SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • American cutaneous leishmaniasis;
  • Lutzomyia whitmani;
  • Atlantic forest;
  • spatiotemporal distribution

ABSTRACT:

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED

Sand fly populations of different ecological niches in the Amaraji endemic American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (ACL) focus of the Pernambuco Atlantic Forest region of northeastern Brazil were monitored spatiotemporally. Lutzomyia whitmani was dominant in all niches but occurred in smaller numbers in forested locations. L. whitmani was significantly less seasonal than the other species, being present throughout the year while other species were more abundant between February and April. These results suggest that L. whitmani may potentially be the principal vector of ACL in the region, even though the sand fly fauna was diverse: 88% were L.whitmani and 12% belonged to 11 other species. Two other species, L. complexa (1.3%) and L. migonei (0.8%), considered to be ACL vectors in other regions, were also present. This detailed picture of the sand fly population's abundance and spatiotemporal distribution provides a basis for future modeling studies of forecasting sand fly activity patterns and ACL occurence.


INTRODUCTION

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED

In the New World, American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL) is a zoonotic disease caused by different species of Leishmania and it is one of the most important health problems in Brazil, where some 35,000 cases occur each year (Secretaria de Vigilância em Saude, Ministerio da Saude, 2010). In humans, infections may be inapparent, but in others cases the clinical spectrum ranges from localized, often self-healing cutaneous lesions (CLs) to severe and mutilating mucocutaneous lesions (MCL) or diffuse CLs (Grimaldi and Tesh 1993, Carvalho et al. 1994). A particularly high prevalence of ACL has been reported in recent years in Pernambuco state, northeastern Brazil, in the vicinity of remnant patches of Atlantic forest (Brandão-Filho et al. 1999). The rapid increase in cases, coupled with evidence of peridomestic transmission at a number of sites (Campbell-Lendrum et al. 2001), has prompted calls for preventative measures to be added to the national control policy of diagnosis and treatment.

Phlebotomine sand fly species have been incriminated in transmission of ACL in the Americas (Marcondes 2001, Shaw 2002), and both epidemiological and experimental evidence indicate some degree of vector-parasite specificity. The enzootic cycle depends on close sand fly-reservoir contact and is considered a major factor limiting the geographic distribution of the disease. Although finding known vector species in new regions is interesting, detailed studies are required to determine their vectorial importance. An important step in this process is a better understanding of their distribution in different ecological niches during the different seasons of the year.

Lutzomyia whitmani is one of the most important vectors of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in Brazil (Rangel and Lainson 2009) and has been collected in large numbers in the Atlantic Forest region of Pernambuco (in Portuguese Zona da Mata), in the municipality of Amaraji. It has also been found infected naturally with L. (V.) braziliensis in this region and the parasites belong to a zymodeme found in both humans and mammalian reservoir hosts in the same area. These observations add considerable weight to conclusions regarding its importance as a vector of zoonotic ACL cycle in this region (Brandão-Filho et al. 2003, Brito et al. 2009).

The aim of the present study is to provide additional data on the ecology of sand flies in the Amaraji region. We summarize one year's detailed sampling of sand flies in different ecological niches of a highly endemic ACL region in the Atlantic Forest zone of eastern Pernambuco. Unlike similar studies in other foci, our sampling was performed simultaneously at different sites and repeated throughout the year, allowing evaluation of occurrence patterns in both dimensions simultaneously. Only via such intensive sampling is it possible to understand their activity and consequently their vector potential. The present paper is the first major step in the analysis of this extensive data set.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED

Sand flies were captured using ten CDC light traps with incandescent light sources set in different ecological niches during 4 successive days each month. The study was carried out in the localities of Refrigerio and Tranquilidade, in the Amaraji municipality (8o22’59”S 35o27’09”W, 289 m), Pernambuco state (Figure 1). Sampling occurred in nine sessions during 2009 represented by a total of 256 trap-nights. A village or ranch was visited and sampled every second month, which permitted large numbers of sites to be sampled and different types of sites visited in alternating pairs of months. In this area, small patches of rainforest are surrounded by extensive areas of sugar cane and banana plantations, which are the dominant cash crops for the local people. Traps were positioned in places previously chosen, corresponding to sites in remnant forest patches, in plantations, and around houses (peridomicile). Sites for traps were recorded in the field using a hand-held Garmin (eTrex® HC series model) global positioning system, accurate to ∼10 m on the ground. Field samples were stored separately by trap and night, permitting detailed tracking of the spatial dimensions of the occurrence of each individual sand fly captured.

image

Figure 1. Map showing location of study area in Pernambuco, Brazil. Close up image from Google Earth.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Once field sampling was completed each month, each sand fly captured was identified to species. These data were summarized in various manners, visualizing patterns of occurrence of each species through time and space.

