SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Multi-annual cycles;
  • density-dependence;
  • epidemiology;
  • hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome;
  • Arvicolinae

ABSTRACT:

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED

The transmission of pathogens to susceptible hosts is dependent on the vector population dynamics. In Europe, bank voles (Myodes glareolus) carry Puumala hantavirus, which causes nephropathia epidemica (NE) in humans. Fluctuations in bank vole populations and epidemics in humans are correlated but the main factors influencing this relationship remain unclear. In Belgium, more NE cases are reported in spring than in autumn. There is also a higher incidence of human infections during years of large vole populations. This study aimed to better understand the link between virus prevalence in the vector, vole demography, habitat quality, and human infections. Three rodent populations in different habitats bordering Brussels city, Belgium, were studied for two years. The seroprevalence in voles was influenced first by season (higher in spring), then by vole density, vole weight (a proxy for age), and capture site but not by year or sex. Moreover, voles with large maximal distance between two captures had a high probability for Puumala seropositivity. Additionally, the local vole density showed similar temporal variations as the number of NE cases in Belgium. These results showed that, while season was the main factor influencing vole seroprevalence, it was not sufficient to explain human risks. Indeed, vole density and weight, as well as the local habitat, were essential to understanding the interactions in these host-pathogen dynamics. This can, in turn, be of importance for assessing the human risks.


INTRODUCTION

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED

Hantaviruses (family Bunyaviridae) are emerging rodent-borne pathogens that circulate worldwide. They are mainly carried by rodents (Muridae and Cricetidae) and by insectivores (Arai et al. 2007). Remarkably, each hantavirus is associated with a few distinct rodent species (Plyusnin et al. 1996). The transmission of hantavirus to non-host rodents is nevertheless documented (Klingström et al. 2002), but host specificity merits further investigation, especially among wild sympatric rodents (e.g., Plyusnina et al. 2011).

Some reservoir and/or vector rodents represent very interesting systems to study because they show multi-annual population cycles which have a complex impact on the quantity of circulating pathogens (Davis et al. 2005, Sauvage et al. 2003). Such population fluctuations are believed to be induced by several factors: climate, weather, food, probably predators, but also infectious agents (Cavanagh et al. 2004, Oli 2003, Stenseth et al. 2003). The effect of hantavirus on such demographic fluctuations is perhaps limited, as few detrimental effects were described in the vector species. In the natural reservoirs, hantaviruses establish a life-long, chronic infection, and the host develops a strong neutralizing antibody response against the virus (Chu et al. 1994).

However, in humans, hantaviruses are the etiologic agents of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) in Europe and Asia, and of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) in the Americas (Peters and Khan 2002). At least 15 of the 35 described hantavirus serotypes are human pathogens (five of them cause HFRS). Worldwide, about 150,000 cases of hantavirus infection are reported annually, mainly in Asia (Vapalahti et al. 2003). Humans are infected by inhalation of aerosols contaminated with excreta from infected rodents. HFRS symptoms include fever, abdominal and back pain as well as renal dysfunction, sometimes with hemorrhagic manifestations (Vapalahti et al. 2003).

In most of Europe, Puumala hantavirus (PUUV), carried by bank voles, Myodes (earlier, Clethrionomys) glareolus, causes a milder form of HFRS known as nephropathia epidemica (NE). This disease is rarely lethal (less than 0.5% of the cases) but may require an average hospital stay of eight days (Paakkala et al. 2004). NE shows multi-annual epidemics in the human population, which are linked to fluctuations in bank vole population density (Schwarz et al. 2009, Tersago et al. 2011, Vapalahti et al. 2003). Until recently, such PUUV epidemics in western Europe showed multi-annual cycles with peaks every three years (Heyman et al. 2001, Sauvage et al. 2003). Since 2001, the peak frequency changed to every two years (Heyman et al. 2007). This change is associated with an increasing morbidity of PUUV infection in humans with some unexpected sudden rises (Faber et al. 2011).

