SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Bacterial;
  • Bacterial species;
  • Bacterial virulence mechanisms;
  • Cellular immunity;
  • Immunology;
  • Microbiology;
  • Parenchymal disease;
  • Pneumonia;
  • Respiratory tract

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Clinical Manifestations
  4. Pathogenesis and Virulence
  5. Summary
  6. References

Pneumonia is a major cause of disease and death in foals. Rhodococcus equi, a Gram-positive facultative intracellular pathogen, is a common cause of pneumonia in foals. This article reviews the clinical manifestations of infection caused by R. equi in foals and summarizes current knowledge regarding mechanisms of virulence of, and immunity to, R. equi. A complementary consensus statement providing recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, control, and prevention of infections caused by R. equi in foals can be found in the same issue of the Journal.


Abbreviations
CDSs

coding sequences

CTL

cytotoxic T lymphocytes

EPDs

extrapulmonary disorders

LAM

lipoarabinomannan

ORFs

open reading frames

PAI

pathogenicity island

Vap

virulence-associated protein

Clinical Manifestations

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Clinical Manifestations
  4. Pathogenesis and Virulence
  5. Summary
  6. References

Pyogranulomatous Pneumonia

The most common clinical manifestation of disease caused by Rhodococcus equi infection is pyogranulomatous bronchopneumonia with abscessation (Fig 1).[1] Because ultrasonographic screening for early detection has become a routine practice at many farms endemic for pneumonia caused by R. equi (see consensus statement), the most frequently recognized form of R. equi infection on those farms is a subclinical form in which foals develop sonographic evidence of peripheral pulmonary consolidation or abscessation without manifesting clinical signs.[2, 3] On those farms, the cumulative frequency of sonographically visible areas of focal pulmonary consolidation or abscessation considerably exceeds the historical frequency of clinical pneumonia attributed to R. equi[2] suggesting that many subclinically affected foals might spontaneously recover without treatment. The proportion of such subclinically affected foals that progress to clinically apparent disease is currently unknown, and might vary by farm, geographical region, and age at which foals are examined.[3] When respiratory disease does become clinically apparent, disease is frequently initially insidious, becoming chronic and progressive. A small proportion of affected foals develop a severe, subacute form of pneumonia; these foals might be found dead or develop severe, acute respiratory distress.

image

Figure 1. Cross-section of a lung from a foal with pyogranulomatous pneumonia caused by Rhodococcus equi. Courtesy of Dr William Castelman.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Usually, foals first manifest clinical signs of R. equi pneumonia between 3 and 24 weeks of life, with most foals showing signs before 16 weeks of age. Infections are uncommon among horses older than 6 months of age. Clinical signs of pneumonia are variable and are dependent upon the stage and severity of pulmonary lesions. Initial clinical signs might include fever, lethargy, and cough.[4] As pneumonia progresses, clinical signs might include anorexia, tachycardia, tachypnea, flared nostrils, and increased effort and abdominal excursion during respiration.[4] Tachypnea and coughing are sometimes exacerbated by exertion during exercise or handling. Bilateral nasal discharge is an inconsistent finding.[5] Early in the course of disease, body condition is generally normal; however, in foals with chronic disease, weight loss or failure to grow might be apparent. In a recent report of 161 foals affected with R. equi pneumonia, the most common clinical signs were cough (71%), fever (68%), lethargy (53%), and increased respiratory effort (43%).[5]

Extrapulmonary Disorders (EPDs)

There are numerous EPDs that are associated with R. equi infections, including extrapulmonary sites of infection and immune-mediated disorders.[6] In a study of 150 foals with R. equi infections admitted to a teaching hospital, at least 1 of 39 different EPDs were recognized in 74% of foals, although some EPDs were recognized only during necropsy examination.[6] Survival was lower among foals with EPDs (43%; 48/111) than among foals without EPDs (82%; 32/39).[6] EPDs might occur concurrent with or independent of pneumonia, and some foals have multiple EPDs concurrently.[1, 6] Some EPDs are subclinical and can be difficult to recognize antemortem.[6] Some EPDs (eg, polysynovitis) might be the 1st clinical manifestation of R. equi-associated disease, detected before signs of pneumonia. Some EPDs (eg, abdominal abscesses) might negatively affect prognosis, even in foals whose pneumonia responds to treatment.[6]

Diarrhea might occur in foals infected with R. equi either as an EPD caused by pyogranulomatous typhlocolitis or as a result of antimicrobial treatment.[1, 6-8] Abdominal lesions are identified in approximately 50% of foals with R. equi pneumonia that are presented for necropsy,[1] and include any of the following, alone or in combination(s): pyogranulomatous enterotyphylocolitis (Fig 2); pyogranulomatous lymphadenitis of the mesenteric or colonic lymph nodes; large intra-abdominal abscesses; and peritonitis.[1, 6] Intestinal lesions can be difficult to detect antemortem, but lymphadenitis and abdominal abscesses can be detected sonographically in some foals.[6] Interestingly, of 31 foals with ulcerative enterotyphlocolitis identified at necropsy, only 12 foals had diarrhea whereas 9 foals had diminished growth.[6] Abdominal abscesses are uncommon, but typically are large and contain mucopurulent material, sometimes with caseous centers, that presumably originate from abdominal lymph nodes infected with R. equi.[6, 9] Abscesses are frequently adhered to other abdominal organs, including the intestinal tract, liver, spleen, or body wall.[6] Of 25 foals with abdominal abscesses, clinical signs included diarrhea (9 foals), diminished growth (8 foals), and colic (1 foal).[6] Some foals with abdominal lymphadenitis will have lymphatic obstruction resulting in lymphangiectasia.[10] Foals with abdominal abscesses have a poor prognosis.[6]

image

Figure 2. Mucosal surface of colon of foal with pyogranulomatous colitis caused by Rhodococcus equi.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Polysynovitis occurs in approximately one fourth to one third of foals with R. equi infections.[6, 11] Clinical signs include effusion of one or more synovial structures, generally without apparent lameness. Multiple joints are often affected, most commonly the stifles, tarsocrural, carpal, and fetlock joints. Immunoglobulin was detected within the synovial membrane of 3 affected foals and antibodies directed against autologous or heterologous Fc portion of immunoglobulin were identified in the synovial fluid of 1 foal.[12, 13] These findings suggest an immune-mediated process. However, heavy intrabronchial challenge with virulent R. equi also results in polysynovitis without lameness.[14] Culture of the synovial fluid of affected foals within a few days of the onset of synovial effusion yields growth of R. equi and histological examination of the synovial membrane reveals suppurative inflammation.[14] Therefore, an alternative and more likely explanation is that septic polysynovitis results from bacteremia, but that the infection is rapidly cleared from the synovial structures resulting in chronic nonseptic inflammation at the time of diagnosis.

