• Please log in or register to access this feature.
You have free access to this content

Strategic use of preference confirmation in group decision making: The role of competition and dissent

  1. Claudia Toma1,*,
  2. Ingrid Gilles2,
  3. Fabrizio Butera2

Article first published online: 14 JUN 2011

DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02037.x

Issue

British Journal of Social Psychology

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volume 52, Issue 1, pages 44–63, March 2013

Additional Information

How to Cite

Toma, C., Gilles, I. and Butera, F. (2013), Strategic use of preference confirmation in group decision making: The role of competition and dissent. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52: 44–63. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02037.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    Université Pierre Mendès France, Grenoble, France

  2. 2

    Institut des Sciences Sociales, Université de Lausanne, Switzerland

* Correspondence should be addressed to Fabrizio Butera, Université de Lausanne - ISS-SSP, Vidy, CH 1015 - Lausanne, Switzerland (e-mail: fabrizio.butera@unil.ch ).

  1. Claudia Toma is now at Université Catholique de Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Ingrid Gilles and Fabrizio Butera, Institut des Sciences Sociales, Université de Lausanne, Switzerland. Part of this work is based on Claudia Toma's doctoral dissertation under the supervision of Fabrizio Butera.

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 13 MAR 2013
  2. Article first published online: 14 JUN 2011
  3. Received 12 April 2010; revised version received 13 April 2011

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (539K)

