SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adamowicz, W.; Swait, J.; Boxall, P.; Louviere, J.; and Williams, M. 1997. Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32:6584.
  • Ayuntamiento de Madrid. 2008. Mapa del ruido 2006. Madrid: Ayuntamiento de Madrid.
  • Ayuntamiento de Madrid. 2009a. Plan de acción del area de gobierno de urbanismo y vivienda para la revitalización del centro urbano 2008–2011 [Area action plan for town planning and housing for the 2008–2011 downtown revitalization], Área de Gobierno de Urbanismo y Vivienda, Madrid. Madrid: Ayuntamiento de Madrid
  • Ayuntamiento de Madrid. 2009b. Average daily intensity of urban traffic report. Madrid: Ayuntamiento de Madrid
  • Ayuntamiento de Madrid. 2010. Contabilidad municipal de la Ciudad de Madrid: Base 2002, Serie 2000–2008(1ªe) [Accounting of the City of Madrid, Base 2002. 2000–2008 series (1 ª e),]. Madrid: Dirección General de Estadística.
  • Ballas, D., and Tranmer, M. 2012. Happy places or happy people? A multilevel modeling approach to the analysis of happiness and well-being. International Regional Science Review 35:70102
  • Baranzini, A., and Ramírez. J. V. 2005. Paying for quietness: The impact of noise on Geneva rents. Urban Studies 42:633646.
  • Baranzini, A.; Schaerer, C.; and Thalmann, P. 2010. Using measured instead of perceived noise in hedonic models. Transportation Research Part D 15:473482.
  • Baxter, J., and Greenlaw, C. 2005. Explaining perceptions of a technological environmental hazard using comparative analysis. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 49:6180.
  • Berezansky, B.; Portnov, B. A.; and Barzilai, B. 2010. Objective vs. perceived air pollution as a factor of housing pricing: A case study of the Greater Haifa Metropolitan Area. Journal of Real Estate Literature 18:99122.
  • Beron, K. J.; Murdoch, J. C.; and Thayer, M. A. 1999. Hierarchical linear models with application to air pollution in the South Coast Air Basin. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81:11231127.
  • Bickel, P.; Schmid, S.; Tervonen, J.; Hämekoski, K.; Otterström, T.; Anton, P.; Enei, R.; Leone, G.; van Donselaar, P.; and Carmigchelt, H. 2002. Environmental marginal cost case studies, UNITE (UNIfication of accounts and marginal costs for Transport Efficiency). Stuttgart: IER, University of Stuttgart, January 2003.
  • Boyle, M. A., and Kiel, K. A. 2001. A survey of house price hedonic studies of the impact of environmental externalities. Journal of Real Estate Literature 9:117144.
  • Brereton, F.; Clinch, P.; and Ferreira, S. 2007. Happiness, geography and the environment. Ecological Economics 65:386396.
  • Brody, S. D.; Highfield, W. E.; and Peck, B. M. 2005. Exploring the mosaic of perceptions for water quality across watersheds in San Antonio, Texas. Landscape and Urban Planning 73:200214.
  • Brody, S. D.; Peck, B. M.; and Highfield, W. E. 2004. Examining localized patterns of air quality perception in Texas: A spatial and statistical analysis. Risk Analysis 24:15611574.
  • Brown, G. 2004. Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society and Natural Resources 18:1739.
  • Brown, G., and Raymond, C. 2007. The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Towards mapping place attachment. Applied Geography 27:89111.
  • Buijs, A. E.; Elands, B. H. M.; and Langers, F. 2009. No wilderness for immigrants: Cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning 91:113123.
  • Buttimer, A., and Seamon, D. 1980. The human experience of space and place. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  • Cheshire, P., and Sheppard, S. 1998. Estimating the demand for housing, land, and neighborhood characteristics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 60:357382.
  • Chombart de Lauwe, P. H. 1952. Paris et l'agglomération parisienne (vol. 2). P.U.F. Paris: Bibliotheque de Sociologie Contemporaine.
  • Conrad, E.; Christie, M.; and Fazey, J. 2011. Understanding public perceptions of landscape: A case study from Gozo, Malta. Applied Geography 31:159170.
  • Cosgrove, D. 1998. Social formulation and symbolic landscape. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Daniel, T. C. 2001. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 54:267281.
  • Djurdjevic, D.; Eugster, C.; and Haase, R. 2008. Estimation of hedonic models using a multilevel approach: An application to the Swiss rental market. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 144:679701.
  • European Commission. 1996. Future noise policy—European Commission green paper. Report COM(96) 540 final. Brussels: European Commission.
  • European Environment Agency (EEA). 2000. Are we moving in the right direction? Indicators on transport and environment integration in the EU. Environmental issue report, 12/2000. Copenhagen: EEA.
  • Falzone, K. L. 1999. Airport noise pollution: Is there a solution in sight? Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 26:769807.
  • Goldstein, H. 2003, Multilevel statistical models. London: Arnold.
