THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN RETRACTED
Retracted: When failure feels better than success: Self-salience, self-consistency, and affect
Article first published online: 1 MAR 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02002.x
©2011 The British Psychological Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Noordewier, M. K. and Stapel, D. A. (2011), Retracted: When failure feels better than success: Self-salience, self-consistency, and affect. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50: 321–330. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02002.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 MAY 2011
- Article first published online: 1 MAR 2011
- Received 15 February 2010; revised version received 17 September 2010
Vol. 51, Issue 2, 404, Article first published online: 27 APR 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
People like self-consistent feedback because it induces feelings of predictability and control, but they like positive feedback because it induces positive self-esteem. We show that self-salience determines whether people are more consistency- or positivity-driven. When self-knowledge is salient, people's primary responses (i.e., under load) are consistency-driven (people with low self-esteem feel better after negative feedback than after positive feedback, whereas people with high self-esteem feel better after positive feedback than after negative feedback) and controlled responses are positivity-driven (people feel better after positive feedback than after negative feedback, regardless of self-consistency). Without salient self-knowledge this pattern reverses: people's primary responses are positivity-driven, whereas people's controlled responses are consistency-driven.

2044-8309/asset/olbannerleft.png?v=1&s=f80e174073b6a194e766cb6137a57ef69d187913)
2044-8309/asset/olbannerright.png?v=1&s=b860749f06e33b32094ade6fa72db5de1190d8e4)
