Bartonella spp. DNA in Cardiac Tissues from Dogs in Colorado and Wyoming
Article first published online: 3 MAY 2011
Copyright © 2011 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Volume 25, Issue 3, pages 613–616, May/June 2011
How to Cite
Fenimore, A., Varanat, M., Maggi, R., Schultheiss, P., Breitschwerdt, E. and Lappin, M. R. (2011), Bartonella spp. DNA in Cardiac Tissues from Dogs in Colorado and Wyoming. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 25: 613–616. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2011.0722.x
- Issue published online: 3 MAY 2011
- Article first published online: 3 MAY 2011
- Submitted October 26, 2010; Revised January 14, 2011; Accepted March 2, 2011.
- Bartonella species;
- Blood cultures;
- Polymerase chain reaction assays
Background: Several Bartonella species (spp.) have been identified in dogs diagnosed with infectious endocarditis (IE) or myocarditis.
Objective: To interrogate cardiac tissues of dogs with suspected IE for the presence of Bartonella spp. DNA of dogs in the Rocky Mountain states.
Animals: Nine dogs with a clinical diagnosis of endocarditis from January 1990 to June 2008 were included.
Methods: In this retrospective study, medical records at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital were searched. Animals were excluded if there was no diagnosis of IE in the original necropsy report. Paraffin embedded tissue blocks and medical records were available from 9 dogs. Total DNA was extracted from the cardiac tissues and assessed for Bartonella spp. DNA by 3 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. For positive samples, the Bartonella spp. were determined by genetic sequencing or fluorogenic real-time PCR.
Results: Bartonella henselae DNA was amplified from the tissues of 7 dogs; Bartonella vinsonii subsp berkhoffii DNA was amplified concurrently from 3 dogs. Six dogs were from Colorado and 1 was from Wyoming. Flea or tick infestations were reported in 2 dogs.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance: Bartonella spp. should be on the differential list for dogs in the Rocky Mountain states. The results emphasize the need for routine use of external parasite control products even in regions perceived to have low risk for flea and tick infestations.