Some foals with R. equi infections develop ocular lesions including uveitis, keratouveitis, and panophthalmitis.[6] Affected foals might display epiphora, photophobia, aqueous flare, hypopyon, iris discoloration, miosis, and other ophthalmic abnormalities. The pathogenesis of uveitis is often unknown, but might include dissemination of bacteria to the eye or immune-mediated mechanisms. In 1 study, foals with uveitis were less likely to survive than foals without uveitis.[6]

Rhodococcus equi can cause osteomyelitis, septic synovitis, or both.[6] Septic synovitis is differentiated from polysynovitis (described above) by the severity of lameness and by cytological evidence of septic synovial fluid. Septic synovitis can involve only 1 joint, whereas polysynovitis by definition involves more than 1 site. Vertebral osteomyelitis caused by R. equi has been described in foals.[6] Clinical signs might include stiff gait, reluctance to move, palpable pain, and sometimes soft-tissue swelling associated with paravertebral abscessation.[6] If the infection or associated swelling spreads to the epidural space, neurological signs of spinal cord disease or nerve root compression might be apparent.[6] Specific neurological signs are dependent upon the specific region of the spinal cord that is affected. Foals with vertebral osteomyelitis generally have a poor prognosis, although a foal with diskospondylitis involving 3 sacral vertebrae responded to surgical debridement of infected bone and long-term antimicrobial treatment.[15]

Pyogranulomatous mediastinal lymphadenopathy can result in compression of the trachea, and occasionally an outward swelling of the pectoral region[6]; tracheal compression might cause respiratory distress or a respiratory noise. Few foals with R. equi pneumonia develop pleural effusion.[6, 9] Pyogranulomatous R. equi lesions also can develop in the liver, kidney, spleen, or nervous tissue.[6] Disease caused by such lesions is often subclinical and only recognized during postmortem examination. A foal with a brain abscess (recognized via computed tomography) associated with R. equi infection has been described.[16]

Intermittent or persistent bacteremia with R. equi might be more common than recognized, and might result in metastatic spread of infection. The proportion of foals that are blood culture-positive and the stages of disease during which bacteremia is most likely to occur are ill-defined. Rhodococcus equi was isolated from the blood of 11 of 19 foals;[6] foals with positive blood culture results were less likely to survive than foals that were culture-negative.[6]

Other less common EPDs associated with metastatic spread of R. equi include pericarditis, endocarditis, cellulitis, dermatitis, subcutaneous abscesses, peripheral lymphadenopathy, guttural pouch empyema, pleuritis, sinusitis, myositis, stomatitis, pyometra and omphalitis.[6] Other immune-mediated EPDs include immune-mediated hemolytic anemia, immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, and telogen effluvium.[6]

Pathogenesis and Virulence

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Clinical Manifestations
  4. Pathogenesis and Virulence
  5. Summary
  6. References

Pathogenesis

Inhalation of virulent R. equi is the major route of pulmonary infection. The incubation period after experimental intrabronchial challenge varies from approximately 9 days after administration of a heavy inoculum to approximately 2–4 weeks when a lower inoculum is administered.[14, 17] Lung consolidation can be detected as early as 3 days after heavy intrabronchial challenge.[14] The incubation period under field conditions is unknown and likely depends on several factors including the number of virulent bacteria in air samples in the environment, age of the foal, and host defense mechanisms. Ingestion of the organism is an important route of exposure, and likely also of immunization, but rarely leads to hematogenously acquired pneumonia unless a foal has multiple exposures to large numbers of bacteria.[18]

Epidemiological evidence suggests that most foals on endemic farms become infected early in life.[19] The median age at the time of diagnosis is approximately 35–50 days on most endemic farms.[5, 20] Given the fairly long incubation period of the disease, this finding would also support the fact that many foals become infected early in life. In 1 study, foals aged between 3 and 13 days (mean 6.4 days) were more susceptible to experimentally induced R. equi pneumonia than foals aged between 14 and 36 days (mean 25 days).[87] Collectively, these findings indicate that many foals on endemic farms become infected at a young age and that younger foals are more susceptible to infection caused by R. equi. However, these findings do not necessarily indicate that foals are only susceptible to R. equi during the neonatal period. Older foals are also susceptible to experimental infection with R. equi. In 1 study, intratracheal administration of R. equi to 10 foals between 27 and 67 days (mean 49 days) of age resulted in disease in all foals including those receiving a low dose challenge.[21]

Virulence

Twenty years ago, independent laboratories reported the seminal finding that strains of R. equi isolated from foals with pneumonia contained a plasmid of 80- to 90-kb in size.[22, 23] Subsequently, the association between plasmid possession and virulence was established by demonstrating that plasmid curing or loss yielded a bacterial strain unable to cause disease in mice and foals.[14, 21, 24] Furthermore, the plasmid was shown to enable intracellular replication in macrophages.[14, 25]

Sequencing and annotation of the virulence plasmid revealed 73 coding sequences (CDSs),[26, 27] and that it was divisible into 4 discrete areas based upon open reading frame (ORF) amino acid sequence similarity and predicted protein function. The “backbone” sequence of the plasmid is highly similar to that of a plasmid found in the environmental organism Rhodococcus erythropolis and consists of regions for replication/partitioning, conjugation, and unknown functions.[26] The 4th plasmid region is an approximately 21-kb pathogenicity island (PAI) that is crucial for virulence of this bacterium for foals.[26, 27] The PAI likely was acquired through horizontal gene transfer from a bacterial source of unknown origin, an insertion event which probably took place in the soil and dramatically increased the in vivo survival capabilities of the host bacterium.

The 26 CDSs of the PAI include the unique and R. equi-specific family of proteins, the virulence-associated protein family (Vap family).[27] There are 6 full-length vap genes, (vapA, -C, -D, -E, -G, -H) and 3-truncated vap pseudogenes (vapF, -I, and -X).[26] To date, vapA, which encodes an immunodominant, temperature-inducible, and surface-expressed lipoprotein,[28, 29] is the only vap gene with a demonstrated role in virulence,[30] whereas Vaps C, D, E, F, G, I, and X appear to be dispensable.[30, 31] VapA is required for establishment of a persistent infection in severely immunodeficient mice and for intracellular growth in macrophages,[30] where it aids in preventing maturation of the phagosome to the stage of fusion of R. equi-containing vacuoles with lysosomes.[32] The functions of the other Vap proteins are unknown. Interestingly, R. equi strains isolated from pigs with lymphadenitis also contain a plasmid with a similar backbone, but distinct PAI-encoded vap genes, suggesting that the specific Vaps present somehow dictate host species tropism.[26]