Season has also an impact on the relationship between vole presence and the number of NE cases. In northern Europe, more infections are recorded in autumn and winter (Olsson et al. 2003), while in Belgium, spring is the peak season (Vapalahti et al. 2003). In Belgium, the NE seasonality could be partly due to an increase in human outdoor activities during springtime, but the vole population fluctuations could also play an important role. Indeed, bank voles overwinter in mixed-sex groups before dispersing in spring as old individuals (Ylönen and Viitala 1991). Within these groups, the virus is very efficiently transmitted by social interactions (biting and grooming, Escutenaire et al. 2002) but also indirectly by inhalation of virions excreted in infectious saliva, urine, or feces. Indeed, under adequate conditions, PUUV can survive for up to two weeks outside their host (Kallio et al. 2006). Therefore, the old bank voles dispersing in spring probably show a high seroprevalence (Escutenaire et al. 2000) and could be critical in the dynamics of PUUV infections in humans.

A second important within-population factor is the different infection probability in female, male and juvenile bank voles. During the reproductive season, adult females are territorial and aggressive but seem to show a lower seroprevalence than males (Escutenaire et al. 2002), which have large home ranges that partially cover several female territories (Bujalska and Grüm 1989). The maternal antibodies protect the juveniles from PUUV infection for up to 80 days. Therefore, during the reproductive season, males should probably show a higher seroprevalence than females, while juveniles should have a very low PUUV infection rate. This can have significant effects on the dynamics of the infection (Kallio et al. 2006).

Most PUUV studies were carried out on remote rodent populations (Kallio et al. 2007, Sauvage et al. 2002, Tersago et al. 2008, 2011). This paper reports the monitoring of PUUV seroprevalence in suburban populations, which are probably limited in emigration by a highly fragmented and disturbed habitat. The populations were located at close range of heavy human presence, namely the city of Brussels (1.2 × 106 inhabitants). Temporal and spatial dynamics of rodent and virus populations were analyzed to improve the understanding of their impact on human infection risk. For that purpose, factors that could influence PUUV seroprevalence in voles were analyzed: year, season, capture site, vole density, vole age (estimated from weight), vole sex, and vole home range size. Two main assumptions were tested. Since, in Belgium, more human infections are observed in spring than in autumn, it was first checked whether the higher proportion of older voles found in spring would be linked to a higher seroprevalence in spring than in autumn. As the way by which habitat quality influences the virus presence in natural populations is poorly known (Heyman et al. 2009), the effect of weight and home range size on seroprevalence was tested. In addition, the relation between vole PUUV seroprevalence and the number of NE cases in Belgium was examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED

Sampling and diagnostics

Three sites were sampled in the Sonian Forest along the southern border of Brussels. This forest presents many footpaths for recreational use. Sites 1 and 2 were separated by 500 m and a dense traffic four-lane road (50°49′N, 4°27′E). Site 1 was located 200 m from private gardens and was frequently visited by walkers. Site 2 was surrounded by areas with no vegetation cover on the ground and thus not favorable to rodents. Site 3 was located 6 km southwest from site 1 in a more remote area with fewer and distant paths. It was not visited by people. On all sites, the dominant trees were Fagus sylvatica. In site 1, the ground vegetation was in order of abundance: Luzula sylvatica, Rubus fruticosus, Juncus effuses, Deschampsia cespitosa, Senecio ovatus, Carex pilulifera, Deschampsia flexuosa, and Veronica montana. Site 2 presented Hyacinthoides non-scripta, Anemone nemorosa, Convallaria majalis, Lonicera periclymenum, and Pteridium aquilinum. At site 3, about 10% of Quercus robur was observed with the ground covered by Rubus fruticosus.

For two years, each site was sampled in autumn and spring for two weeks. The trapping sessions began in September, 2003, May, 2004, September, 2004 and May, 2005. Each time a zone of 0.70 ha was sampled with a 10 × 6 grid live-traps (one trap every 12.5 m: Ugglan 2, Grahnab, Hillerstorp, Sweden). The bait consisted of a slice of apple and peanut butter. Hydrophobic cotton wool was also added to the traps to provide shelter from the cold and humidity.