  • Goodman, A. C., and Thibodeau, T. G. 2003. Housing market segmentation and hedonic prediction accuracy. Journal of Housing Economics 12:181201.
  • Hui, E. C. M.; Chau, C. K.; Pun, L.; and Law, M. Y. 2008. Measuring the neighboring and environmental effects on residential property value: Using spatial weighting matrix. Building and Environment 42:23332343.
  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística, INE. 2008. Callejero del censo electoral 2007. Madrid: INE.
  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística, INE. 2010. Padrón de habitantes. Madrid: INE.
  • Jones, K., and Bullen, N. 1994. Contextual models of urban house prices: A comparison of fixed- and random-coefficient models developed by expansion. Economic Geography 70:252272.
  • Kaltenborn, B. P. 1998. Effects of sense of place on responses to environmental impacts: A study among residents in Svalbard in the Norwegian high Arctic. Applied Geography 18:169189.
  • Layard, R. 2010. Measuring subjective well-being. Science 327:534535.
  • Lee, S-W.; Ellis, C. D.; Kweonb, B-S.; and Honga, S-K. 2008. Relationship between landscape structure and neighborhood satisfaction in urbanized areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 85:6070.
  • Leishman, C. 2009. Spatial change and the structure of urban housing sub-markets. Housing Studies 24:563585.
  • Li, M. M., and Brown, H. J. 1980. Micro-neighborhood externalities and hedonic housing prices. Land Economics 56:125141.
  • Lothian, A. 1999. Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: Is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning 44:177198.
  • Lovejoy, K.; Handy, S.; and Mokhtarian, P. 2010. Neighborhood satisfaction in suburban versus traditional environments: An evaluation of contributing characteristics in eight California neighborhoods. Landscape and Urban Planning 97:3748.
  • Malpezzi, S. 2008. Hedonic pricing models: A selective and applied review. Housing economics and public policy, ed. T. O'Sullivan and K. Gibb , 6789. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Science.
  • Marans, R. W. 2003. Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: The 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning 65:7383.
  • Mieszkowski, P., and Saper, A. M. 1978. An estimate of the effects of airport noise on property values. Journal of Urban Economics 5:425440.
  • Montero, J. M.; Chasco, C.; and Larraz, B. 2010. Building an environmental quality index for a big city: A spatial interpolation approach combined with a distance indicator. Journal of Geographical Systems 12:435459.
  • Muñoz González, B. 2005. Topophilia and topophobia. The home as an evocative place of contradictory emotions. Space and Culture 8:193213.
  • Natori, Y., and Chenoweth, R. 2008. Differences in rural landscape perceptions and preferences between farmers and naturalists. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28:250267.
  • Nelson, J. P. 1979. Airport noise, location rent, and the market for residential amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 6:320331.
  • Nourse, H. O. 1967. The effect of air pollution on house values. Land Economics 43:181189.
  • Ode, A.; Tveit, M. S.; and Fry, G. 2008. Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: Touching base with landscape aesthetic theory. Landscape Research 33:89117.
  • Orford, S. 2000. Modelling spatial structures in local housing market dynamics: A multilevel perspective. Urban Studies 37:16431671.
  • Oswald, A. J., and Wu, S. 2010. Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the U.S.A. Science 327:576579.
  • Palm, R. 1978. Spatial segmentation of the urban housing market. Economic Geography 54:210221.
  • Palmer, J. F. 2004. Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning 69:201218.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., and Bryk, A. S. 2002. Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.:Sage.
  • Ridker, R. G., and Henning, J. A. 1967. The determinants of residential property values with special reference to air-pollution. Review of Economics and Statistics 49:246256.
  • Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 82:3455.
  • Smith, V. K., and Huang, J-C. 1993. Hedonic models and air pollution: Twenty-five years and counting. Environmental and Resource Economics 36:2336.
  • Smith, V. K., and Huang, J-C.. 1995. Can markets value air quality? A meta-analysis of hedonic property value models. Journal of Political Economy 103:209227.
  • Straszheim, M. 1974. Hedonic estimation of housing market prices: A further comment. Review of Economics and Statistics 56:404406.
  • Tuan, Y-F. 1974. Topophilia. A study of environmental perceptions, attitudes, and values. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • van Kamp, I.; Leidelmeijer, K.; Marsmana, G.; and de Hollander, A. 2003. Urban environmental quality and human well-being. Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts: A literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning 65:518.
  • Wagner, M. M., and Gobster, P. H. 2007. Interpreting landscape change: Measured biophysical change and surrounding social context. Landscape and Urban Planning 81:6780.
  • Wardman, M., and Bristow, A. L. 2004. Traffic related noise and air quality valuations: Evidence from stated preference residential choice models. Transportation Research Part D 9:127.
  • World Health Organization. (WHO). 2006. Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide: Global update 2005: Summary of risk assessment. Geneva: WHO Press.