SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Nandedkar SD, Sanders DB, Stålberg EV. Automatic analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern. Part II: Findings in control subjects and in some neuromuscular diseases. Muscle Nerve 1986;9:491500.
  • 2
    Nandedkar SD, Barkhaus PE, Sanders DB, Stålberg EV. Analysis of amplitude and area of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988;69:561567.
  • 3
    Nandedkar SD, Sanders DB. Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit potentials. Muscle Nerve 1988b;11:151159.
  • 4
    Stålberg E, Chu J, Bril V, et al. Automatic analysis of the EMG interference pattern. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983;56:672681.
  • 5
    Nirkko AC, Rösler KM, Hess CW. Sensitivity and specificity of needle electromyography: A prospective study comparing automated interference pattern analysis with single motor unit potential analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;97:110.
  • 6
    Kimura J. Techniques to assess muscle function: Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle. In: KimuraJ, ed. Electrodiagnosis in Diseases of Nerve and Muscle Principles and Practise, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001:307338.
  • 7
    Kimura J. Types of electromyographic abnormalities: Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle. In: KimuraJ, ed. Electrodiagnosis in Diseases of Nerve and Muscle Principles and Practise, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001:339369.
  • 8
    Daube JR, Rubin DI. Needle electromyography. Muscle Nerve 2009;39:244270.
  • 9
    Wijnberg ID, Back W, de Jong M, et al. The role of electromyography in clinical diagnosis of neuromuscular locomotor problems in the horse. Equine Vet J 2004;36:718722.
  • 10
    Wijnberg ID, Back W, van der Kolk JH. Use if EMG examination in 7 horses to localize cervical lesions. In: Proceedings of the 41st British Equine Veterinary Association Congress, Newmarket, Equine Vet J Ltd, 2002:205.
  • 11
    Wijnberg ID. Diagnostic Possibilities of EMG Needle Examination in the Horse. Utrecht: Utrecht University, ISBN 90-393-3034-4; 2002. Thesis.
  • 12
    Wijnberg ID, Franssen H, van der Kolk JH. Quantitative motor unit action potential analysis of the normal subclavian muscle in the horse. Am J Vet Res 2002;63:198203.
  • 13
    Wijnberg ID, Franssen H, van der Kolk JH, et al. Quantitative motor unit action potential analysis of skeletal muscles in the Warmblood horse. Equine Vet J 2002;34:556561.
  • 14
    Wijnberg ID, Franssen H, van der Kolk JH. Influence of age of horse on results of quantitative electromyographic needle examination of skeletal muscles in Dutch Warmblood horses. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:7075.
  • 15
    Wijnberg ID, van der Kolk JH, Franssen H, et al. Needle electromyography in the horse compared with its principles in man: A review. Equine Vet J 2003;35:917.
  • 16
    Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Scheel U, Buchthal F. Diagnostic yield of analysis of the pattern of electrical activity of muscle and of individual motor units action potentials in myopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1976;39:742750.
  • 17
    Sonoo M, Stalberg E. The ability of MUP parameters to discriminate between normal and neurogenic MUPs in concentric EMG: Analysis of the MUP ‘thickness’ and the proposal of ‘size index’. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophys 1993;89:291303.
  • 18
    Blijham PJ, Hengstman GJD, Dara Hama-Amin A, et al. Needle electomyographic findings in 98 patients with myositis. Eur J Neurol 2006;55:183188.
  • 19
    Wijnberg ID, van Dam KG, de Graaf-Roelfsema E, et al. (Over) trainings effects on quantitative electromyography and muscle enzyme activities in Standardbred horses. J Appl Physiol 2008;105:17461753.
  • 20
    Wijnberg ID, Graubner C, Back W, et al Quantitative motor unit action potential analysis of the serratus muscle in 28 Warmbloods suspected of cervical lesions. In: Proceedings 28th BEVA congress, Newmarket, Equine Vet J Ltd, 2009:113–114.
  • 21
    Buchthal F, Pinelli P. Analysis of muscle action potentials as a diagnostic aid in neuromuscular disorders. Acta Med Scand 1952;266 (Suppl 142):315327.
  • 22
    Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Scheel U, Buchthal F. Diagnostic yield of analysis of the pattern of electrical activity of muscle and of individual motor units action potentials in neurogenic involvement. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1977;40:544554.
  • 23
    Steward CR, Nandedkar SD, Massey JM, et al. Evaluation of an automatic methods of measuring features of motor unit action potentials. Muscle Nerve 1989;12:141148.
  • 24
    Fuglsang-Frederiksen A. The role of different EMG methods in evaluating myopathy. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:11731189.
  • 25
    Lehmann M, Jakob E, Gastmann U, et al. Unaccustomed high mileage compared to intensity training-related neuromuscular excitability in distance runners. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1995;70:457461.
  • 26
    Gabriel DA, Kamen G, Frost G. Neural adaptations to resistive exercise: Mechanisms and recommendations for training practices. Sports Med 2006;36:133149.
  • 27
    Podnar SM, Vodusek DB, Stålberg EV. Standardization of anal sphincter electromyography: Normative data. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:220227.
  • 28
    Thomas CK, Broton JG, Calancie B. Motor unit forces and recruitment patters after cervical spinal cord injury. Muscle Nerve 1997;20:212220.
  • 29
    Moore BR, Holbrook TC, Stefanacci JD, et al. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and myelography in six horses with cervical stenotic myelopathy. Equine Vet J 1992;24:197202.
  • 30
    Ricardi G, Dyson S J. Forelimb lameness associated with radiographic abnormalities of the cervical vertebrae. Equine Vet J 1993;25:422426.
  • 31
    Marks D. Cervical nerve root impingement in a horse, treated by epidural injection of corticosteroids. J Equine Vet Sci 1999;19:399401.
  • 32
    Kawai M, Minami Y, Sayama Y, et al. Muscle fiber population and biochemical properties of whole body muscles of Thoroughbred horses. Anat Rec 2009;292:16631669.
  • 33
    Payne RC, Veenman P, Wilson AM. The role of extrinsic thoracic limb muscles in equine locomotion. J Anat 2005;206:193204.