The traps were checked every morning for four days, then remained opened for three days and finally were checked again once a day for four days. This was due to increased human presence during weekends on the sites, exposing traps to theft or destruction. Captured bank voles and wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) were sexed and weighed (to the nearest 0.1 g). To be considered as adults, males needed testes in scrotum while females needed perforated vagina, vaginal plug, or distended abdomen linked to pregnancy. All rodents outside these criteria were considered as juveniles. For adult voles (N = 446) and adult mice (from site 2 only, N = 36) captured for the first time in a given 11-day session, a 2 μl blood sample was also taken with a micropipette after puncture of the saphenous vein. The presence of hantavirus IgG was tested with Ab-Dect Puumala rapid field test (Reagena, Toivala, Finland). Animals were individually marked with a numbered ear-tag (model 1005-1, National Band and Tag Co, Newport, KY) and subsequently released at the place of capture. This procedure was approved by the Nature Conservation Board of the Brussels Region.

Data analysis and statistics

For each vole captured in more than one trap in a given season, the maximal distance between the two most distant captures was calculated (as a straight line between two traps). This was corrected for body weight (by dividing by weight) and defined as index 1. For the animals captured in at least three traps in one capture season, their home range was estimated by the minimum convex polygon method (average number of captures = 4.25). For these animals, the maximal distance corrected for weight (index 1) and home range corrected for weight (defined as index 2) were also used. The seroprevalence was calculated for the tested voles only (which are probably the most active individuals with the highest infection probability) and for the whole population including the juveniles (which can be protected from hantavirus infection by maternal antibodies). The first method avoids the influence of the juveniles' abundance on the seroprevalence calculation. Data of human hantavirus infections in Belgium for the years corresponding to the rodent survey years were obtained from the Scientific Institute of Public Health through the national reference laboratory and the sentinel laboratory network.

Next to confidence intervals and hypothesis tests for basic parameters, more elaborate and appropriate statistical models were constructed in order to investigate (1) which factors were statistically related to the probability for an individual rodent in the population to be positive and (2) which factors had a significant effect on the mean weight of voles in the population. More precisely, optimal univariate and multiple logistic regression models were fitted to investigate which of the factors of site, season, year, sex, adult vole density, or weight had a significant effect on the infection status. For part of the data, the maximal distance between two captures, the maximal area between at least three captures (i.e., home range), index 1, and index 2 were also available and were related to the infection status. The most complicated multiple logistic regression model, including all main effects and all interactions, was gradually reduced to the optimal submodel using a backward stepwise procedure. In a similar way, another multiple linear regression model was built to examine how the mean of the (continuous) response log(weight) (log transform was needed to satisfy normality assumptions) depended on all other above-mentioned factors as well as on the infection status.

RESULTS

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED

Populations and seroprevalence

The captured species were bank voles (N = 665, 75%) and wood mice (N = 220, 19%) but also included shrews (Crocidura russula and C. leucodon, N = 31, 5%) and dormice (Eliomys quercinus, N = 2, 1%). Voles were captured during each of the four sessions (182 individuals in autumn, 2003; 89 in spring, 2004; 108 in autumn, 2004; and 286 in spring, 2005). No mice were captured in autumn, 2004 (53, 24, 0, and 143 individuals during the four sessions). The proportion of juvenile voles did not differ between spring and autumn (spring: 32.5%, autumn: 37.4%, chi-square, N = 665, P = 0.43).

Univariate logistic regression analyses (with overdisperion accounting for unobserved heterogeneity) revealed that the seroprevalence is mainly influenced by the season. A higher seroprevalence was observed in the spring than in the autumn (Table 1). Also, the vole density appeared to be an important factor with higher seroprevalence in high densities (see Figure 1) and seroprevalence increased with weight (a proxy for age), as to be expected. Finally, the univariate logistic analyses indicated that the capture site showed a borderline significant effect on the prevalence (p = 0.0572 between sites 1 and 2). Year and sex did not show significant effects.

