SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Jon Robson, Aesthetic Testimony and the Norms of Belief Formation, European Journal of Philosophy, 2015, 23, 1
  2. 2
    Javier González De Prado Salas, David Teira, CHOOSING EXPERT STATISTICAL ADVICE: PRACTICAL COSTS AND EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATION, Episteme, 2015, 12, 01, 117

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Susann Wagenknecht, Facing the Incompleteness of Epistemic Trust: Managing Dependence in Scientific Practice, Social Epistemology, 2015, 29, 2, 160

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Fons Wijnhoven, Michel Brinkhuis, Internet information triangulation: Design theory and prototype evaluation, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66, 4
  5. 5
    L. Morales, Taking Facts Seriously: Judicial Intervention in Public Health Controversies, Public Health Ethics, 2015,

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    N. Ballantyne, THE SIGNIFICANCE OF UNPOSSESSED EVIDENCE, The Philosophical Quarterly, 2015,

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    B. Miller, WHY (SOME) KNOWLEDGE IS THE PROPERTY OF A COMMUNITY AND POSSIBLY NONE OF ITS MEMBERS, The Philosophical Quarterly, 2015,

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Wolfgang Detel, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2015,

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Jon Robson, Aesthetic Autonomy and Self-Aggrandisement, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 2014, 75, 3

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Regina A. Rini, Analogies, Moral Intuitions, and the Expertise Defence, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2014, 5, 2, 169

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Kristen Intemann, Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Are there limits to scientists’ obligations to seek and engage dissenters?, Synthese, 2014,

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Klemens Kappel, Believing on trust, Synthese, 2014, 191, 9, 2009

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Andreas Klinke, Ortwin Renn, Expertise and experience: a deliberative system of a functional division of labor for post-normal risk governance, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2014, 27, 4, 442

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Carlo Martini, Experts in science: a view from the trenches, Synthese, 2014, 191, 1, 3

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Douglas Allchin, From Science Studies to Scientific Literacy: A View from the Classroom, Science & Education, 2014, 23, 9, 1911

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Kevin J. S. Zollman, Modeling the social consequences of testimonial norms, Philosophical Studies, 2014,

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Douglas Walton, On a razor's edge: evaluating arguments from expert opinion, Argument & Computation, 2014, 5, 2-3, 139

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Susann Wagenknecht, OPAQUE AND TRANSLUCENT EPISTEMIC DEPENDENCE IN COLLABORATIVE SCIENTIFIC PRACTICE, Episteme, 2014, 11, 04, 475

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Conor Mayo-Wilson, Reliability of testimonial norms in scientific communities, Synthese, 2014, 191, 1, 55

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Boaz Miller, Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts: Lessons from the Bendectin Litigation, Foundations of Science, 2014,

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Alex Sager, Alex Zakaras, The Hanford Advisory Board: participatory democracy, technology, and representation, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2014, 4, 2, 142

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Melissa Lane, WHEN THE EXPERTS ARE UNCERTAIN: SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND THE ETHICS OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGMENT, Episteme, 2014, 11, 01, 97

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Aaron Lercher, Correlation over time for citations to mathematics articles, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64, 3
  24. 24
    Axel Gelfert, Coverage-Reliability, Epistemic Dependence, and the Problem of Rumor-Based Belief, Philosophia, 2013, 41, 3, 763

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Hanne Andersen, Susann Wagenknecht, Epistemic dependence in interdisciplinary groups, Synthese, 2013, 190, 11, 1881

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    MICHAEL FUERSTEIN, Epistemic Trust and Liberal Justification, Journal of Political Philosophy, 2013, 21, 2
  27. 27
    Laura Valentini, Justice, Disagreement and Democracy, British Journal of Political Science, 2013, 43, 01, 177

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Giuseppe Primiero, Laszlo Kosolosky, The Semantics of Untrustworthiness, Topoi, 2013,

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Helen De Cruz, Johan De Smedt, The value of epistemic disagreement in scientific practice. The case of Homo floresiensis, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2013, 44, 2, 169

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Boaz Miller, When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement, Synthese, 2013, 190, 7, 1293

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Frederik Truyen, Filip Buekens, Social Software and the Evolution of User Expertise, 2013,

