Evaluating the performance of different procedures for constructing confidence intervals for coefficient alpha: A simulation study
Article first published online: 1 FEB 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02038.x
©2012 The British Psychological Society
Issue

British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
Volume 65, Issue 3, pages 467–498, November 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Cui, Y. and Li, J. (2012), Evaluating the performance of different procedures for constructing confidence intervals for coefficient alpha: A simulation study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 65: 467–498. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02038.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 SEP 2012
- Article first published online: 1 FEB 2012
- Received 29 November 2010; revised version received 3 November 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Reliability is one of the most important aspects of testing in educational and psychological measurement. The construction of confidence intervals for reliability coefficients has important implications for evaluating the accuracy of the sample estimate of reliability and for comparing different tests, scoring rubrics, or training procedures for raters or observers. The present simulation study evaluated and compared various parametric and non-parametric methods for constructing confidence intervals of coefficient alpha. Six factors were manipulated: number of items, number of subjects, population coefficient alpha, deviation from essentially parallel condition, item response distribution and type. The coverage and width of different confidence intervals were compared across simulation conditions.

2044-8317/asset/olbannerleft.png?v=1&s=8856da07bc63124271bd41692effae1b4eb4d01b)
2044-8317/asset/olbannerright.png?v=1&s=0e71c188d8e53b18773ec432a90707d049af0643)