SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barney JB. 1999. How a firm's capabilities affect boundary decisions. Sloan Management Review 40(3): 137145.
  • Berry H, Guillen M, Zhou N. 2010. An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies 41(9): 14601480.
  • Bertrand O, Mol MJ. 2013. The antecedents and innovation effects of domestic and offshore R&D outsourcing: the contingent impact of cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal 34(6): 751760.
  • Brewster C, Wood G, Brookes M. 2008. Similarity, isomorphism, or duality? Recent survey evidence on the human resource management policies of multinational corporations. British Journal of Management 19(4): 320342.
  • Brouthers KD, Hennart J-F. 2007. Boundaries of the firm: insights from international entry mode research. Journal of Management 33(3): 395425.
  • Brusoni S, Prencipe A, Pavitt K. 2001. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly 46(4): 597621.
  • Buckley PJ, Casson M. 1976. The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. Macmillan: London, U.K.
  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.
  • Coase R. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16): 386405.
  • Dikova D, Rao Sahib P, van Witteloostuijn A. 2010. Cross-border acquisition abandonment and completion: the effect of institutional differences and organizational learning in the international business service industry, 1981–2001. Journal of International Business Studies 41(2): 223245.
  • Durvasula S, Netemeyer RG, Andrews JC, Lysonski S. 2006. Examining the cross-national applicability of multi-item, multi-dimensional measures using generalizability theory. Journal of International Business Studies 37(4): 469481.
  • Gerhart B, Fang M. 2005. National culture and human resource management: assumptions and evidence. International Journal of Human Resource Management 16(6): 971986.
  • Goldszmidt RGB, Brito LAL, de Vasconcelos FC. 2011. Country effect on firm performance: a multilevel approach. Journal of Business Research 64(3): 273279.
  • Hall P, Soskice D. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press: New York.
  • Helfat C, Finkelstein S, Mitchell W, Peteraf M, Singh H, Teece D, Winter SG. 2007. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Blackwell: Malden, MA.
  • Hofstede G. 1980. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. SAGE Publications: Beverly Hills, CA.
  • Hofstede G, Minkov M. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd edn). McGraw-Hill: New York.
  • Hofstede G, Van Deusen CA, Mueller CB, Charles TA. 2002. What goals do business leaders pursue? A study in fifteen countries. Journal of International Business Studies 33(4): 785803.
  • House RJ , Hanges PJ , Javidan M , Dorfman PW , Gupta V (eds). 2004. Culture, Leadership, and Organisations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. SAGE Publications: London, U.K.
  • Jackson G, Deeg R. 2008. Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies 39(4): 540561.
  • Jacobides MG, Winter SG. 2005. The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal 26(5): 395413.
  • Jensen PDØ, Petersen B. 2013. Global sourcing of services: risk, process, and collaborative architecture. Global Strategy Journal 3(1): 6787.
  • Kenney M, Florida R. 1995. The transfer of Japanese management styles in two U.S. transplant industries: autos and electronics. Journal of Management Studies 32(6): 789802.
  • Kézdi G. 2004. Robust standard error estimation in fixed-effects panel models. Hungarian Statistical Review 9: 95116.
  • Khanna T, Palepu KG. 1999. Policy shocks, market intermediaries, and corporate strategy: evidence from Chile and India. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 8(2): 271310.
  • Kogut B, Singh H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies 19(3): 411432.
  • Kostova T, Zaheer S. 1999. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review 24(1): 6481.
  • Kotabe M, Mol MJ, Murray J, Parente R. 2012. Outsourcing and its implications for market success: negative curvilinearity, firm resources, and competition. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40(2): 329346.
  • Kroeber AL, Kluckhohn C. 1952. Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Peabody Museum: Cambridge, MA.
  • Lei D, Hitt MA. 1995. Strategic restructuring and outsourcing: the effect of mergers and acquisitions and LBOs on building firm skills and capabilities. Journal of Management 21(5): 835859.
  • Leiblein MJ, Miller DJ. 2003. An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 24(9): 839859.
  • Leiblein MJ, Reuer JJ, Dalsace F. 2002. Do make or buy decisions matter? The influence of organizational governance on technological performance. Strategic Management Journal 23(9): 817833.
  • Lewin AY, Massini S, Peeters C. 2009. Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent. Journal International of Business Studies 40(6): 901925.
  • Loh L, Venkatraman N. 1992. Determinants of information technology outsourcing: a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems 9(1): 724.
  • Mahnke V. 2001. The process of vertical dis-integration: an evolutionary perspective on outsourcing. Journal of Management and Governance 5(3/4): 353379.
  • Marchenko Y. 2006. Estimating variance components in Stata. Stata Journal 6(1): 121.
  • Mayer KJ, Argyres NS. 2004. Learning to contract: evidence from the personal computer industry. Organization Science 15(4): 394410.
  • Mayer KJ, Salomon RM. 2006. Capabilities, contractual hazards, and governance: integrating resource-based cost and transaction cost perspectives. Academy of Management Journal 49(5): 942959.
  • McDermott G, Mudambi R, Parente R. 2013. Strategic modularity and the architecture of multinational firm. Global Strategy Journal 3(1): 17.
  • McSweeney B. 2002. Hofstede's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: a triumph of faith—a failure of analysis. Human Relations 55(1): 89118.
  • Mol MJ. 2005. Does being R&D intensive still discourage outsourcing? Evidence from Dutch manufacturing. Research Policy 34(4): 571582.
  • Mol MJ. 2007. Outsourcing: Design, Process, and Performance. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.
  • Mol MJ, Kotabe M. 2011. Overcoming inertia: drivers of the outsourcing process. Long Range Planning 44(3): 160178.
  • Mol MJ, van Tulder RJM, Beije PR. 2005. The antecedents and performance consequences of international outsourcing. International Business Review 14(5): 599617.
  • Mudambi R. 2008. Location, control, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography 8(5): 699725.
  • Murray JY, Kotabe M, Wildt AR. 1995. Strategic and financial implications of global sourcing strategy: a contingency analysis. Journal of International Business Studies 26(1): 181202.
  • Poppo L, Zenger T. 1998. Testing alternative theories of the firm: transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management Journal 19(9): 853877.
  • Porter ME. 1997. On Competition. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  • Quinn JB. 1999. Strategic outsourcing: leveraging knowledge capabilities. Sloan Management Review 40(3): 921.
  • Rangan S. 2000a. The problem of search and deliberation in economic action: when networks really matter. Academy of Management Review 25(4): 813828.
  • Rangan S. 2000b. The problem of search and deliberation in international exchange: microfoundations to some macro patterns. Journal of International Business Studies 31(2): 205222.
  • Reus TH, Lamont BT. 2009. The double-edged sword of cultural distance in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies 40(8): 12981316.
  • Slangen AHL, Beugelsdijk S. 2010. The impact of institutional hazards on foreign multinational activity: a contingency approach. Journal of International Business Studies 41(7): 980995.
  • Stinchcombe AL. 1965. Social structure and organizations. In Handbook of Organizations, March JG (ed). Rand McNally: Chicago, IL; 153193.
  • Toulan O. 2002. The impact of market liberalization on vertical scope: the case of Argentina. Strategic Management Journal 23(6): 551560.
  • Uzzi B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1): 3567.
  • Webster FE, Wind Y. 1972. Organizational Buying Behavior. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Whitley R. 1999. Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K.
  • Williamson OE. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press: New York.
  • Williamson OE. 1991. Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(2): 269296.