No atheists in foxholes: Arguments for (but not against) afterlife belief buffers mortality salience effects for atheists

Authors

  • Nathan A. Heflick,

    Corresponding author
    1. Psychology Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
      Nathan A. Heflick, Psychology Department, 4202 East Fowler Ave, PCD4118G, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jamie L. Goldenberg

    1. Psychology Department, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Nathan A. Heflick, Psychology Department, 4202 East Fowler Ave, PCD4118G, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.

Abstract

Terror management theory (TMT) posits that people cope with mortality concerns via symbolic immortality (e.g., secular cultural beliefs that outlast death) and/or literal immortality (afterlife belief). However, what happens when these two forms of immortality conflict, as in atheism? Would atheists’ mortality concerns be better assuaged by affirming an afterlife, or by affirming their literal immortality-denying worldview? Drawing on an untested TMT hypothesis, we predicted that atheists would be buffered from mortality concerns if their atheistic worldview – no life after death – was challenged, but not if it was supported. Results confirmed the hypothesis and were also found for theists and agnostics. These findings support TMT's claim that literal immortality is of paramount importance in ameliorating death concerns.

Ancillary