Correspondence site: http://www.respond2articles.com/MEE/
Geolocation by light: accuracy and precision affected by environmental factors
Version of Record online: 7 FEB 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2012 British Ecological Society
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Volume 3, Issue 3, pages 603–612, June 2012
How to Cite
Lisovski, S., Hewson, C. M., Klaassen, R. H. G., Korner-Nievergelt, F., Kristensen, M. W. and Hahn, S. (2012), Geolocation by light: accuracy and precision affected by environmental factors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3: 603–612. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00185.x
- Issue online: 7 JUN 2012
- Version of Record online: 7 FEB 2012
- Received 7 June 2011; accepted 10 January 2011 Handling Editor: Sean Rands
Fig. S1. Schematic overview for the figures S2 to S5 on the following pages.
Fig. S2. (a) Relationship between day length and sun elevation angle. (b) Three calibration methods for the calculation of positions by the threshold method.
Table S1. Summary of the deviation from theoretical day length and solar midnight/noon with mode values and 10 and 90 percentiles.
Appendix S1. Statistics of stationary geolocators and the resulting deviations in latitude and longitude.
Appendix S2. Calibration.
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
|MEE3_185_sm_AppendixS1-S2.doc||1456K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.