Although vapA is necessary for virulence, it is not sufficient.[14] Additional virulence determinants reside within the PAI.[31] Two of these, virR and orf8, each encode a regulatory protein.[33, 34] Loss of either regulator results in decreased vapA transcription and also in attenuation of the organism.[33, 34]

A 2nd major advance in the understanding of R. equi virulence was the recent sequencing and annotation of the genome of R. equi strain 103.[35] The 5.04-Mb R. equi genome is most similar to that of the environmental bacterium Rhodococcus jostii (RHA1) and then to Nocardia farcinica and Mycobacterium tuberculosis.[35] As with these other Actinomycetes, a large number of the 4,598 genes of R. equi appear to be involved in lipid metabolism (both anabolism and catabolism). Like M. tuberculosis, lipids are a key component of the outer cell envelope of R. equi.[36] This mycolic acid-containing glycolipid barrier might serve to protect the peptidoglycan and plasma membrane from the damaging effects of host-generated enzymes and immune-mediated reactive intermediates. Mycolic acid carbon chain length varies among R. equi isolates and, notably, it was observed that strains with longer mycolic acids were more lethal to mice.[37] Furthermore, it has been established that host lipids are a preferred in vivo carbon source for M. tuberculosis[38] and such also is likely to be true for R. equi. The finding that a mutant of R. equi possessing a defective glyoxylate shunt enzyme activity, isocitrate lyase, necessary for growth on fatty acids, was unable to multiply in macrophages and was attenuated in mice and foals, is consistent with this contention.[39]

Analysis of the genome sequence reveals that R. equi has 23 complete 2-component regulatory systems (TCS) apart from the PAI-encoded orphan response regulator (orf8). TCS represent the most common type of regulation system found in bacteria. The more complicated an organism's lifestyle, the greater is the number of TCS needed to allow for genetic adaptation to specific environmental changes. Recently, it has been determined that the TCS sensor kinase MtrB of R. equi is needed for adaptation to and growth within the intramacrophage environment.[40] It is likely that other TCS also participate in the expression of virulence traits.

Some of the most exciting recent data in the R. equi field is the recognition of molecular “crosstalk” between the virulence plasmid and the R. equi chromosome. Microarray analysis of chromosomal gene expression patterns of the virulence plasmid-containing strain 103 and a plasmid-free derivative were compared under vap gene-inducing (37°C; pH 6.5) and noninducing conditions (30°C; pH 8.0) showed that the virulence plasmid enhanced the expression of a number of chromosomal genes when the bacteria were cultured under vap gene-inducting conditions.[35] This suggests that a gene or genes on the plasmid directly or indirectly regulate chromosomal gene expression patterns, and that the 2 regulators in the PAI region could be involved. Two chromosomal genes, REQ23860 and REQ23850, encoding a chorismate mutase and a bifunctional anthranilate synthase, respectively (enzymatic components of the aromatic amino acid biosynthesis pathway), were most strongly co-induced with the vap genes.[35] Independent mutation of each of these genes decreased the capacity of the bacterium to replicate in macrophages. Interestingly, the R. equi genome contains 4 chorismate mutase genes, 1 of which is located in the virulence plasmid PAI region. In general, aromatic amino acids are likely limiting in the macrophage intracellular vacuolar environment, and thus an enhanced ability to synthesize aromatic amino acids via increased utilization of the chorismate precursor could translate to improved intracellular survival.

Although R. equi is considered an obligate aerobe, mutation of narG, encoding nitrate reductase, was found to be severely attenuating to the pathogenicity of the bacterium in infected mice. [41] The latter finding might indicate an inability of the mutant to assimilate nitrate in vivo in the absence of NarG, or might suggest that R. equi uses nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor in the hypoxic and possibly anaerobic granulomatous environment it faces in vivo.

Immunity

Rhodococcus equi-Phagocytic Cell Interactions

Once inhaled, R. equi is taken up by alveolar macrophages through a process of receptor-mediated phagocytosis. One of the receptors used by macrophages to engulf complement opsonized R. equi is complement receptor 3 (CR3 or Mac-1).[42] In addition, R. equi might utilize the macrophage mannose receptor for entry which might recognize lipoarabinomannan (LAM), an outer surface component of the bacterium, either directly or via mannose binding protein or surfactant molecules adhered to LAM.[43] Once engulfed by resident macrophages, virulent R. equi are able to modify the phagocytic vacuole to prevent acidification and subsequent fusion with lysosomes.[32, 44-46] Bacterial gene expression patterns are altered to accommodate survival in the intracellular environment and allow acquisition of essential nutrients such as iron, as well as to promote resistance to host-derived reactive oxygen intermediates.[47, 48] Uncontrolled intracellular replication of R. equi leads to necrosis of the macrophage.[49] If opsonized with R. equi-specific antibody, presumably promoting bacterial entry via the macrophage Fc receptor, the fate of the R. equi-containing phagosome is altered and lysosome fusion occurs.[50] This might explain how the presence of R. equi antibody might aid in the prevention of infection. Killing of R. equi by mouse macrophages is dependent upon the presence of interferon (IFN)-γ, which activates macrophages to produce both reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen intermediates. These 2 radicals combine to form peroxynitrite, which efficiently kills R. equi.[51] Neither reactive oxygen nor reactive nitrogen intermediates alone are sufficient to mediate killing of R. equi.[51] Additional cytokines such as TNF-α might have similar effects on macrophages, because both IFN-γ and TNF-α are both required for clearance of virulent R. equi in mice.[52] Neutrophils play an important role in early host defense against virulent R. equi.[53] As opposed to macrophages, neutrophils from foals and adult horses are fully able to kill R equi.[54-56] As seen with macrophages, killing of R. equi by neutrophils is considerably enhanced by specific opsonizing antibody.[57, 58]

