No Luck With Knowledge? On a Dogma of Epistemology
Article first published online: 24 AUG 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00622.x
© 2012 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LLC
Issue

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Early View (Online Version of Record published before inclusion in an issue)
Additional Information
How to Cite
BAUMANN, P. (2012), No Luck With Knowledge? On a Dogma of Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00622.x
Publication History
- Article first published online: 24 AUG 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Current epistemological orthodoxy has it that knowledge is incompatible with luck. More precisely: Knowledge is incompatible with epistemic luck (of a certain, interesting kind). This is often treated as a truism which is not even in need of argumentative support. In this paper, I argue that there is lucky knowledge. In the first part, I use an intuitive and not very developed notion of luck to show that there are cases of knowledge which are “lucky” in that sense. In the second part, I look at philosophical conceptions of luck (modal and probabilistic ones) and come to the conclusion that knowledge can be lucky in those senses, too. I also turns out that a probabilistic notion of luck can help us see in what ways a particular piece of knowledge or belief can be lucky or not lucky.

1933-1592/asset/bannerforeground.gif?v=1&s=8b5bd4cfb54387f9d9758742c88cd829c8d5ae1e)