• Barrey, E., Landjerit, B. and Wolter, R. (1991) Shock and vibration during the hoof impact on different track surfaces. Equine Exerc. Physiol. 3, 97-106.
  • Burn, J.F. (2006) Time domain characteristics of hoof-ground interaction at the onset of stance phase. Equine vet. J. 38, 657-663.
  • Burn, J.F. and Usmar, S.J. (2005) Hoof landing velocity is related to track surface properties in trotting horses. Equine comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2, 37-41.
  • Chateau, H., Robin, D., Falala, S., Pourcelot, P., Valette, J.P., Ravary, B., Denoix, J.M. and Crevier-Denoix, N. (2009a) Effects of a synthetic all-weather waxed track versus a crushed sand track on 3D acceleration of the front hoof in three horses trotting at high speed. Equine vet. J. 41, 247-251.
  • Chateau, H., Robin, D., Simonelli, T., Pacquet, L., Pourcelot, P., Falala, S., Denoix, J.-M. and Crevier-Denoix, N. (2009b) Design and validation of a dynamometric horseshoe for the measurement of three-dimensional ground reaction force on a moving horse. J. Biomech. 42, 336-340.
  • Crevier-Denoix, N., Robin, D., Pourcelot, P., Falala, S., Holden, L., Estoup, P., Desquilbet, L., Denoix, J.-M. and Chateau, H. (2010) Ground reaction force and kinematic analysis of limb loading on two different beach sand tracks in harness trotters. Equine vet. J., Suppl. in press.
  • Gustas, P., Johnston, C. and Drevemo, S. (2006a) Ground reaction force and hoof deceleration patterns on two different surfaces at the trot. Equine Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 3, 209-216.
  • Gustas, P., Johnston, C., Hedenström, U., Roepstorff, L. and Drevemo, S. (2006b) A field study on hoof deceleration at impact in Standardbred trotters at various speeds. Equine comp. Exerc. Physiol. 3, 161-168.
  • Gustas, P., Johnston, C., Roepstorff, L. and Drevemo, S. (2001) In vivo transmission of impact shock waves in the distal forelimb of the horse. Equine vet. J., Suppl. 33, 11-15.
  • Gustas, P., Johnston, C., Roepstorff, L., Drevemo, S. and Lanshammar, H. (2004) Relationships between fore- and hindlimb ground reaction force and hoof deceleration patterns in trotting horses. Equine vet. J. 36, 737-742.
  • Johnston, C. and Back, W. (2006) Hoof ground interaction: when biomechanical stimuli challenge the tissues of the distal limb. Equine vet. J. 38, 634-641.
  • Radin, E.L., Parker, H.G., Pugh, J.W., Steinberg, R.S., Paul, I.L. and Rose, R.M. (1973) Response of joints to impact loading. -3 Relationship between trabecular micofractures and cartilage degeneration. J. Biomech. 6, 51-57.
  • Ratzlaff, M.H., Hyde, M.L., Hutton, D.V., Rathgeber, R.A. and Balch, O.K. (1997) Interrelationship between moisture content of the track, dynamic properties of the track and the locomotor forces exerted by galloping horses. J. equine vet. Sci. 17, 35-42.
  • Ratzlaff, M.H., Wilson, P.D., Hutton, D.V. and Slinker, B.K. (2005) Relationships between hoof-acceleration patterns of galloping horses and dynamic properties of the track. Am. J. vet. Res. 66, 589-595.
  • Robin, D., Chateau, H., Pacquet, L., Falala, S., Valette, J.P., Pourcelot, P., Ravary, B., Denoix, J.M. and Crevier-Denoix, N. (2009) Use of a 3D dynamometric horseshoe to assess the effects of an all-weather waxed track and a crushed sand track at high speed trot: Preliminary study. Equine vet. J. 41, 253-256.
  • Roland, E.S., Hull, M.L. and Stover, S.M. (2005) Design and demonstration of a dynamometric horseshoe for measuring ground reaction loads of horses during racing conditions. J. Biomech. 38, 2102-2112.
  • Serink, M.T., Nachemson, A. and Hansson, G. (1977) The effect of impact loading on rabbit knee joints. Acta Orthop. Scand. 48, 250-262.
  • Setterbo, J.J., Garcia, T.C., Campbell, I.P., Reese, J.L., Morgan, J.M., Kim, S.Y., Hubbard, M. and Stover, S.M. (2009) Hoof accelerations and ground reaction forces of Thoroughbred racehorses measured on dirt, synthetic, and turf track surfaces. Am. J. vet. Res. 70, 1220-1229.
  • Thomason, J.J. and Peterson, M.L. (2008) Biomechanical and mechanical investigations of the hoof-track interface in racing horses. Vet. Clin. N. Am.: Equine Pract. 24, 53-77.