Adaptive Immunity

Immunity to R. equi pneumonia in foals probably depends on both the antibody and cell-mediated components of the immune system, but its exact basis remains to be determined. The strongest evidence for a role of antibody in protection against R. equi is the partially protective effect of passively transferred anti-R. equi hyperimmune equine plasma (summarized in the consensus statement in this issue). Because of the facultative intracellular nature of R. equi, cell-mediated immune mechanisms are thought to be of major importance in resistance to infection (Fig 3). A large part of the knowledge of cell-mediated immunity to R. equi infections comes from infection of mice. Deficiencies in the complement component C5 and NK cells in mice do not impair the pulmonary clearance of virulent R. equi.[59] In contrast, functional T lymphocytes are absolutely required for the clearance of virulent R. equi in mice.[60-62] However, mice lacking functional T lymphocytes clear plasmid-cured derivatives from their lungs within 1 week of infection, suggesting that clearance of avirulent plasmid-negative strains in mice does not require functional lymphocytes and depends mainly on innate defense mechanisms.[61]

image

Figure 3. Paradigm for adaptive immunity: The current working hypothesis is that an effective vaccine to prevent rhodococcal pneumonia will need to drive a foal's immune response to Rhodococcus equi toward a protective Type 1 response. Type 1 responses are characterized by the production of antigen-specific Th1 lymphocytes, which allow for clearance of intracellular R. equi via the production of interferon (IFN)-γ and the activation of macrophages, and by antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes, which recognize and kill R. equi-infected cells. In contrast, foals that respond to infection with a Th2 response are predicted to develop potentially life-threatening pulmonary lesions. As shown via dashed lines, innate immune responses, including the responses of dendritic cells, strongly influence the ensuing adaptive response. The role of suppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs) remains unknown. However, these cells are prevalent and functional in neonates of other species. Likewise, there has been little work to investigate the role of the Th17 subset of T lymphocytes. Th17 cells develop under the influence of interleukin (IL)-23 and TGF-β and are defined by the signature cytokine IL-17. Th17 cells and IL-17 are known to play roles in autoimmune diseases and immune clearance of other intracellular pathogens, and so are likely to be involved in immunity to R. equi as well.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The 2 major mechanisms by which T lymphocytes mediate clearance of intracellular pathogens are secretion of cytokines and direct cytotoxicity. Although both CD4+ (helper) and CD8+ (cytotoxic) T cells contribute to host defense against R. equi in mice, CD4+ T lymphocytes probably play the major role and are absolutely required for complete pulmonary clearance.[62-64] Studies in mice have clearly shown that a Type 1 response, characterized by IFN-γ production by T helper lymphocytes, is sufficient to effect pulmonary clearance of R. equi whereas a Type 2 response, characterized by IL-4 production, is detrimental.[60, 65]

As opposed to foals, adult horses are typically resistant to R. equi infections. Immune adult horses have been used as a relevant model to better understand what responses are necessary for immunologic protection. Clearance of virulent R. equi in immune adult horses is associated with lymphoproliferative responses to R. equi antigens, development of R. equi-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), and IFN-γ induction.[66-68] Interestingly, R. equi-specific CTL, which are apparently present in all immune adults, are major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-unrestricted and appear to recognize unique bacterial lipids from the cell wall.[69, 70] The current thought is that these lipid antigens might be presented to T lymphocytes via the CD1 system, as has been well described in M. tuberculosis.[71] How these findings in mice and adult horses relate to the foal is an area of active research.

Immunity to R. equi in Foals

Virtually all newborn mammals are immunologically immature and have an assortment of immunologic deficits compared to older animals. In general, neonates and perinates have diminished innate immune responses, decreased antigen-presenting cell function, and are less able to mount type-1 immune responses.[72] As a result, neonates of various species demonstrate an increased susceptibility to certain infections.

A number of relative immunologic deficits have been demonstrated in foals. In conjunction with the lack of immunologic memory in newborns, these are postulated to account for the unique age-associated susceptibility of foals to rhodococcal pneumonia. Age-related deficiencies in R. equi-specific CTL activity has been documented in 3-week-old foals.[70] Activity of CTLs is improved by 6 weeks of age and is similar to that of adult horses by 8 weeks.[70] Antigen-presenting cells from foals have significantly lower CD1 and MHC class II expression compared to that from adult horses.[71, 73] In addition, several studies have demonstrated that the ability of equine lymphocytes and neutrophils to produce or upregulate various cytokines, or both, is strongly influenced by age.[72-77] In particular, the finding that young foals are deficient in their ability to produce IFN-γ in response to mitogens has led to the hypothesis that an IFN-γ deficiency and Th2 bias might be at the basis of their peculiar susceptibility to R. equi infections.[74, 75] However, recent data demonstrate that foals are also deficient in their ability to produce IL-4 in response to stimulations with mitogens and after vaccination with a killed adjuvanted vaccine, suggesting that a clear polarization toward a Th2 response is unlikely in neonatal foals.[78-80] Consistent with these findings, experimental infection of young foals with virulent R. equi results in IFN-γ induction and antibody responses similar to or greater than that of adult horses undergoing the same experimental challenge.[81]

Recent studies have investigated various immunostimulants that might enhance host defense mechanisms during the relatively narrow period of susceptibility to R. equi. Inactivated Parapoxvirus ovis, Propionibacterium acnes, and unmethylated CpGs enhance ex vivo or in vitro phagocytic cell function or cytokine induction in foals.[82-84] However, despite successfully enhancing IFN-γ production in foals, inactivated P. ovis failed to decrease the cumulative incidence of pneumonia at an R. equi-endemic farm. In the same study, IFN-γ and IL-4 secretion at birth was not associated with subsequent development of pneumonia.[85]

Spontaneous resolution of R. equi pneumonia after experimental challenge has been recognized.[86-88] Many foals on farms where the disease is endemic do not develop disease or develop subclinical disease that resolves without intervention. In addition, intragastric administration of live, virulent R. equi to newborn foals confers complete protection against subsequent heavy intrabronchial challenge.[89, 90] Oral inoculation with virulent R. equi results in accelerated development of R. equi-specific CTL,[91] providing a potential mechanism for the protection conferred by oral inoculation. Collectively, these findings unequivocally demonstrate that most foals have the ability to mount protective immune responses to R. equi. The basis for the peculiar susceptibility of foals to infection with R. equi is likely complex and multifactorial rather than involving a simple and single explanation. Similarly, it is unknown why some foals develop EPDs and others do not.

Attempts at Active Immunization

It would be convenient to control R. equi pneumonia on endemic farms by active immunization of mares or foals with a protective antigen. To date, however, this approach has been largely unrewarding. The role of antibody in partial protection against R. equi infection would suggest that vaccination of mares could confer at least some degree of protection. However, in both a field study and an experimental challenge, vaccination of mares did not provide protection against R. equi pneumonia despite a significant increase in colostral R. equi-specific antibody and transfer of these antibodies to foals.[92, 93] More recently, vaccination of a small number of mares with VapA associated with a water-based nanoparticle adjuvant led to high anti-VapA IgG concentrations in mares and foals and might have conferred protection against natural challenge compared to nonvaccinated controls.[94] Large-scale studies at endemic farms will be necessary to confirm these preliminary findings before widespread vaccination of mares can be recommended.