We tested for differences in seasonality of occurrences between the most common species and the next-less-common species by the following rarefaction procedure. For the less-common species, we calculated the proportion of positive trap nights for each month, and calculated the standard deviation of these monthly proportions through the year. For the more-common species, of the positive trap-nights, we sub-sampled 100 times positive trap-nights at random in numbers matching the number of positive trap-nights for the less-common species, and calculated the standard deviation of the monthly proportions through the year for each of the 100 replicates. Finally, we compared the observed value for the less-common species with the distribution of rarefied replicate values for the more-common species to establish a one-tailed probability distribution for the comparison. We linked seasonality of sand fly occurrences qualitatively to seasonal climatic variation by comparison with regional climate interpolations at 0.17° spatial resolution (Hijmans et al. 2005).

RESULTS

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED

Table 1 summarizes captures of the various Lutzomyia species over the study region and through the study period. L. whitmani was the dominant species, with 1,191 individuals, constituting 88.0% of the total of sand flies captured. This overwhelming abundance was particularly intense near rural buildings and domiciles, with 93% of the total; in forested situations, L. whitmani still dominated, but with only 42% of the total. The dominance of this species was almost total near rural buildings, as the next-most-common species, L. evandroi, constituted only 5.0% of the total captures, and the remaining ten species only accounted for 7.0% of the total. Other species, such as L. evandroi, L. quinquefer, and L. migonei, were found in small numbers at sites near rural buildings occasionally. In forested sites, L. whitmani continued to be the dominant species, but here L. evandroi, L. tupynambai, and L. complexa were taken. Athough the sand fly fauna of the Amaraji region is diverse, with 12 species detected, it is nonetheless quite monospecific functionally. The 21 trap-nights in which sampling was unsuccessful represented 8.3% of the total set of trapping nights.

Seasonal patterns of occurrence contrasted between L. whitmani and the remaining species. L. whitmani was found in every sampling period, in the forest and near anthropogenic sites, with the greatest numbers being taken in March. However, the numbers of this species were also moderate to high in samples from June-October (i.e., >35 individuals in each monthly sample). In contrast, occurrences of the remaining species were highly concentrated in the period between February and April; only 41 individuals of any species other than L. whitmani were captured after April. The rarefaction-based comparisons of captures of L. whitmani and L. evandroi (the second-most-common species) indicated that L. whitmani is significantly less seasonal than L. evandroi. This period of concentrated occurrence from February to April coincided with the initiation of the yearly rainy season, although occurrences dropped off by May and June, which are the actual peak months of rain.

The spatial distribution of sand fly captures was also highly heterogeneous and variable (Figure 2). For example, L. whitmani occurred more frequently in the northeastern-most sites as well as in a few scattered localities of four other northern sites. However, none of the southwestern sites yielded specimens of this species and it was also absent in several other sites, including two sets close to the northeastern-most sites. L. evandroi was also taken frequently in the northeastern sites and was found at only one other site across the entire region. The remaining species showed a pattern similar to that of L. evandroi, being present in several northeastern sites and in only two other sites in the entire sample set.

image

Figure 2. Monthly trends in trap success (in terms of number of individuals for Lutzomyia whitmani, L. evandroi, and other species; also shown are percentage of trap-nights yielding no captures (“negatives”), and yearly trends in mean annual temperature and annual precipitation. Note that occurrences of L. whitmani in January, March, and May exceed the maximum visible in the chart, with 186, 716, and 152 individuals captured, respectively.

Download figure to PowerPoint

DISCUSSION

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED

Many Brazilian species of Lutzomyia have been associated with ACL transmission. In this study, we identified 12 species, some of which have been previously incriminated as competent leishmaniasis vectors. This diverse sand fly community is nonetheless dominated by the known vector species L. whitmani.

