Prevalence of fetal maldispositions in equine referral hospital dystocias

Authors

  • G. S. FRAZER,

    1. Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
    Search for more papers by this author
  • N. R. PERKINS,

    Search for more papers by this author
    • *

      Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

  • T. L. BLANCHARD,

    1. Large Animal Hospital, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 382 West Street Rd, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Dept of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.

  • J. ORSINl,

    1. Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
    Search for more papers by this author
  • W. R. THRELFALL

    1. Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
    Search for more papers by this author

Summary

A retrospective investigation was performed to determine the population characteristics of horses presented for dystocia at 2 equine referral hospitals and the types of fetal maldispositions among these horses. The study population consisted of a similar number of Thoroughbreds (25%), Standardbreds (24%) and draft horses (22%). Most of the current literature pertaining to equine obstetrics is based on a predominately draft horse population (63%). The latter population appeared to have more transverse presentations (P = 0.06), possibly because of the higher number of draft mares. In our study, 43% (6/14) of the transverse presentations occurred in draft breeds. Furthermore, 18% of the draft mare dystocias (6/33) were transverse presentations whereas only 8% (6/73) of the 2 major light breeds (Thoroughbred n = 3; Standardbred n = 3) had transverse presentation dystocias. Despite the significant breed differences between the 2 populations (P<0.001), the prevalence of all other fetal maldispositions was not different from those previously reported. Severe dystocia was often multifactorial, with 86% of cases involving malposture and over half (58%) of these involving more than one extremity. Head and/or neck deviation were a major reason for referral. In 30% of cases malposition was a factor, and abnormal presentation was involved in 24% of referrals.

Ancillary