Because cell-mediated immunity is of paramount importance for protection against R. equi, active immunization of foals probably will be required for complete protection. Oral immunization with Salmonella enterica Typhimurium expressing the VapA antigen protects mice against R. equi infection.[95] Recent studies in mice indicate that DNA immunization with vapA protects against R. equi infection and that the IgG subisotype response is consistent with a Th1-based immune response.[96] A similar DNA vaccine containing the vapA gene has been shown to induce strong cell-mediated immune responses in adult horses, but responses were poor in foals.[97] Intrabronchial immunization of neonatal foals with a live, fully attenuated, riboflavin auxotrophic strain of R. equi stimulated immune responses but did not confer protection against subsequent intrabronchial challenge with live R. equi.[98] The fact that live, avirulent plasmid-cured R. equi does not elicit adaptive immunity and is cleared rapidly indicates that replication is needed for induction of strong cell-mediated immune responses.[66] Intrabronchial immunization with a deletion mutant of R. equi lacking the chromosomal genes isocitrate lyase (icl) and cholesterol oxidase (choE) conferred protection against subsequent challenge in 3 foals.[99] However, 2 foals developed pneumonia caused by the mutant strain.[99] Collectively, the aforementioned studies indicate that there is a fine line between sufficient replication of R. equi for induction of strong cell-mediated immune responses and disease from the vaccine strain. Additional challenges are that immunization in foals will need to be initiated very early in life and an effective vaccine will have to overcome the relative immaturity of the naive neonatal immune system.

There are several critical areas in need of further study to develop a vaccine against R. equi, including (1) determining immunologic correlates of protection; (2) defining limitations of foal immunity; and (3) specifying antigens that confer protective immunity. These 3 issues are considered below.

Although much has been learned from mice and immune adult horses, the immunologic correlates of protection against R. equi in foals (ie, “the responses an effective vaccine must induce in foals”) are only vaguely defined. Moreover, foals are clearly different from both mice and adult horses in their inherent susceptibility, immunologic capabilities (discussed above), and lack of immunologic memory. An important need that remains is a broad and cost-effective repertoire of standardized immunologic tests to measure the responses of horses to infection and immunization. With these tools, veterinary scientists could better define what constitutes a protective response and measure the ability of new vaccines to induce those responses in foals. Immunogens could then be designed or modified to induce better protection.

Researchers have begun to define the immunologic capabilities of neonatal and perinatal foals. The primary focus has been on immunologic deficits that might contribute to susceptibility to R. equi infection or that are likely obstacles to vaccination of horses early in life. A problem with these studies is that most examine transcription of cytokine mRNA, rather than protein expression. Moreover, differences among studies relative to the nature of the immune stimuli, time-points examined, and methods make comparison difficult. As a result, the relevance of these data to what occurs in vivo is not always clear. As noted above, improved tools to measure relevant immune responses in standardized ways would be a significant step forward. Perhaps more importantly, there needs to be more research focused on methods to induce strong innate and Type 1 immune responses in neonatal foals. In other words, we must devise means to overcome the inherent age-associated immune limitations of early life. This might involve investigation of new immunostimulants, improved adjuvants, and novel approaches such as targeting the common mucosal immune system via the gut.

We still have little knowledge of which bacterial antigens are targets of protective immune responses. Although much work has focused on proteins encoded by the virulence plasmid, it remains to be determined whether or not a subunit approach can be successful. Given the complicated life-style of this bacterium and the complexity of the organism, a modified live vaccine might prove to be more appropriate. For example, evidence exists that immune adult horses recognize secreted antigens of R. equi.[100] Moreover, all immune adult horses have CTL that appear to recognize unique lipid antigens in the bacterial cell wall.[68, 69] A live attenuated vaccine could provide for at least limited intracellular replication, expression of selected vap genes, translation of secreted proteins, and immune presentation of bacterial lipids. Newer methods for genetic manipulation of R. equi are providing a means to strategically produce mutants that can be tested for their ability to induce protective responses in foals.[98, 101] The goal will be to generate strains that are attenuated enough to be safe and yet immunogenic enough to protect against challenge. In summary, active immunization to prevent rhodococcal pneumonia remains a very real possibility, but additional research is needed.

Summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Clinical Manifestations
  4. Pathogenesis and Virulence
  5. Summary
  6. References

Rhodococcal infection in foals is a complicated problem. An ill-defined proportion of foals with pulmonary infection will remain free of clinical signs and eventually clear the infection, whereas other foals might have either an insidiously progressive pneumonia or an acute onset of severe respiratory distress that is generally fatal. A wide array of EPDs can occur either alone or concurrent with pneumonia. Some EPDs (eg, intra-abdominal abscesses, osteomyelitis) markedly worsen the prognosis for survival, and can develop in the face of successful management of pneumonia. There is great need to develop means for preventing disease. Understanding the mechanisms of virulence of R. equi is critical for developing preventive strategies. It is clear that interactions occur between gene products of the virulence-associated plasmid and chromosomal gene products that modulate virulence. The picture that has emerged is one of a soil bacterium whose disease-causing capabilities were dramatically expanded through the acquisition of foreign DNA that provided critical novel virulence factors and further altered the expression of pre-existing chromosomal genes to promote adaptation as a pathogen of foals. These virulence factors represent target candidates for developing live attenuated vaccines. Finally, development of a vaccine against R. equi is dependent upon stimulating an effective immune response to key antigens of the organism. Unfortunately, an effective vaccine remains elusive because of the complexity of the immune response to R. equi and the challenges posed by limitations of some elements of the immune response of young foals. Despite these challenges, there are observational and experimental data that allow hope for the development of an effective vaccine. A recent manuscript indicates that genes involved in the steroid catabolic pathway are promising targets for the development of a live-attenuated vaccine against R. equi infections.[102]