Table 1.  Hantavirus seroprevalence (%) for vole weight classes in spring and autumn. The numbers of weighed bank voles are indicated in brackets. No weight or seroprevalence difference was detected between tested males and females. Seroprevalence (and weight) were higher in spring than in autumn. On the whole, positive voles were heavier than negative ones.
 SpringAutumn 
Weight classMalesFemalesMalesFemalesTotal
12.6- -16.557.1 (7)33.3 (12)0.0 (18)7.7 (13)26.0 (50)
16.6- -20.534.9 (43)44.1 (34)4.5 (44)9.1 (33)33.1 (154)
20.6- -24.042.2 (45)32.1 (28)0.0 (17)11.1 (18)31.5 (108)
24.1- -33.028.8 (52)42.9 (35)30.0 (10)10.0 (10)32.7 (107)
Total36.1 (147)39.4 (109)5.6 (89)7.7 (74)25.8 (419)
image

Figure 1. Plot of seroprevalence data overlaid with fitted curve based on univariate logistic regression model with a linear effect of weight (linear on the logit scale, nonlinear on the prevalence scale). The symbols have size proportional to the number of observations for that particular combination of site and session (larger symbols have more impact on the model fit). One of the observations for site 3 in spring is barely visible (in the lower left corner) because it is based on one vole only.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The univariate logistic regression models were extended to a multiple regression model, allowing the study of possible interaction effects. A stepwise model building procedure led to a final optimal model which improved the fit of all univariate models substantially. The final model included main effects site and season as well as an interaction effect of site and season. The interaction effect was highly significant (p-value 0.0017 for the interaction term season × site 2 and 0.0276 for the interaction term season × site 3, site 1 served as reference), and consequently the main effects of site and season have no longer any direct interpretation, moreover, they were not significant. The significant interaction effect can be interpreted as follows: the odds for PUUV infection always increase in spring as compared to autumn, but this increase differs from site to site: the effect of the season is large for site 2, followed by site 3 and the smallest for site 1. A separate multiple logistic regression analysis was performed for those data for which index values were available. Again, there were higher odds for Puumala virus infection in spring (independently of site) and the odds also increased with index 1 (maximal distance between two captures, corrected for body weight).

Finally, for wood mice, hantavirus status was only tested in site 2 in autumn, 2003 and spring, 2005. In autumn, 2003, no positive wood mice were detected (N = 15), while adult voles similarly showed a very low seroprevalence (5%, N = 20). In spring, 2005, however, male and female wood mice were seropositive for hantavirus. They showed a similar seroprevalence (62%, N = 21) compared to the voles (58%, N = 66), which was the highest one observed. A logistic regression on these four observations showed that seroprevalence is influenced by season (Estimate = 2.865, se = 0.903, P = 0.0015) but not by species (Estimate =–0.869, se = 1.719, P = 0.613).

Temporal and spatial analysis

The optimal multiple regression model (using stepwise model building) for the continuous outcome log(weight) included significant interaction effects season × site 2 (p = 0.0456) and season × year (p < 0.0001). The interaction effect season × site 3 was not significant (p = 0.2846) and site 1 served again as reference. As recommended in the statistical literature, all main effects of season, site and year were retained in the model, although the year main effect was not significant. Again, as interaction effects are present, main effects have no direct interpretation. Overall, mean weight (on log scale) was significantly higher in spring, but this seasonal effect differed from site to site (smallest for site 1 and largest for site 2), and differed with the years (smaller for autumn, 2004 and spring, 2005).

Secondly, 23 voles (and one wood mouse) were recaptured between two successive sessions, of which fourteen were tested in both sessions (being already adults in the first session). Twelve of them were negative during the first test and the two last ones were positive but did not show detectable levels of IgG during the second test a few months later. All the voles recaptured during two seasons were negative either for the first test or for the second test. On the whole, six (43%) of these 14 voles seroconverted between the two sessions; they all did so during winter. In addition, the adult vole densities show strikingly similar average temporal variations for the three sites and excluding juveniles, compared to the monthly average number of human infections recorded in Belgium (Figure 2). If the vole juveniles are included, the temporal variations still show similar results.

image

Figure 2. Comparison of the monthly number of human hantavirus infections in Belgium (diamonds) and adult vole density from this study (excluding juveniles, squares). The changes in vole density are indicated by a dashed line. These changes are similar for the number of human infections between the same dates. The human data come from the Scientific Institute of Public Health. They were gathered by the sentinel laboratory network (http://www.iph.fgov.be/epidemio/labo) and the reference laboratory.

Download figure to PowerPoint

DISCUSSION

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED

This two-year study showed that bank voles were common at all three suburban sites studied and that hantavirus was detected in voles at least at one site during each of the four capture seasons. Vole density and hantavirus seroprevalence showed large fluctuations. Changes in vole demography were synchronous with those observed in wood mice. This result is consistent with both species experiencing the same environmental constraints as food limitation or predation risks.

