How the World Is Measured Up in Size Experience
Article first published online: 11 JAN 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00431.x
© 2010 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LLC
Additional Information
How to Cite
BENNETT, D. J. (2011), How the World Is Measured Up in Size Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 83: 345–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00431.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 28 SEP 2011
- Article first published online: 11 JAN 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
I develop a Russellian representationalist account of size experience that draws importantly from contemporary vision science research on size perception. The core view is that size is experienced in ‘body-scaled’ units. So, an object might, say, be experienced as two eye-level units high. The view is sharpened in response to Thompson’s (forthcoming) Doubled Earth example. This example is presented by Thompson as part of an argument for a Fregean view of size experience. But I argue that the Russellian view I develop handles the Doubled Earth example in a natural and illuminating way, thereby avoiding the need to posit irreducible experiential ‘modes of presentation’. I also address a kind of neo-Fregean ‘reference-fixing’ view of size experience, that shares features with the Russellian view developed. I give reasons for favoring the latter. Finally, I argue that Peacocke’s claim that spatial experience is ‘unit free’ is not persuasive.

1933-1592/asset/bannerforeground.gif?v=1&s=8b5bd4cfb54387f9d9758742c88cd829c8d5ae1e)