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Clinical Manifestations
  4. Pathogenesis and Virulence
  5. Summary
  6. References
  • 1
    Zink MC, Yager JA, Smart NL. Corynebacterium equi infections in horses, 1958–1984: A review of 131 cases. Can J Vet Res 1986;27:213217.
  • 2
    Slovis NM, McCracken JL, Mundy G. How to use thoracic ultrasound to screen foals for Rhodococcus equi at affected farms. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 2005;51:274278.
  • 3
    Venner M, Rodiger A, Laemmer M, et al. Failure of antimicrobial therapy to accelerate spontaneous healing of subclinical pulmonary abscesses on a farm with endemic infections caused by Rhodococcus equi. Vet J 2011. In press.
  • 4
    Falcon J, Smith BP, O'Brien TR, et al. Clinical and radiographic findings in Corynebacterium equi pneumonia of foals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985;186:593599.
  • 5
    Chaffin MK, Cohen ND, Martens RJ, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of gallium maltolate for chemoprophylaxis against pneumonia caused by Rhodococcus equi infection in foals. Am J Vet Res 2011;72:945957.
  • 6
    Reuss SM, Chaffin MK, Cohen ND. Extrapulmonary disorders associated with Rhodococcus equi infection in foals: 150 cases (1987-2007). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2009;235:855863.
  • 7
    Giguère S, Jacks S, Roberts GD, et al. Retrospective comparison of azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin for the treatment of foals with Rhodococcus equi pneumonia. J Vet Intern Med 2004;18:568573.
  • 8
    Stratton-Phelps M, Wilson WD, Gardner IA. Risk of adverse effects in pneumonic foals treated with erythromycin versus other antibiotics: 143 cases (1986-1996). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000;217:6873.
  • 9
    Valdes A, Johnson JR. Septic pleuritis and abdominal abscess formation caused by Rhodococcus equi in a foal. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:960963.
  • 10
    Hines MT. Rhodococcus equi. In: Sellon DC, Long MT, eds. Equine Infectious Diseases. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2007:281295.
  • 11
    Sweeney CR, Sweeney RW, Divers TJ. Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in 48 foals: Response to antimicrobial therapy. Vet Microbiol 1987;14:329336.
  • 12
    Kenney DG, Robbins SC, Prescott JF, et al. Development of reactive arthritis and resistance to erythromycin and rifampin in a foal during treatment for Rhodococcus equi pneumonia. Equine Vet J 1994;26:246248.
  • 13
    Madison JB, Scarratt WK. Immune-mediated polysynovitis in four foals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988;192:15811584.
  • 14
    Giguère S, Hondalus MK, Yager JA, et al. Role of the 85-kilobase plasmid and plasmid-encoded virulence-associated protein A in intracellular survival and virulence of Rhodococcus equi. Infect Immun 1999;67:35483557.
  • 15
    Chaffin MK, Honnas CM, Crabill MR, et al. Cauda equina syndrome, diskospondylitis, and a paravertebral abscess caused by Rhodococcus equi in a foal. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995;206:215220.
  • 16
    Janicek JC, Kramer J, Coates JR, et al. Intracranial abscess caused by Rhodococcus equi infection in a foal. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006;228:251253.
  • 17
    Barton MD, Embury DH. Studies of the pathogenesis of Rhodococcus equi infection in foals. Aust Vet J 1987;64:332339.
  • 18
    Johnson JA, Prescott JF, Markham RJ. The pathology of experimental Corynebacterium equi infection in foals following intragastric challenge. Vet Pathol 1983;20:450459.
  • 19
    Horowitz ML, Cohen ND, Takai S, et al. Application of Sartwell's model (lognormal distribution of incubation periods) to age at onset and age at death of foals with Rhodococcus equi pneumonia as evidence of perinatal infection. J Vet Intern Med 2001;15:171175.
  • 20
    Giguère S, Gaskin JM, Miller C, et al. Evaluation of a commercially available hyperimmune plasma product for prevention of naturally acquired pneumonia caused by Rhodococcus equi in foals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;220:5963.
  • 21
    Wada R, Kamada M, Anzai T, et al. Pathogenicity and virulence of Rhodococcus equi in foals following intratracheal challenge. Vet Microbiol 1997;56:301312.
  • 22
    Takai S, Sekizaki T, Ozawa T, et al. Association between a large plasmid and 15- to 17-kilodalton antigens in virulent Rhodococcus equi. Infect Immun 1991;59:40564060.
  • 23
    Tkachuk-Saad O, Prescott J. Rhodococcus equi plasmids: Isolation and partial characterization. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:26962700.
  • 24
    Takai S, Madarame H, Matsumoto C, et al. Pathogenesis of Rhodococcus equi infection in mice: Roles of virulence plasmids and granulomagenic activity of bacteria. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1995;11:181190.
  • 25
    Hondalus MK, Mosser DM. Survival and replication of Rhodococcus equi in macrophages. Infect Immun 1994;62:41674175.
  • 26
    Letek M, Ocampo-Sosa AA, Sanders M, et al. Evolution of the Rhodococcus equi vap pathogenicity island seen through comparison of host-associated vapA and vapB virulence plasmids. J Bacteriol 2008;190:57975805.
  • 27
    Takai S, Hines SA, Sekizaki T, et al. DNA sequence and comparison of virulence plasmids from Rhodococcus equi ATCC 33701 and 103. Infect Immun 2000;68:68406847.
  • 28
    Takai S, Iie M, Watanabe Y, et al. Virulence-associated 15- to 17-kilodalton antigens in Rhodococcus equi: Temperature-dependent expression and location of the antigens. Infect Immun 1992;60:29952997.
  • 29
    Tan C, Prescott JF, Patterson MC, et al. Molecular characterization of a lipid-modified virulence-associated protein of Rhodococcus equi and its potential in protective immunity. Can J Vet Res 1995;59:5159.
  • 30
    Jain S, Bloom BR, Hondalus MK. Deletion of vapA encoding Virulence Associated Protein A attenuates the intracellular actinomycete Rhodococcus equi. Mol Microbiol 2003;50:115128.
  • 31
    Coulson GB, Agarwal S, Hondalus MK. Characterization of the role of the pathogenicity island and vapG in the virulence of the intracellular actinomycete pathogen Rhodococcus equi. Infect Immun 2010;78:33233334.
  • 32
    von BK, Polidori M, Becken U, et al. Rhodococcus equi virulence-associated protein A is required for diversion of phagosome biogenesis but not for cytotoxicity. Infect Immun 2009;77:56765681.
  • 33
    Ren J, Prescott JF. The effect of mutation on Rhodococcus equi virulence plasmid gene expression and mouse virulence. Vet Microbiol 2004;103:219230.
  • 34
    Russell DA, Byrne GA, O'Connell EP, et al. The LysR-type transcriptional regulator VirR is required for expression of the virulence gene vapA of Rhodococcus equi ATCC 33701. J Bacteriol 2004;186:55765584.
  • 35
    Letek M, Gonzalez P, Macarthur I, et al. The genome of a pathogenic rhodococcus: Cooptive virulence underpinned by key gene acquisitions. PLoS Genet 2010;6:e1001145, 117.
