SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baars, B. (1997) In the Theater of Consciousness: the Workspace of the Mind (New York / Oxford, OUP).
  • Block, N. (2007) “Consciousness, accessibility and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30, pp. 481499.
  • Boghossian, P. A. (2006) Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press).
  • Boyd, R. 1991. “Realism, antifoundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds. Philosophical Studies 61: 127148.
  • Chalmers, D. (1996) The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (New York / Oxford, OUP).
  • Chalmers, D. (1998) “On the Search for the Neural Correlate of Consciousness,” conference transcript, Toward a Science of Consciousness II (Tucson); available at http://consc.net.
  • Clark, R. E. and J. R. MannsL. R. Squire (2001) “Trace and delay eyeblink conditioning: Contrasting phenomena of declarative and nondeclarative memory,” Psychological Science 12, pp. 304308.
    Direct Link:
  • Debner, J. A. and L. L. Jacoby (1994) “Unconscious perception: attention, awareness, and control,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 20(2), pp. 30417.
  • Dehaene, S. and Changeux, J.-P. (2004) “Neural mechanisms for access to consciousness,” in M. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences III, (Cambridge MA: MIT Press), pp. 11451158.
  • Dehaene, S. and Nacchache, L. (2001) “Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework,” Cognition 79, pp. 137.
  • Griffiths, P. E. (1997) What Emotions Really Are (Chicago, Chicago University Press).
  • Hacking, I. (1991) “A tradition of natural kinds,” Philosophical Studies 61, pp. 109126.
  • Hampton, R. R. (2001) “Rhesus monkeys know when they remember,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98(9), pp. 535962.
  • Hu, Y. and M. A. Goodale (2000) “Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12(5), pp. 856868.
  • Jack, A. I. and T. Shallice (2001) “Introspective physicalism as an approach to the science of consciousness,” Cognition 79(1-2), pp. 16196.
  • Landman, R., Spekreijse, H. and Lamme, V. A. F. (2003) “Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness,” Vision Research 43, pp. 149164.
  • Loar, B. (1990) “Phenomenal States,” in J. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives IV: Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind (pp. 81108). Atascadero: Ridgeview.
  • Merikle, P. M., Smilek, D. and Eastwood, J. D. (2001) “Perception without awareness: perspectives from cognitive psychology,” Cognition 79(1-2), pp. 11534.
  • Millikan, R. G. (2000) On Clear and Confused Ideas (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
  • Papineau, D. 2002. Thinking About Consciousness. Oxford: O.U.P.
  • Pearl, J. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge: CUP.
  • Putnam, Hilary (1975) “The meaning of ‘meaning’,” in Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2. Cambridge, CUP, pp. 251271.
  • Shea, N. 2007. “Content and its vehicles in connectionist systems,” Mind & Language 22: 24669.
  • Shea, N. and Bayne, T. 2010. “The vegetative state and the science of consciousness,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61: 45984.
  • Shea, N. and Heyes, C. 2010. “Metamemory as evidence of animal consciousness: the type that does the trick,” Biology and Philosophy 25: 95110.
  • Sperling, G. (1960) “The information available in brief visual presentations,” Psychological Monographs, 74(498 (whole issue)).
  • Wright, C. (1988) “Moral values, projection and secondary qualities,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 126.