Our sampling at Amaraji shows that L. whitmani is the dominant presence throughout the year, particularly at sites near rural houses and other human facilities. Species diversity of sand flies was higher at forested sites than near human buildings, where L. whitmani was so dominant. L. whitmani has been perhaps the species most frequently connected to ACL transmission in the west-central, northern, and northeastern parts of Brazil. It has been captured in Brazil in many endemic ACL areas, in different vegetation and climate contexts (Costa et al. 2007, Zeilhofer et al. 2008, Souza et al. 2002, Peterson and Shaw 2003, Queiroz et al. 1994). More recently, several studies have indicated the increasing adaptation of L. whitmani to peridomiciliary sites: this trend would seem to be a positive response to human encroachment linked to deforestation (Costa et al. 2007, Campbell-Lendrum et al. 2000, Brandão-Filho et al. 2003, Souza et al. 2002, Teodoro et al. 1999). Another species, L. migonei, is also known to be involved in peridomiciliary ACL transmission in many regions of Brazil (Queiroz et al. 1994, Mayo et al. 1998, Azevedo and Rangel 1991), although it was uncommon in our samples.

L. evandroi and L. quinquefer have been captured near domestic animal shelters and peridomiciliary situations, but they have never been incriminated as vectors for human leishmaniasis. (Ximenes et al. 1999, Souza et al. 2002). Others species captured in the Amaraji region, such as L. fischeri, L. longispina, and L. sordellii (Souza et al. 2002, Luz et al. 2000, Mayo et al. 1998), have been encountered in peridomicilary habitats and forested environments in cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis endemic areas.

Simultaneous monthly sand fly captures in different ecological niches throughout the year enabled us to evaluate species diversity, seasonality, and abundances at different sites in different environments. As in other sand fly studies in the Brazilian cerrado and forested environments (Costa et al. 2007, Campbell-Lendrun et al. 2000, Luz et al. 2000), we found minimal seasonality of L. whitmani in Amaraji, although it was taken in greater numbers between March and June, when precipitation is increasing in the region. Increasing the frequency of sampling could result in clearer definition of peaks of abundance and better association with climatic events. Determining seasonal trends of sand fly populations is difficult since high variability characterizes nightly capture rates. L. whitmani was also seen to be most associated with peridomiciliary environments, emphasizing its potential vectorial importance to humans within these habitats. Curiously, in Mato Grosso do Sul, no marked seasonality was observed in this species, and it was present in larger numbers in forested habitats rather than in anthropogenic sites (Galati et al. 1996).

Seasonality was most evident in samples from forested sites, with captures of all species concentrated in March through May at the beginning of the rainy season. Besides L. whitmani, other common species included L. evandoi, L. tupynambai, and L. complexa. The latter species has been identified as an important vector associated with autochthonous ACL transmission in Para state, in the Amazon region, and other Atlantic Forest sites in Pernambuco (Souza et al. 1996, Andrade et al. 2005, Carvalho et al. 2007). Our results nonetheless reinforce the role of L. whitmani as the dominant vector of ACL transmission in this region, as even in samples at forested sites, it was the dominant species.

L. whitmani populations have been studied and characterized in terms of host and site preferences, dispersal, genetic variation, and natural infection rates (Campbell-Lendrum et al. 1999a,b). L. whitmani were significantly more attracted to humans than to dogs or chickens, showing very anthropophilic behavior. Experimental comparisons of anthropophily between geographically separated populations of this species have been developed (Campbell-Lendrum et al. 1999b, 2000). Comparing levels of anthropophily between sand fly species and populations of the same species from different geographical regions is complicated due to variations in their relative density. With these limitations in mind it would seem that the North-South and Amazonian mitochondrial lineages of L. whitmani are more anthropophilic than the North-Eastern lineage. Intraspecific comparisons among non-Amazonian sites suggest that L. whitmani is less anthropophilic than L. intermedia but more so than L. longipalpis (Brazil et al. 1991, Campbell-Lendrum et al. 1999a).