  • 36
    Sutcliffe IC. Cell envelope composition and organisation in the genus Rhodococcus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1998;74:4958.
  • 37
    Gotoh K, Mitsuyama M, Imaizumi S, et al. Mycolic acid-containing glycolipid as a possible virulence factor of Rhodococcus equi for mice. Microbiol Immunol 1991;35:175185.
  • 38
    Munoz-Elias EJ, McKinney JD. Mycobacterium tuberculosis isocitrate lyases 1 and 2 are jointly required for in vivo growth and virulence. Nat Med 2005;11:638644.
  • 39
    Wall DM, Duffy PS, Dupont C, et al. Isocitrate lyase activity is required for virulence of the intracellular pathogen Rhodococcus equi. Infect Immun 2005;73:67366741.
  • 40
    Macarthur I, Parreira VR, Lepp D, et al. The sensor kinase MprB is required for Rhodococcus equi virulence. Vet Microbiol 2011;147:133141.
  • 41
    Pei Y, Parreira V, Nicholson VM, et al. Mutation and virulence assessment of chromosomal genes of Rhodococcus equi 103. Can J Vet Res 2007;71:17.
  • 42
    Hondalus MK, Diamond MS, Rosenthal LA, et al. The intracellular bacterium Rhodococcus equi requires Mac-1 to bind to mammalian cells. Infect Immun 1993;61:29192929.
  • 43
    Garton NJ, Gilleron M, Brando T, et al. A novel lipoarabinomannan from the equine pathogen Rhodococcus equi. Structure and effect on macrophage cytokine production. J Biol Chem 2002;277:3172231733.
  • 44
    Fernandez-Mora E, Polidori M, Luhrmann A, et al. Maturation of Rhodococcus equi-containing vacuoles is arrested after completion of the early endosome stage. Traffic 2005;6:635653.
  • 45
    Toyooka K, Takai S, Kirikae T. Rhodococcus equi can survive a phagolysosomal environment in macrophages by suppressing acidification of the phagolysosome. J Med Microbiol 2005;54:10071015.
  • 46
    Zink MC, Yager JA, Prescott JF, et al. Electron microscopic investigation of intracellular events after ingestion of Rhodococcus equi by foal alveolar macrophages. Vet Microbiol 1987;14:295305.
  • 47
    Benoit S, Benachour A, Taouji S, et al. H(2)O(2), which causes macrophage-related stress, triggers induction of expression of virulence-associated plasmid determinants in Rhodococcus equi. Infect Immun 2002;70:37683776.
  • 48
    Ren J, Prescott JF. Analysis of virulence plasmid gene expression of intra-macrophage and in vitro grown Rhodococcus equi ATCC 33701. Vet Microbiol 2003;94:167182.
  • 49
    Luhrmann A, Mauder N, Sydor T, et al. Necrotic death of Rhodococcus equi-infected macrophages is regulated by virulence-associated plasmids. Infect Immun 2004;72:853862.
  • 50
    Hietala SK, Ardans AA. Interaction of Rhodococcus equi with phagocytic cells from R. equi-exposed and non-exposed foals. Vet Microbiol 1987;14:307320.
  • 51
    Darrah PA, Hondalus MK, Chen Q, et al. Cooperation between reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates in killing of Rhodococcus equi by activated macrophages. Infect Immun 2000;68:35873593.
  • 52
    Kasuga-Aoki H, Takai S, Sasaki Y, et al. Tumour necrosis factor and interferon-gamma are required in host resistance against virulent Rhodococcus equi infection in mice: Cytokine production depends on the virulence levels of R. equi. Immunology 1999;96:122127.
  • 53
    Martens RJ, Cohen ND, Jones SL, et al. Protective role of neutrophils in mice experimentally infected with Rhodococcus equi. Infect Immun 2005;73:70407042.
  • 54
    Martens JG, Martens RJ, Renshaw HW. Rhodococcus (Corynebacterium) equi: Bactericidal capacity of neutrophils from neonatal and adult horses. Am J Vet Res 1988;49:295299.
  • 55
    Takai S, Morozumi Y, Higashiyama S, et al. Nitroblue tetrazolium reduction by neutrophils of newborn foals, adult horses, and a foal infected with Rhodococcus (Corynebacterium) equi. Jpn J Vet Sci 1986;48:405408.
  • 56
    Yager JA, Foster SF, Zink MC, et al. In vitro bactericidal efficacy of equine polymorphonuclear leukocytes against Corynebacterium equi. Am J Vet Res 1986;47:438440.
  • 57
    Hietala SK, Ardans AA. Neutrophil phagocytic and serum opsonic response of the foal to Corynebacterium equi. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1987;14:279294.
  • 58
    Yager JA, Duder CK, Prescott JF, et al. The interaction of Rhodococcus equi and foal neutrophils in vitro. Vet Microbiol 1987;14:287294.
  • 59
    Yager JA, Prescott CA, Kramar DP, et al. The effect of experimental infection with Rhodococcus equi on immunodeficient mice. Vet Microbiol 1991;28:363376.
  • 60
    Kanaly ST, Hines SA, Palmer GH. Cytokine modulation alters pulmonary clearance of Rhodococcus equi and development of granulomatous pneumonia. Infect Immun 1995;63:30373041.
  • 61
    Madarame H, Takai S, Matsumoto C, et al. Virulent and avirulent Rhodococcus equi infection in T-cell deficient athymic nude mice: Pathologic, bacteriologic and immunologic responses. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1997;17:251262.
  • 62
    Ross TL, Balson GA, Miners JS, et al. Role of CD4 + , CD8 +  and double negative T-cells in the protection of SCID/beige mice against respiratory challenge with Rhodococcus equi. Can J Vet Res 1996;60:186192.
  • 63
    Kanaly ST, Hines SA, Palmer GH. Failure of pulmonary clearance of Rhodococcus equi infection in CD4 +  T-lymphocyte-deficient transgenic mice. Infect Immun 1993;61:49294932.
  • 64
    Nordmann P, Ronco E, Nauciel C. Role of T-lymphocyte subsets in Rhodococcus equi infection. Infect Immun 1992;60:27482752.
  • 65
    Kanaly ST, Hines SA, Palmer GH. Transfer of a CD4 +  Th1 cell line to nude mice effects clearance of Rhodococcus equi from the lung. Infect Immun 1996;64:11261132.
  • 66
    Hines SA, Stone DM, Hines MT, et al. Clearance of virulent but not avirulent Rhodococcus equi from the lungs of adult horses is associated with intracytoplasmic gamma interferon production by CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003;10:208215.
  • 67
    Lopez AM, Hines MT, Palmer GH, et al. Identification of pulmonary T-lymphocyte and serum antibody isotype responses associated with protection against Rhodococcus equi. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2002;9:12701276.
  • 68
    Patton KM, McGuire TC, Fraser DG, et al. Rhodococcus equi-infected macrophages are recognized and killed by CD8 +  T lymphocytes in a major histocompatibility complex class I-unrestricted fashion. Infect Immun 2004;72:70737083.
  • 69
    Harris SP, Fujiwara N, Mealey RH, et al. Identification of Rhodococcus equi lipids recognized by host cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Microbiology 2010;156:18361847.
  • 70
    Patton KM, McGuire TC, Hines MT, et al. Rhodococcus equi-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in immune horses and development in asymptomatic foals. Infect Immun 2005;73:20832093.
  • 71
    Pargass IS, Wills TB, Davis WC, et al. The influence of age and Rhodococcus equi infection on CD1 expression by equine antigen presenting cells. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2009;130:197209.
