Correspondence site: http://www.respond2articles.com/MEE/
Distance sampling and the challenge of monitoring butterfly populations
Version of Record online: 28 MAR 2011
© 2011 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2011 British Ecological Society
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Volume 2, Issue 6, pages 585–594, December 2011
How to Cite
Isaac, N. J. B., Cruickshanks, K. L., Weddle, A. M., Marcus Rowcliffe, J., Brereton, T. M., Dennis, R. L. H., Shuker, D. M. and Thomas, C. D. (2011), Distance sampling and the challenge of monitoring butterfly populations. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2: 585–594. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00109.x
- Issue online: 5 DEC 2011
- Version of Record online: 28 MAR 2011
- Received 8 March 2010; accepted 28 February 2011 Handling Editor: Rob Freckleton
Fig. S1. Effective strip widths as a function of the number of bins.
Table S1. Details of the distance models fit to each of 50 site-species combinations.
Table S2. Covariate detection model comparisons for data truncated at 250 cm (left side) and data truncated at the 95th percentile of distances (right side).
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
|MEE3_109_sm_tS1-S2-fS1.pdf||521K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.