This work determined four factors that had a significant impact on the seroprevalence of the studied vole populations. The main factor influencing the prevalence was the season, with spring being a period with higher seroprevalence than autumn. This is probably linked to the presence of old overwintering voles in spring. Indeed, tested voles were heavier (consequently older, as weight seems a good proxy for age) in spring than in autumn. There are two non-exclusive explanations to this observation. Firstly, the winter weather can increase survival of the virus outside the host, which would thus raise indirect transmission from the environment, as already observed in cold winters in Belgium (Linard et al. 2007). Secondly, voles living inside mixed wintering groups have a higher probability of encountering an infected vole (Escutenaire et al. 2002). The population structure in spring is thus a cohort of animals with a high likelihood of infection. The low seroprevalence in autumn could have been due to the summer reproduction leading to a large cohort of young animals with low seroprevalence due to maternal immunity. However, the observed proportion of juveniles was not different between both seasons (spring: 32.5%, autumn: 37).

The second significant factor for seroprevalence was vole density, as previously thought (Heroldová et al. 2010, Heyman et al. 2001). This is linked to the increased probability of rodent direct encounters and the larger presence of the virus in the environment at high density.

The third factor showing a significant influence on seroprevalence was vole weight. As seen in other hantavirus hosts, heavier (thus probably older) rodents have a higher probability to be hantavirus positive, given their longer period to have been in contact with the virus (Escutenaire et al. 2002, Heroldová et al. 2010). Weight is, in turn, dependent on season, logically with bigger (older) animals in spring, but a deeper analysis showed that this seasonal variation in weight was dependent on site and on year: in the suboptimal site 2, weight differences were larger between spring and autumn while the difference was smaller in site 1. It must be noted that pregnant females are included in this body weight analysis. They are thus considered as “old” individuals, which is consistent with their reproductive state.

The fourth factor that influenced the seroprevalence was the capture site. The two sites that were very close to each other showed different seroprevalence dynamics, and ecologic differences between the sites probably constitute a good explanation, as already observed (Escutenaire et al. 2002, Olsson et al. 2005). Site 2 was a fragmented sub-optimal habitat, surrounded by a low quality environment for rodents with no vegetation cover and large roads, unlike the two other sites surrounded by forest. It is also possible that the relative dryness of site 2 induced a low survival of hantavirus (Kallio et al. 2006).

The discrepancy among the sites was further confirmed with a differential impact of season on the seroprevalence in the three sites. Season's effect was important for the suboptimal site 2, average for the undisturbed remote forest (site 3), and small for the travelled forest (site 1). Environmental factors are known to have an impact on seroprevalence (Escutenaire et al. 2002, Heyman et al. 2009). Interestingly, the effect of the site on seasonal weight shows a similar structure to that of the seroprevalence described above (site 2 > site 3 > site 1).

The four significant factors for vole seroprevalence (season, vole density, vole weight, and site) probably influence the human infection dynamics. Firstly, season is indeed important for human risk. In spring, old rodents are looking for new resources to maximize their reproduction (Gliwicz 1990), i.e., they migrate or, at least, enlarge their home range. Breeding voles also increase their antagonistic behavior, which is linked to hantavirus transmission, and, at least in males, the marking of their home range (Escutenaire et al. 2002). These behaviors probably expand the areas potentially contaminated by the virus and are consistent with higher numbers of human infections in spring or summer, periods with increased outdoor activities in humans (Mustonen et al. 1998). Secondly, vole density is also important for human infection risk. Indeed, the present study shows a similar profile between the average vole densities observed and the number of recorded human infections in Belgium (Figure 2). No NE case was reported in close vicinity of the studied areas (but site 3 was not close to settlements). Hence, it was not possible to directly link the observations of this study with a medical analysis. In Sweden, vole density is the main factor promoting NE cases (Palo 2009) and is linked to high seed production (mast year, Tersago et al. 2009). Other predictive factors could be temperature and precipitation (Haredasht et al. 2011).