  • 72
    Adkins B, Leclerc C, Marshall-Clarke S. Neonatal adaptive immunity comes of age. Nat Rev Immunol 2004;4:553564.
  • 73
    Flaminio MJ, Nydam DV, Marquis H, et al. Foal monocyte-derived dendritic cells become activated upon Rhodococcus equi infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2009;16:176183.
  • 74
    Boyd NK, Cohen ND, Lim WS, et al. Temporal changes in cytokine expression of foals during the first month of life. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2003;92:7585.
  • 75
    Breathnach CC, Sturgill-Wright T, Stiltner JL, et al. Foals are interferon gamma-deficient at birth. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2006;112:199209.
  • 76
    Nerren JR, Martens RJ, Payne S, et al. Age-related changes in cytokine expression by neutrophils of foals stimulated with virulent Rhodococcus equi in vitro. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2009;127:212219.
  • 77
    Liu T, Nerren J, Liu M, et al. Basal and stimulus-induced cytokine expression is selectively impaired in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of newborn foals. Vaccine 2009;27:674683.
  • 78
    Ryan C, Giguère S, Hagen J, et al. Effect of age and mitogen on the frequency of interleukin-4 and interferon gamma secreting cells in foals and adult horses as assessed by an equine-specific ELISPOT assay. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2010;133:6671.
  • 79
    Ryan C, Giguère S. Equine neonates have attenuated humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to a killed adjuvanted vaccine compared to adult horses. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2010;17:18961902.
  • 80
    Wagner B, Burton A, Ainsworth D. Interferon-gamma, interleukin-4 and interleukin-10 production by T helper cells reveals intact Th1 and regulatory T(R)1 cell activation and a delay of the Th2 cell response in equine neonates and foals. Vet Res 2010;41:47.
  • 81
    Jacks S, Giguère S, Crawford PC, et al. Experimental infection of neonatal foals with Rhodococcus equi triggers adult-like gamma interferon induction. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2007;14:669677.
  • 82
    Liu M, Liu T, Bordin A, et al. Activation of foal neutrophils at different ages by CpG oligodeoxynucleotides and Rhodococcus equi. Cytokine 2009;48:280289.
  • 83
    Ryan C, Giguère S, Fultz L, et al. Effects of two commercially available immunostimulants on leukocyte function of foals following ex vivo exposure to Rhodococcus equi. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2010;138:198205.
  • 84
    Sturgill TL, Strong D, Rashid C, et al. Effect of Propionibacterium acnes-containing immunostimulant on interferon-gamma (IFNgamma) production in the neonatal foal. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2011;141:124127.
  • 85
    Sturgill TL, Giguère S, Franklin RP, et al. Effects of inactivated parapoxvirus ovis on the cumulative incidence of pneumonia and cytokine secretion in foals on a farm with endemic infections caused by Rhodococcus equi. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2011;140:237243.
  • 86
    Caston SS, McClure SR, Martens RJ, et al. Effect of hyperimmune plasma on the severity of pneumonia caused by Rhodococcus equi in experimentally infected foals. Vet Ther 2006;7:361375.
  • 87
    Martens RJ, Martens JG, Fiske RA. Rhodococcus equi foal pneumonia: Pathogenesis and immunoprophylaxis. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1989;35:189213.
  • 88
    Perkins GA, Yeagar A, Erb HN, et al. Survival of foals with experimentally induced Rhodococcus equi infection given either hyperimmune plasma containing R. equi antibody or normal equine plasma. Vet Ther 2001;3:334346.
  • 89
    Chirino-Trejo JM, Prescott JF, Yager JA. Protection of foals against experimental Rhodococcus equi pneumonia by oral immunization. Can J Vet Res 1987;51:444447.
  • 90
    Hooper-McGrevy KE, Wilkie BN, Prescott JF. Virulence-associated protein-specific serum immunoglobulin G-isotype expression in young foals protected against Rhodococcus equi pneumonia by oral immunization with virulent R. equi. Vaccine 2005;23:57605767.
  • 91
    Harris SP, Hines MT, Mealey RH, et al. Early development of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in neonatal foals following oral inoculation with Rhodococcus equi. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2011;14:312316.
  • 92
    Madigan JE, Hietala S, Muller N. Protection against naturally acquired Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals by administration of hyperimmune plasma. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1991;44:571578.
  • 93
    Martens RJ, Martens JG, Fiske RA. Failure of passive immunisation by colostrum from immunised mares to protect foals against Rhodococcus equi pneumonia. Equine Vet J 1991;12(Suppl):1922.
  • 94
    Cauchard J, Sevin C, Ballet JJ, et al. Foal IgG and opsonizing anti-Rhodococcus equi antibodies after immunization of pregnant mares with a protective VapA candidate vaccine. Vet Microbiol 2004;104:7381.
  • 95
    Oliveira AF, Ruas LP, Cardoso SA, et al. Vaccination of mice with salmonella expressing VapA: Mucosal and systemic Th1 responses provide protection against Rhodococcus equi infection. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e8644.
  • 96
    Haghighi HR, Prescott JF. Assessment in mice of vapA-DNA vaccination against Rhodococcus equi infection. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2005;104:215225.
  • 97
    Lopez AM, Hines MT, Palmer GH, et al. Analysis of anamnestic immune responses in adult horses and priming in neonates induced by a DNA vaccine expressing the vapA gene of Rhodococcus equi. Vaccine 2003;21:38153825.
  • 98
    Lopez AM, Townsend HG, Allen AL, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a live-attenuated auxotrophic candidate vaccine against the intracellular pathogen Rhodococcus equi. Vaccine 2008;26:9981009.
  • 99
    Pei Y, Nicholson V, Woods K, et al. Immunization by intrabronchial administration to 1-week-old foals of an unmarked double gene disruption strain of Rhodococcus equi strain 103 + . Vet Microbiol 2007;125:100110.
  • 100
    Kohler AK, Stone DM, Hines MT, et al. Rhodococcus equi secreted antigens are immunogenic and stimulate a type 1 recall response in the lungs of horses immune to R. equi infection. Infect Immun 2003;71:63296337.
  • 101
    Hong Y, Hondalus MK. Site-specific integration of Streptomyces PhiC31 integrase-based vectors in the chromosome of Rhodococcus equi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2008;287:6368.
  • 102
    van der Geize R, Grommen AWF, Hessels GI, et al. The steroid catabolic pathway of the intracellular pathogen Rhodococcus equi is important for pathogenesis and a target for vaccine development. PLoS Pathogens 2011;7:e1002181. Available at www.plospathogens.org.