I thank Sarah Binder and Joshua D. Clinton for their guidance regarding this project. I am additionally grateful for comments from Larry Bartels, Deborah Beim, Nolan McCarty, Jessica Trounstine, participants of the Princeton Politics American Graduate Research Seminar, and panel members at the 2010 SPSA annual meeting.
The Responsiveness of Direct and Indirect Elections
Article first published online: 26 OCT 2012
© 2012 The Comparative Legislative Research Center of The University of Iowa
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Volume 37, Issue 4, pages 509–532, November 2012
How to Cite
Rogers, S. (2012), The Responsiveness of Direct and Indirect Elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 37: 509–532. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2012.00060.x
- Issue published online: 26 OCT 2012
- Article first published online: 26 OCT 2012
Previous research argues the Seventeenth Amendment made Senate elections more responsive. To make this claim, existing work compares the vote-seat relationships of direct and indirect elections before and after the Seventeenth Amendment. I argue this approach is problematic because it does not account for regional variation and compares elections from different time periods using presidential instead of Senate vote. I overcome these problems by simulating indirect elections using state legislatures’ partisan compositions to evaluate the responsiveness of direct and indirect elections after the Seventeenth Amendment. With this counterfactual approach, my findings suggest direct elections are not necessary for electoral responsiveness.