In the present study, no differences in seroprevalence between males and females were detected. The juveniles were excluded from the analysis. It is not clear at what point sex is important in regard to PUUV infection as it can have a strong influence (Deter et al. 2008) or none (Escutenaire et al. 2000). An explanation for the absence of sexual difference would be that wounds, which affect PUUV infection (Escutenaire et al. 2002), would be in excess at high density in sexually active territorial females. Usually, male bank voles have home ranges larger than those of females (Bujalska and Grüm 1989). As home range size is indirectly related to the probability of being infected by hantavirus, males are typically considered to be more at risk of being PUUV positive (Deter et al. 2008). This study showed that voles with a larger distance between their two most distant captures showed higher probabilities of being PUUV seropositive.

It was also shown that, at least at high hantavirus seroprevalence in voles, wood mice can show peaks of hantavirus seroprevalence. Previous work reported very low PUUV seroprevalence in wood mice (Klingström et al. 2002) while the current study recorded a high seroprevalence in wood mice and voles (about 60%). As wood mice normally do not carry hantavirus, the serotype detected is possibly PUUV, given the common occurrence of this serotype when wood mice are infected. This suggests that PUUV can spill over in wood mice, at least at high bank vole seroprevalence. Such spill-overs are important for hantavirus evolution in new hosts (Schlegel et al. 2009). Further data are necessary to assess whether this presence of sympatric non-reservoir host species could influence the virus dynamics and the human contamination risks through a dilution effect (as in other diseases, e.g., LoGiudice et al. 2003).

In conclusion, this study followed the temporal and spatial dynamics of small rodent populations infected by PUUV at close ranges of human presence. It showed that season, population density, vole weight, and site features were the key factors influencing seroprevalence. None of these factors alone was sufficient to explain the seroprevalence variations, demonstrating the complexity of the interactions. Furthermore, this work showed that the local vole density followed a similar profile as the numbers of NE cases in humans, which are partly influenced by season but probably also by local site variations. Vole sex had no significant influence on the system studied, while home range size mattered. These results shed some light on a rarely studied type of rodent population and on the factors useful for human risk evaluation.

Acknowledgments

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED

We are grateful to the members of the Unit of Social Ecology in the Université Libre de Bruxelles for their support. Thanks are also due to the field assistants for their help in capturing rodents. We would like to thank Dr. S. Godefroid for her help with the botanical information. We are grateful to Sara Van der Heyden for her suggestions. We also thank two anonymous referees for their important remarks. This research was supported by the Institute for the encouragement of Scientific Research and Innovation of Brussels (ISRIB) and the Veterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre (VAR).

