SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    O’Hare WSJ. Medico Legal Radiology. Elsevier Australia, 2007:17.
  • 2
    Rogers v. Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479.
  • 3
    Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582.
  • 4
    Breen v. Williams (1996) 186 CLR 71.
  • 5
    Tabet v. Gett [2010] HCA 12.
  • 6
    Webb DV, Solomaon SB, Thomson JEM. Background radiation levels and medical exposure levels in Australia. Radiat Protection Aust 2000;16:2532.
  • 7
    O’Hare WSJ. Medico Legal Radiology. Elsevier Australia, 2007:16.
  • 8
    Moss M, MacLean D. Paediatric and adult computed tomography practice and patient dose in Australia. Australas Radiol 2006;50:3340.
  • 9
    Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:289296.
  • 10
    Cardinal JS, Gunderman RB, Tarver RD. Informing patients about risks and benefits of radiology examinations; a review article. J Am Coll Radiol 2011;8:402408.
  • 11
    Tai v. Hatzistavrou [1999] NSWCA 306.
  • 12
    Sydney South West Area Health Service v. Stamoulis [2009] NSWCA 153.
  • 13
    Friedland B. Medicolegal issues related to cone beam CT. Semin Orthod 2009;15:7784.
  • 14
    Chappel v Hart [1998] HCA 55.
  • 15
    O’Hare WSJ. Medico Legal Radiology. Elsevier Australia, 2007:185186.
  • 16
    Hayakawa Y, Shibuya H, Ota Y, Kuroyanagi K. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 1997;38:2125.
  • 17
    Wenzel A, Møystad A. Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2010;68:106114.