A BIOMASS FLOW APPROACH TO POPULATION MODELS AND FOOD WEBS
Article first published online: 30 DEC 2011
Copyright ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Natural Resource Modeling
Special Issue: 25 Years of Natural Resource Modeling: Perspectives of Then and Now
Volume 25, Issue 1, pages 93–121, February 2012
How to Cite
GETZ, W. M. (2012), A BIOMASS FLOW APPROACH TO POPULATION MODELS AND FOOD WEBS. Natural Resource Modeling, 25: 93–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2011.00101.x
- Issue published online: 30 DEC 2011
- Article first published online: 30 DEC 2011
- Accepted 16th June 2011.
- Trophic models;
- functional response;
- pathogen dynamics;
Abstract The dominant differential equation paradigm for modeling the population dynamics of species interacting in the framework of a food web retains at its core the basic prey-predator and competition models formulated by Alfred J. Lotka (1880–1945) and Vito Volterra (1860–1940) nearly nine decades ago. This paradigm lacks a trophic-level-independent formulation of population growth leading to ambiguities in how to treat populations that are simultaneously both prey and predator. Also, this paradigm does not fundamentally include inertial (i.e., change resisting) processes needed to account for the response of populations to fluctuating resource environments. Here I present an approach that corrects both these deficits and provides a unified framework for accounting for biomass transformation in food webs that include both live and dead components of all species in the system. This biomass transformation formulation (BTW) allows for a unified treatment of webs that include consumers of both live and dead material—both carnivores and carcasivores, herbivores and detritivores—and incorporates scavengers, parasites, and other neglected food web consumption categories in a coherent manner. I trace how BTW is an outgrowth of the metaphysiological growth modeling paradigm and I provide a general compact formulation of BTW in terms of a three-variable differential equation formulation for each species in the food web: viz., live biomass, dead biomass, and a food-intake-related measure called deficit-stress. I then illustrate the application of this new paradigm to provide insights into two-species competition in variable environments and discuss application of BTW to food webs that incorporate parasites and pathogens.