , et al.
- 3Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:425–429..
- 4Therapeutic effect of glass-ionomers: an overview of evidence. Aust Dent J 2011;56:10–15., , .
- 5The short-term in situ model to evaluate the anticariogenic potential of ionomeric materials. J Dent 2005;33:491–497., , , et al.
- 6Antibacterial activity and physical properties of conventional glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine diacetate/cetrimide mixtures. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011;23:46–55., , , , , .
- 7Antibacterial effects and physical properties of glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine for the ART approach. Dent Mater 2006;22:647–652., , , , , .
- 8Chlorhexidine release from an experimental glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials 2004;25:5423–5431., , , .
- 9In vitro fluoride release and the antibacterial effect of glass ionomers containing chlorhexidine gluconate. Oper Dent 2008;33:696–701., .
- 10Antibacterial effect of chlorhexidine-containing glass ionomer cement in vivo: a pilot study. Caries Res 2007;41:102–107., , , et al.
- 11Resistance to degradation of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements dentine bonds. J Dent 2009;37:342–347., , , .
- 12Dental caries: a dynamic disease process. Aust Dent J 2008;53:286–291..
- 13Technical note: antimicrobial action of glass-ionomer lining cement on S. sanguis and S. mutans. Dent Mater 1989;5:281–282., , , .
- 14Interaction between GIC and S. sanguis biofilms: antibacterial properties and changes of surface hardness. J Dent 2006;34:588–597., , .
- 15Architecture of intact natural human plaque biofilms studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Dent Res 2000;79:21–27., , , , , .
- 16Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm development. J Dent Res 2009;88:982–990., , , .
- 17Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community – implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health 2006;6(Suppl 1):S14..
- 18Anti-plaque agents in the prevention of biofilm-associated oral diseases. Oral Dis 2003;9(Suppl 1): 23–29., .
- 19Effect of chlorhexidine/thymol and fluoride varnishes on dental biofilm formation in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 2007;115:468–472., , , .
- 20Effect of two antimicrobial agents on early in situ biofilm formation. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:147–152., , , , , .
- 21Conofocal microscopy study of undisturbed and chlorhexidine-treated dental biofilm. J Dent Res 2001;80:1436–1440., , .
- 22Chlorhexidine release from room temperature polymerising methacrylate systems. Biomaterials 2000;21:345–351., , .
- 23Analyses of biofilms accumulated on dental restorative materials. Am J Dent 2009;22:131–136., , , , , .
- 24The role of sucrose in cariogenic dental biofilm formation–new insight. J Dent Res 2006;85:878–887., , , , .
- 25Antibacterial and physical properties of resin modified glass-ionomers combined with chlorhexidine. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:553–558., , , .