The combination of present and past studies on the biology of L. whitmani reinforce its status as the principal vector of ACL in peridomicillary and degraded forest habitats in the Atlantic rainforest zone of Pernambuco state. Such data sets will also enable us to make spatial associations of sand fly distributions with ACL cases, characterization of sand fly ecological niches, and forecasting of seasonal spatial activity patterns.

Acknowledgments

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED

This study was supported financially by grant from CNPq (410481/2006–8).

REFERENCES CITED

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED
  • Andrade, M.S., H.F. Valença, A.L. Silva, F.A. Almeida, E.L. Almeida, M.E.F. Brito, and S.P. Brandao-Filho. 2005. Sand fly fauna in a military training area endemic for American tegumentary leishmaniasis in the Atlantic Rain Forest region of Pernambuco, Brazil. Cad. Saúde Pública. 21: 17611767.
  • Azevedo, A.C.R. and E.F. Rangel. 1991. A study of sandfly species (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) in a focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the municipality of Baturité, Ceará, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 86: 405410.
  • Brandão-Filho, S.P., M.E.F. Brito, F.G. Carvalho, E. Ishikawa, E. Cupolilo, L.M. Floeter-Winter, and J.J. Shaw. 2003. Wild and synanthropic hosts of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in the endemic cutaneous leishmaniasis locality of Amaraji, Pernambuco State, Brazil. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 97: 291296.
  • Brandão-Filho, S.P., D. Campbell-Lendrum, M.E.F. Brito, J.J. Shaw, and C.R. Davies. 1999. Epidemiological surveys confirm an increasing burden of cutaneous leishmaniasis in North-East Brazil. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 93: 488494.
  • Brazil, R.P., I.E. Morton, and R.D. Ward. 1991. Notes of the feeding habitats of Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) whitmani (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Ceara State, Northeast Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 86: 497498.
  • Brito, M.E.F., M.S. Andrade, M.G. Mendonca, C.J. Silva, E.L. Almeida, B.S. Lima, S.M. Felix, F.G. Abath, G.C. da Graca, R. Porrozzi, E.A. Ishikawa, J.J. Shaw, E. Cupolillo, S.P. Brandao-Filho. 2009. Species diversity of Leishmania (Viannia) parasites circulating in an endemic area for cutaneous leishmaniasis located in the Atlantic rainforest region of northeastern Brazil. Trop. Med. Intl. Hlth. 14: 12781286.
  • Campbell-Lendrum, D., S.P. Brandão-Filho, M.C. Pinto, P.D. Ready, and C.R. Davies. 2000. Domesticity of Lutzomyia whitmani (Diptera: Psychodidae) populations: field experiments indicate behavioural differences. Bull. Entomol. Res. 90: 4148.
  • Campbell-Lendrum, D., S.P. Brandão-Filho, P.D. Ready, C.R. Davies. 1999a. Host and/or site loyalty of Lutzomyia whitmani (Diptera: Psychodidae). Med. Vet. Entomol. 13: 209211.
  • Campbell-Lendrum, D., J.P. Dujardin, E. Martinez, M.D. Feliciangeli, J.E. Perez, L.N.M. Passerat de Silans, and P. Desjeux. 2001. Domestic and peridomestic transmission of American cutaneous leishmaniasis: changing epidemiological patterns present new control opportunities. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 96: 159162.
  • Campbell-Lendrum, D., M.C. Pinto, S.P. Brandão-Filho, A. Souza, P.D. Ready, and C.R. Davies. 1999b. Experimental comparison of anthropophily between geographically dispersed populations of Lutzomyia whitmani (Diptera: Psychodidae). Med. Vet. Entomol. 13: 299309.
  • Carvalho, E.M., A. Barral, J.M. Costa, A. Bittencourt, and P. Marsden. 1994. Clinical and immunopathological aspects of disseminated cutaneous leishmaniasis. Acta Trop. 56: 315325.
  • Carvalho, M.R., B.S. Lima, J.F. Marinho Júnior, F.J. Silva, H.F. Valença, F.A. Almeida, A.L. Silva, and S.P. Brandão-Filho. 2007. Phlebotomine sandflies species from American visceral leishmaniasis in the North Rainforest region of Pernambuco State, Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública. 23: 12271232.
