Effect of frusemide on transvascular fluid fluxes across the lung in exercising horses
Version of Record online: 29 SEP 2010
© 2010 EVJ Ltd
Equine Veterinary Journal
Volume 43, Issue 4, pages 451–459, July 2011
How to Cite
VENGUST, M., KERR, C., STAEMPFLI, H. R., PRINGLE, J., HEIGENHAUSER, G. J. and VIEL, L. (2011), Effect of frusemide on transvascular fluid fluxes across the lung in exercising horses. Equine Veterinary Journal, 43: 451–459. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00301.x
- Issue online: 2 JUN 2011
- Version of Record online: 29 SEP 2010
- [Paper received for publication 14.03.10; Accepted 15.07.10]
- exercise-induced pulmonary haemorrhage;
- pulmonary circulation;
- water transport;
Reasons for performing study: Frusemide (Fru) is widely prescribed for management of racehorses experiencing EIPH. The effect of Fru in the lung appears to be a reduction in transcapillary pressures and inhibition of the erythrocyte anion exchange, which may lead to attenuation of transpulmonary fluid fluxes during exercise.
Hypothesis: Treatment with Fru will attenuate transpulmonary fluid fluxes in horses during high intensity exercise.
Methods: In a crossover study, 6 race-fit Standardbred horses were treated with 250 mg of Fru i.v. (FruTr) or placebo (Con) 4 h before exercise on a high speed treadmill until fatigue. Arterial and central mixed venous blood, as well as CO2 elimination and O2 uptake, were sampled. Volume changes across the lung and transvascular fluid fluxes were calculated from changes in haemoglobin, packed cell volume, plasma protein and cardiac output (Q).
Results: During exercise, Q increased in both Con and FruTr, with Q being significantly lower in FruTr (mean ± s.e. 301.8 ± 8.5 l/min at fatigue) compared to Con (336.5 ± 15.6 l/min) (P<0.01). At rest frusemide had no effect on erythrocyte (JER) and transvascular (JV-A) fluid fluxes across the lung. Exercise had a significant effect on JER and JV-A (P≤0.02). During exercise, JER (at fatigue 14.6 ± 2.3 l/min and 11.6 ± 2.2 l/min in Con and FruTr, respectively) and JV-A (at fatigue14.9 ± 2.3 l/min and 12.0 ± 2.2 l/min in Con and FruTr, respectively) were not significantly different between Con and FruTr (P = 0.6 and P = 0.8 for JER and JV-A, respectively).
Conclusions and clinical importance: Fru does not have a measurable effect on JER and JV-A. Cardiac output was reduced in FruTr, suggesting that there were also smaller changes in the capillary recruitment and transvascular transmural hydrostatic pressures; however, this did not effect JV-A. Therefore, Fru at the dose of 250 mg does not appear to be an effective treatment for regulating pulmonary transvascular forces during exercise in horses.