REFERENCES CITED

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT:
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. REFERENCES CITED
  • Arai, S., J.W. Song, L. Sumibcay, S.N. Bennett, V.R. Nerurkar, C. Parmenter, J.A. Cook, T.L. Yates, and R. Yanagihara. 2007. Hantavirus in northern short-tailed shrew, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13: 14201422.
  • Bujalska, G. and L. Grüm 1989. Social organization of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus, Schreber 1780) and its demographic consequences: a model. Oecologia 80: 7081.
  • Cavanagh, R., X. Lambin, T. Ergon, M. Bennett, I.M. Graham, D. van Soolingen, and M. Begon. 2004. Disease dynamics in cyclic populations of field voles (Microtus agrestis): cowpox virus and vole tuberculosis (Mycobacterium microti). Proc. Roy. Soc. London B. 271: 859867.
  • Chu, Y.K., C. Rossi, J.W. LeDuc, H.W. Lee, C.S. Schmaljohn, and J.M. Dalrymple. 1994. Serological relationships among viruses in the hantavirus genus, family Bunyaviridae. Virology 198: 196204.
  • Davis, S., E. Calvet, and H. Leirs. 2005. Fluctuating rodent populations and risk to humans from rodent-borne zoonoses. Vector-borne Zoonot. Dis. 5: 305314.
  • Deter, J., Y. Chaval, M. Galan, B. Gauffre, S. Morand, H. Henttonen, J. Laakkonen, L. Voutilainen, N. Charbonnel, and J. F. Cosson. 2008. Kinship, dispersal and hantavirus transmission in bank and common voles. Arch. Virol. 153: 435444.
  • Escutenaire, S., P. Chalon, R. Verhagen, P. Heyman, I. Thomas, L. Karelle-Bui, T. Avsic-Zupanc, Å. Lundkvist, A. Plyusnin, and P.P. Pastoret. 2000. Spatial and temporal dynamics of Puumala hantavirus infection in red bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) populations in Belgium. Virus Res. 67: 91107.
  • Escutenaire, S., P. Chalon, F. De Jaegere, L. Karelle-Bui, G. Mees, B. Brochier, F. Rozenfeld, and P. P. Pastoret. 2002. Behavioral, physiologic, and habitat influences on the dynamics of Puumala virus infection in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8: 930936.
  • Faber, M.S., R.G. Ulrich, C. Frank, S.O. Brockmann, G.M. Pfaff, J. Jacob, D.H. Krüger, and K. Stark. 2011. Steep rise in notified hantavirus infections in Germany, April 2010. Euro. Surveill. 15: pii=19574.
  • Gliwicz, J. 1990. Habitat-dependent reproductive success in bank voles. In: R.H. Tamarin, R.S. Ostfeld, S.R. Pugh, and G. Bujalska (eds.) Social System and Population Cycles in Voles. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel , pp. 169179.
  • Haredasht, S.A., J.M. Barrios, P. Maes, W.W. Verstraeten, J. Clement, G. Ducoffre, K. Lagrou, M. Van Ranst, P. Coppin, D. Berckmans, and J.M. Aerts. 2011. A dynamic data-based model describing nephropathia epidemica in Belgium. Biosyst. Engin. 109: 7789.
  • Heroldová, M., M. Pejčoch, J. Bryja, E. Jánová, J. Suchomel, and E. Tkadlec. 2010. Tula virus in populations of small terrestrial mammals in a rural landscape. Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 10: 599603.
  • Heyman, P., T. Vervoort, S. Escutenaire, E. Degrave, J. Konings, C. Vandenvelde, and R. Verhagen. 2001. Incidence of hantavirus infections in Belgium. Virus Res. 77: 7180.
  • Heyman, P., C. Cochez, G. Ducoffre, A. Mailles, H. Zeller, M. Abu Sin, J. Koch, G. van Doornum, M. Koopmans, J. Mossong, and F. Schneider. 2007. Haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: An analysis of the outbreaks in Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Luxembourg in 2005. Euro. Surveill. 12: pii=712.
  • Heyman, P., R. Van Mele, L. Smajlovic, A. Dobly, C. Cochez, and C. Vandenvelde. 2009. Association between habitat and prevalence of hantavirus infections in bank voles (Myodes glareolus) and Wood Mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 9: 141146.
  • Kallio, E.R., J. Klingström, E. Gustafsson, T. Manni, A. Vaheri, H. Henttonen, O. Vapalahti, and Å. Lundkvist. 2006. Prolonged survival of Puumala hantavirus outside the host: evidence for indirect transmission via the environment. J. Gen. Virol. 87: 21272134.
  • Kallio, E.R., L. Voutilainen, O. Vapalahti, A. Vaheri, H. Henttonen, E. Koskela, and T. Mappes. 2007. Endemic hantavirus infection impairs the winter survival of its rodent host. Ecology 88: 19111916.
  • Klingström, J., P. Heyman, S. Escutenaire, K. Brus Sjölander, F. De Jaegere, H. Henttonen, and Å Lundkvist. 2002. Rodent host specificity of European hantaviruses: evidence of Puumala virus interspecific spillover. J. Med. Virol. 68: 581588.
  • Lambin, X., D.A. Elston, S.J. Petty, and J.L. MacKinnon. 1998. Spatial asynchrony and periodic travelling waves in cyclic populations of field voles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 265: 14911496.