References

  • Abelson, R. P., & Prentice, D. A. (1997). Contrast tests of interaction hypotheses. Psychological Methods , 2, 315–328. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.315
  • Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology , 20, 1–48. doi:10.1080/10463280802613866
  • Brodbeck, F., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2002). The dis-semination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The effects of pre-discussion dissent. European Journal of Social Psychology , 32, 35–56. doi:10.1002/ejsp.74
    Direct Link:
  • Buchs, C., Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (2004). Resource interdependence, student interactions and performance in cooperative learning. Educational Psychology , 24, 291–314. doi:10.1080/0144341042000211661
  • Buchs, C., Pulfrey, C., Gabarrot, F., & Butera, F. (2010). Competitive conflict regulation and informational dependence in peer learning. European Journal of Social Psychology , 40, 418–435. doi:10.1002/ejsp.631
  • Butera, F., Caverni, J.-P., & Rossi, S. (2005). Interaction with a high- versus low-competence influence source in inductive reasoning. Journal of Social Psychology , 145, 173–190. doi:10.3200/SOCP.145.2.173-190
  • Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (1995). Conflict between incompetences and influence of a low-competence source in hypothesis testing. European Journal of Social Psychology , 25, 457–462. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420250408
    Direct Link:
  • Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (2001). Conflicts and social influences in hypothesis testing. In C. De Dreu & N. De Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 160–182). Oxford : Blackwell.
  • Butera, F., Mugny, G., Legrenzi, P., & Pérez, J.A. (1996). Majority and minority influence, task representation and inductive reasoning. British Journal of Social Psychology , 35, 123–136.
    Direct Link:
  • Darnon, C., Butera, F., & Harackiewicz, J. (2007). Achievement goals in social interactions: Learning within a mastery vs. performance goal. Motivation and Emotion , 31, 61–70. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9049-2
  • Darnon, C., Harackiewicz, J., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Quiamzade, A. (2007). Performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals: When uncertainty makes a difference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 33, 813–827. doi:10.1177/0146167207301022
  • Darnon, C., Muller, D., Schrager, S., Pannuzzo, N., & Butera, F. (2006). Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology , 98, 766–776. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.766
  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Carnevale, P. J. D. (2003). Motivational bases for information processing and strategic choice in conflict and negotiation. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 235–291). New York : Academic Press.
  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review , 12, 22–49. doi:10.1177/1088868307304092
  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2005). The possessive self as a barrier to constructive conflict management: Effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 89, 345–357. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.345
  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytical review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 78, 889–905. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.889
  • Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations , 2, 199–231.
  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes . New Haven : Yale University Press.
  • Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 41–80). New York : Academic Press.
  • Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2001). Confirmation bias in group information seeking and its implications for decision making in administration, business and politics. In F. Butera & G. Mugny (Eds.), Social influence in social reality (pp. 53–74). Göttingen : Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
  • Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 65, 959–974. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.959
  • Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1997). The impact of information on small group choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 72, 132–140. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.132
  • Greitemeyer, T. & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 84, 322–339. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.322
  • Homan, A. C., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Van Knippenberg, D., Ilgen, D. R., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2008). Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intra-group differences, and performance of diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal , 58, 1204–1222.
  • Hornsey, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review , 8, 248–264. doi:: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_2
  • Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes . Boston : Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Jetten, J., Hornsey, M. J., & Adarves-Yorno, I. (2006). When group members admit to being conformist: The role of relative intragroup status in conformity self-reports. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 32, 162–173. doi:: 10.1177/0146167205279904
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research . Edina , MN : Interaction Book Company.
  • Johnson, D. W, & Johnson, R. T. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs , 131, 285–358.
  • Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 80, 557–571. doi:: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.557
  • Lam, S. S. K., & Schaubroeck, J. (2000). The effects of group decision support systems on pooling of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology , 85, 565–573. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.565
  • Legrenzi, P., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1991). Majority and minority influence in inductive reasoning: A preliminary study. European Journal of Social Psychology , 21, 359–363. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420210408
    Direct Link:
  • Lemaine, G., & Personnaz, B. (1981). Dissimilation, differential information and social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology , 11, 27–42. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420110102
    Direct Link:
  • Leyens, J.-Ph, Dardenne, B., Yzerbyt, V., Scaillet, N. & Snyder, M. (1999). Confirmation and disconfirmation: Their social advantages. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 199–230). Chichester : Wiley.
  • Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Knowing others’ preferences degrades the quality of group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 98, 794–808. doi:10.1037/a0017627
  • Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is meditated and when mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 89, 852–863. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852
  • Murnighan, J. K., Babcock, L., Thompson, L., & Pillutla, M. M. (1999). The information dilemma in negotiations: Effects of experience, incentives, and integrative potential. International Journal of Conflict Management , 10, 313–339. doi:10.1108/eb022828
  • Nemeth, C. J. (1986). The differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review , 93, 23–32. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.1.23
  • Nemeth, C. & Rogers, J. (1996). Dissent and the search for information. British Journal of Social Psychology , 35, 67–76.
    Direct Link:
  • Ross, M., & Wilson, A. E. (2003). Autobiographical memory and conceptions of self: Getting better all the time. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 12, 66–69. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01228
    Direct Link:
  • Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 91, 1080–1093. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1080
  • Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Luthgens, C., & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 78, 655–669. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.655
  • Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M., & Frey, D. (2002). Productive conflict in group decision making: Genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 88, 563–586. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00001-8
  • Sessa, V. I., Jackson, S. E., & Rapini, D. T. (1995). Workforce diversity: The good, the bad, and the reality. In G. R. Ferris, S. D. Rosen, & D. T. Barnum (Eds.), Handbook of human resources management . Cambridge , MA : Blackwell Publishers.
  • Steinel, W., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2004). Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 86, 419–434. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.419
  • Tjosvold, D., Johnson, D. W., & Lerner, J. (1981). Effects of affirmation of one's competence, personal acceptance, and disconfirmation of one's competence on incorporation of opposing information on problem-solving situations. Journal of Social Psychology , 114, 103–110.
  • Toma, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Hidden profiles and concealed information: Strategic information sharing and use in group decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 35, 793–806. doi:10.1177/0146167209333176
  • Winquist, J. R., & Larson, J. R., Jr. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 74, 371–377. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.371
  • Wittenbaum, G. M., Hollingshead, A. B., & Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs , 71, 286–310. doi:10.1080/0363452042000299894
  • Wittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In A. M. Brower & J. L. Nye (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 3–28). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage Publications.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (539K)