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Jon Robson, Aesthetic Testimony, Philosophy Compass, 2012, 7, 1
  33. 33
    Aaron Dewitt, GROUP AGENCY AND EPISTEMIC DEPENDENCY, Episteme, 2012, 9, 03, 235

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Tomoji Shogenji, Internalism and Externalism in Meliorative Epistemology, Erkenntnis, 2012, 76, 1, 59

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Gerhard Schurz, META-INDUCTION IN EPISTEMIC NETWORKS AND THE SOCIAL SPREAD OF KNOWLEDGE, Episteme, 2012, 9, 02, 151

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Fons Wijnhoven, The Hegelian inquiring system and a critical triangulation tool for the Internet information slave: A design science study, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63, 6
  37. 37
    Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij, What’s so Good about a Wise and Knowledgeable Public?, Acta Analytica, 2012, 27, 2, 199

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Jean Goodwin, Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts, Argumentation, 2011, 25, 3, 285

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Axel Gelfert, Expertise, Argumentation, and the End of Inquiry, Argumentation, 2011, 25, 3, 297

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    James Hikins, Richard Cherwitz, On the Ontological and Epistemological Dimensions of Expertise: Why “Reality” and “Truth” Matter and How We Might Find Them, Social Epistemology, 2011, 25, 3, 291

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Pawel Sobkowicz, Simulations of opinion changes in scientific communities, Scientometrics, 2011, 87, 2, 233

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Harry Collins, Martin Weinel, Transmuted Expertise: How Technical Non-Experts Can Assess Experts and Expertise, Argumentation, 2011, 25, 3, 401

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    Jens-Erik Mai, Classification in a social world: bias and trust, Journal of Documentation, 2010, 66, 5, 627

    CrossRef

  44. 44
    Jörg Hardy, Seeking the Truth and Taking Care for Common Goods–Plato on Expertise and Recognizing Experts, Episteme, 2010, 7, 01, 7

    CrossRef

  45. 45
    Rogier De Langhe, The division of labour in science: the tradeoff between specialisation and diversity, Journal of Economic Methodology, 2010, 17, 1, 37

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Judith Simon, The entanglement of trust and knowledge on the Web, Ethics and Information Technology, 2010, 12, 4, 343

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Sanford Goldberg, Experts, Semantic and Epistemic, Noûs, 2009, 43, 4
  48. 48
    Gábor Á. Zemplén, Putting Sociology First—Reconsidering the Role of the Social in ‘Nature of Science’ Education, Science & Education, 2009, 18, 5, 525

    CrossRef

  49. 49
    Ben Almassi, Trust in expert testimony: Eddington's 1919 eclipse expedition and the British response to general relativity, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 2009, 40, 1, 57

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    Roger G. Koppl, Robert Kurzban, Lawrence Kobilinsky, Epistemics for Forensics, Episteme, 2008, 5, 2, 141

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    Anna Paldam Folker, Peter Sandøe, Leaping “Out of the Doubt”—Nutrition Advice: Values at Stake in Communicating Scientific Uncertainty to the Public, Health Care Analysis, 2008, 16, 2, 176

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Don Fallis, Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59, 10
  53. 53
    Michael Baurmann, Rational Fundamentalism? An Explanatory Model of Fundamentalist Beliefs, Episteme, 2007, 4, 02, 150

    CrossRef

  54. 54
    Alison Wylie, Introduction: When Difference Makes a Difference, Episteme, 2006, 3, 1-2, 1

    CrossRef

  55. 55
    John Beatty, Masking Disagreement among Experts, Episteme, 2006, 3, 1-2, 52

    CrossRef

  56. 56
    Sanford C. Goldberg, The Social Diffusion of Warrant and Rationality, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 2006, 44, S1
  57. 57
    David Coady, When Experts Disagree, Episteme, 2006, 3, 1-2, 68

    CrossRef

  58. 58
    Todd Stewart, The Competing Practices Argument and Self-Defeat, Episteme, 2005, 2, 01, 13

    CrossRef

  59. 59
    André Kukla, Joel Walmsley, Mysticism and Social Epistemology, Episteme, 2004, 1, 02, 139

    CrossRef

  60. 60
    Elizabeth Fricker, Trusting others in the sciences: a priori or empirical warrant?, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2002, 33, 2, 373

    CrossRef

  61. 61
    Erin I. Kelly, Publicity, The International Encyclopedia of Ethics,