  • Costa, S.M., M. Cechinel, V. Bandeira, J.C. Zannuncio, R. Lainson, E.F. Rangel. 2007. Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) whitmani s.l. (Antunes & Coutinho, 1939) (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phebotominae): geographical dsitribution and the epidemiology of American Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil. Mini-review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 102: 149153.
  • Galati, E.A.B., V.L.B. Nunes, M.E.C. Dorval, E.T. Oshiro, G. Cristaldo, M.A. Espíndola, H.C. da Rocha, and W.B. Garcia. 1996. Estudo dos flebotomíneos (Diptera, Pychodidae), em área de leishmaniose tegumentar, no Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Rev. Saúde Pública. 30: 115128.
  • Grimaldi, G., Jr. and R.B. Tesh. 1993. Leishmaniases of the New World: current concepts and implications for future research. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 6: 230250.
  • Hijmans, R.J., S.E. Cameron, J.L. Parra, P.G. Jones, and A. Jarvis. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Intern. J. Clim. 25: 19651978.
  • Luz, E., N. Membrive, E.A. Castro, J. Dereure, F. Pratlong, J.A. Dedet, A. Pandey, and V. Thomaz-Soccol. 2000. Lutzomyia whitmani (Diptera: Psychodidae) as vector of Leishmania (V.) braziliensis in Parana state, southern Brazil. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 94: 623631.
  • Marcondes, C.B., L.G. Santos-Neto, and A.L. Lozovei. 2001. Ecology of Phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera, Psychodidae) in Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 34: 255260.
  • Mayo, R.C., C. Casanova, L.M. Mascarini, M.G. Pignatti, O. Rangel, and E.A.B. Galati. 1998. Flebotomíneos (Diptera, Psychodidae) de área de transmissão de leishmaniose tegumentar americana, no município de Itupeva, região Sudeste do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 31: 339345.
  • Peterson, A.T. and J. Shaw. 2003. Lutzomyia vectors for cutaneous leishmaniasis in Southern Brazil: ecological niche models, predicted geographic distributions, and climate change effects. Int. J. Parasitol. 33: 91931.
  • De Queiroz, R., I.A.B. Vasconcelos, A.W. Vasconcelos, F.A.C. Pessoa, R.N. Sousa, and J.R. David. 1994. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ceara State in northeastern Brazil: incrimination of Lutazomyia whitmani (Diptera: Psychodidae) as a vector of Leishmania braziliensis in Baturite municipality. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 50: 693698.
  • Rangel, E.F. and R. Lainson. 2009. Proven and putative vectors of American cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil: aspects of their biology and vectorial competence. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 104: 937954.
  • Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Ministerio da Saude, Brasil. 2010. Bol. Epidemiol. Eletrônico 10: 224.
  • Shaw, J.J. 2002. New World leishmaniasis: the ecology of leishmaniasis and the diversity of leishmanial species in Central and South America. In: Leishmania: World Class Parasites, Vol IV., S.J.Black and J.R.Seed (eds.) Kluwer Academic Publishers, U.S.A. 193 pp.
  • Souza, A., E. Ishikawa, R. Braga, F. Silveira, R. Lainson, and J.J. Shaw. 1996. Psychodopygus complexus, a new vector of Leishmania braziliensis to humans in Pará State, Brazil. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 90: 112113.
  • Souza, N.A., C.A. Andrade-Coelho, M.L. Vilela, A.V. Peixoto, and E.F. Rangel. 2002. Seasonality of Lutzomyia intermedia and Lutzomyia whitmani (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae), occurring sympatrically in area of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 97: 759765.
  • Teodoro, U., J.B. Kühl, D.R. Santos, and E.S. Santos. 1999. Impacto de alterações ambientais na ecologia de flebotomíneos no sul do Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública. 15: 901906.
  • Ximenes, M.F.F.M., M.F. Souza, and E.G. Castellon. 1999. Density of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in domestic and wild animal shelters in an area of visceral leishmaniasis in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 94: 427432.
  • Zeilhofer, P., O.P. Kummer, E.S. Santos, A.L. Ribeiro, and N.A. Missawa. 2008. Spatial modelling of Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) whitmani s.l. (Antunes & Coutinho, 1939) (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) habitat suitability in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 103: 653660.