Magali Delmas is an Assistant Professor of Business Strategy at the Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management at the University of California Santa Barbara. Previous to embarking on an academic career, she worked at the European Commission at the Directorate for Industry. Her research is on the interaction between regulation and firms' competitive strategies. She is currently analyzing how alternative forms of environmental regulations, such as voluntary agreements and self-regulation, can impact firms' competitive advantage.
STAKEHOLDERS AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE CASE OF ISO 14001
Article first published online: 5 JAN 2009
© 2001 Production and Operations Management Society
Production and Operations Management
Volume 10, Issue 3, pages 343–358, September 2001
How to Cite
DELMAS, M. (2001), STAKEHOLDERS AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: THE CASE OF ISO 14001. Production and Operations Management, 10: 343–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00379.x
- Issue published online: 5 JAN 2009
- Article first published online: 5 JAN 2009
- Received March 2000; revision received July 2000; accepted November 2000.
- COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE;
- NATURAL ENVIRONMENT;
- RESOURCE-BASED VIEW;
- ORGANIZATIONAL CAPABILITY;
- STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING
This paper integrates a stakeholder perspective into the resource-based view of the firm, to analyze the mechanisms that link the adoption of the international Environmental Management Standard ISO 14001 to firms' competitive advantage. This paper shows that the perceived competitiveness impact of the standard depends mostly on the involvement of firms' external stakeholders (distributors, customers, community members, and regulatory agencies) in its design. ISO 14001 is a process standard, and it is difficult for stakeholders to get credible information on the effectiveness of the standard if they are not involved in its design. Stakeholders' involvement in a firm's ISO 14001 standard becomes a valuable organizational capability, which is difficult to imitate by competitors. The analysis is supported by primary data collected from a questionnaire mailed to 152 firms, resulting in 55 observations representing 30% of the total number of firms certified in the U.S. in August 1998.