The author expresses appreciation to the Shorenstein Asia–Pacific Research Center (APARC) Fourth Annual Koret Conference held on 2 March 2012 in Stanford, CA. This paper benefited from insightful feedback from the APARC conference participants, from colleagues at faculty research seminars at Ewha and Seoul National Universities, and from the anonymous reviewers. The author thanks In-young Park for excellent research assistance.
Middle Power National Identity? South Korea and Vietnam in US–China Geopolitics†
Article first published online: 6 DEC 2012
© 2012 Center for International Studies, Inha University
Volume 27, Issue 3, pages 421–442, December 2012
How to Cite
Easley, L.-E. (2012), Middle Power National Identity? South Korea and Vietnam in US–China Geopolitics. Pacific Focus, 27: 421–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1976-5118.2012.01090.x
- Issue published online: 6 DEC 2012
- Article first published online: 6 DEC 2012
- middle power;
- national identity;
- foreign policy;
- international relations;
- East Asia
The middle powers literature often conflates role identity (national self-conception) of middle power states with role performance (foreign policies), while neglecting East Asia as a region of hypothesis generation and testing. Empirical studies of middle powers tend to consider European cases, Canada, Australia and South Africa, while research on contemporary East Asia international relations focuses on great powers or the development of regional institutions. This article contributes to the middle powers literature by comparing the post-Cold-War national identities and foreign policies of South Korea and Vietnam. A framework for analyzing national identity is applied to major sources of national self-conceptions in Seoul and Hanoi. The article examines how identity trajectories relate to change in South Korea and Vietnam's geopolitical positioning between the United States and China, and assesses the prospects for middle power cooperation in East Asia.