Commentary
Redefining synaesthesia?
Article first published online: 24 FEB 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02003.x
©2011 The British Psychological Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Cohen Kadosh, R. and Terhune, D. B. (2012), Redefining synaesthesia?. British Journal of Psychology, 103: 20–23. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02003.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 9 JAN 2012
- Article first published online: 24 FEB 2011
- Received 3 October 2010; revised version received 3 October 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
In a thought-provoking paper, Simner (2012) highlights and criticizes a number of assumptions concerning synaesthesia. She specifically takes issue with the following assumptions: (1) synaesthesia is strictly a sensory-perceptual phenomenon; (2) consistency of inducer-concurrent pairs is the gold standard for establishing the authenticity of an individual's synaesthesia; and (3) synaesthesia is not heterogeneous. In the wake of this critique, Simner advances a working definition of synaesthesia as a neurological hyper-association that aims to be more inclusive of its variants. We are very sympathetic to Simner's approach and believe that it raises important points that will advance our understanding of synaesthesia. Here we supplement, and sometimes challenge, some of these ideas.

2044-8295/asset/olbannerleft.png?v=1&s=ba65fae0a93133c1d776979ac81decab5709d281)
2044-8295/asset/olbannerright.png?v=1&s=f78ed11d8240f2cf8defe3e5409052aa8b3946f9)