  • Linard, C., K. Tersago, H. Leirs, and E. Lambin. 2007. Environmental conditions and Puumala virus transmission in Belgium. Int. J. Hlth. Geog. 6: 55.
  • LoGiudice, K., R.S. Ostfeld, K.A. Schmidt, and F. Keesing. 2003. The ecology of infectious disease: Effects of host diversity and community composition on Lyme disease risk. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 567571.
  • Mustonen, J., O. Vapalahti, H. Henttonen, A. Pasternack, and A. Vaheri. 1998. Epidemiology of hantavirus infections in Europe. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 13: 27292731.
  • Oli, M.K. 2003. Population cycles of small rodents are caused by specialist predators: Or are they? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 105107.
  • Olsson, G.E., F. Dalerum, B. Hörnfeldt, F. Elgh, T.R. Palo, P. Juto, and C. Ahlm. 2003. Human hantavirus infections, Sweden. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9: 13951401.
  • Olsson, G.E., N. White, J. Hjältén, and C. Ahlm. 2005. Habitat factors associated with bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) and concomitant hantavirus in northern Sweden. Vector-borne Zoonot. Dis. 5: 315323.
  • Paakkala, A., L. Lempinen, T. Paakkala, H. Huhtala, and J. Mustonen. 2004. Medical imaging in nephropathia epidemica and their clinical correlations. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 15: 284290.
  • Palo, R.T. 2009. Time series analysis performed on Nephropathia epidemica in humans of northern Sweden in relation to bank vole population dynamic and the NAO index. Zoonoses Publ. Hlth. 56: 150156 doi: 10.1111j.1863-2378.2008.01162.x.
  • Peters, C.J. and A.S. Khan. 2002. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome: the new American hemorrhagic fever. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34: 12241231.
  • Plyusnin, A., O. Vapalahti, and A. Vaheri 1996. Hantaviruses: genome structure, expression and evolution. J. Gen. Virol. 77: 26772687.
  • Plyusnina, A., L.C. Krajinović, J. Margaletić, J. Niemimaa, K. Nemirov, Å. Lundkvist, A. Markotić, M. Miletić-Medved, T. Avšič-Županc, H. Henttonen, and A. Plyusnin 2011. Genetic evidence for the presence of two distinct hantaviruses associated with Apodemus mice in Croatia and analysis of local strains. J. Med. Virol. 83: 108114.
  • Sauvage, F., C. Penalba, P. Vuillaume, F. Boue, D. Coudrier, D. Pontier, and M. Artois. 2002. Puumala hantavirus infection in humans and in the reservoir host, Ardennes region, France. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8: 15091511.
  • Sauvage, F., M. Langlais, N.G. Yoccoz, and D. Pontier. 2003. Modelling hantavirus in fluctuating populations of bank voles: the role of indirect transmission on virus persistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 113.
  • Schlegel, M., B. Klempa, B. Auste, M. Bemmann, J. Schmidt-Chanasit, T. Büchner, M.H. Groschup, M. Meier, A. Balkema-Buschmann, H. Zoller, D.H. Krüger, and R.G. Ulrich. 2009. Dobrava-Belgrade Virus spillover infections, Germany. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15: 20172020.
  • Schwarz, A.C., U. Ranft, I. Piechotowski, J.E. Childs, and S.O. Brockmann. 2009. Risk factors for human infection with Puumala virus, Southwestern Germany. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15: 10321039.
  • Stenseth, N.C., H. Viljugrein, T. Saitoh, T.F. Hansen, M.O. Kittilsen, E. Bølviken, and F. Glockner. 2003. Seasonality, density dependence, and population cycles in Hokkaido voles. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 100: 1147811483.
  • Tersago, K., A. Schreurs, C. Linard, R. Verhagen, S. Van Dongen, and H. Leirs 2008. Population, environmental, and community effects on local bank vole (Myodes glareolus) Puumala virus infection in an area with low human incidence. Vector-Borne Zoonot. Dis. 8: 235244.
  • Tersago, K., R. Verhagen, and H. Leirs. 2009. Hantavirus disease (nephropathia epidemica) in Belgium: effects of tree seed production and climate. Epidemiol. Infect. 137: 250256.
  • Tersago, K., R. Verhagen, O. Vapalahti, P. Heyman, G. Ducoffre, and H. Leirs 2011. Hantavirus outbreak in Western Europe: reservoir host infection dynamics related to human disease patterns. Epidemiol. Infect. 139: 381390.
  • Vapalahti, O., J. Mustonen, Å. Lundkvist, H. Henttonen, A. Plyusnin, and A. Vaheri. 2003. Hantavirus infections in Europe. Lancet Infect. Dis. 3: 653661.
  • Ylönen, H. and J. Viitala. 1991. Social overwintering and food distribution in the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus. Holarctic Ecol. 14: 131137.