SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Allison, D. B., Allison, R. L., Faith, M. S., Paultre, F., & Pi-Sunyer, F. X. (1997). Power and money: Designing statistically powerful studies while minimizing financial costs. Psychological Methods , 2(1), 2033. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.2.1.20
  • Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243277). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Arnold, L. (1974). Stochastic differential equations . New York : Wiley.
  • Bartlett, M. S. (1946). On the theoretical specification and sampling properties of autocorrelated time-series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Supplement) , 7, 2741.
  • Bergstrom, A. R. (1984). Continuous time stochastic models and issues of aggregation over time. In Z. Griliches & M. D. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (Vol. 2). Amsterdam : Elsevier Science.
  • Bergstrom, A. R. (1988). The history of continuous-time econometric models. Econometric Theory , 4, 365383.
  • Boker, S. M. (2007a). Differential equation models for longitudinal data. In S. Menard (Ed.), Handbook of longitudinal research (pp. 639652). New York : Elsevier.
  • Boker, S. M. (2007b). Specifying latent differential equations models. In S. M. Boker & M. J. Wenger (Eds.), Data analytic techniques for dynamical systems in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 131159). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Boker, S. M., Deboeck, P. R., Edler, C., & Keel, P. K. (2010). Generalized local linear approximation of derivatives from time series. In S.-M. Chow, E. Ferrer & F. Hsieh (Eds.), Statistical methods for modeling human dynamics : An interdisciplinary dialogue (pp. 161178). New York : Routledge.
  • Boker, S. M., Neale, M., Maes, H., Wilde, M., Spiegel, M., Brick, T., Spies, J., Estabrook, R., Kenny, S., Bates, T., Mehta, P., & Fox, J. (2011). OpenMx: An Open Source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika , 76(2), 306317. doi: 10.1007/s11336-010-9200-6
  • Boker, S. M., Neale, M. C., & Rausch, J. R. (2004). Latent differential equation modeling with multivariate multi-occasion indicators. In K. van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud & A. Satorra (Eds.), Recent developments on structural equation models: Theory and applications (pp. 151174). Amsterdam : Kluwer.
  • Boker, S. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). A method for modeling the intrinsic dynamics of intraindividual variability: Recovering the parameters of simulated oscillators in multi-wave panel data. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 37, 127160.
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables . New York : Wiley.
  • Butner, J., Amazeen, P., & Mulvey, G. (2005). Multilevel modeling of two cyclical processes: Extending differential structural equation modeling to coupled systems. Psychological Methods , 10, 159177.
  • Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K. S., & Rhymer, R. M. (1947). P-technique demonstrated in determining psychophysical source traits in a normal individual. Psychometrika , 12, 267288. doi: 10.1007/BF02288941
  • Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology , 62, 583619. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356
  • Deboeck, P. R. (2010). Estimating dynamical systems: Derivative estimation hints from Sir Ronald A. Fisher. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 45(4), 725745. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2010.498294
  • Delsing, M. J. M. H., & Oud, J. H. L. (2008). Analyzing reciprocal relationships by means of the continuous-time autoregressive latent trajectory model. Statistica Neerlandica , 62(1), 5882. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2007.00386.x
  • Fahrenberg, J., & Myrtek, M. (Eds.) (1996). Ambulatory assessment. Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies . Seattle , WA : Hogrefe & Huber.
  • Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., Hillary, F., & Slobounov, S. (2011). Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data. NeuroImage . doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.051
  • Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C. M., Hillary, F. G., Ram, N., & Rovine, M. J. (2010). Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: An alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM. NeuroImage , 50, 11181125. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.117
  • Gill, P. E., Murray, W., Saunders, M. A., & Wright, M. H. (1998). User's guide for NPSOL 5.0: A Fortran package for nonlinear programming. Technical Report SOL 86–2, Revised July 30, 1998. Stanford , CA : Systems Optimization Laboratory, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University .
  • Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1987). Taking account of time lags in causal models. Child Development , 58(1), 8092.
  • Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life . Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications . Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Lueke, H. D. (1999). The origins of the sampling theorem. IEEE Communications Magazine , 37, 106108.
  • Lütkepohl, H. (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis . Berlin : Springer.
  • McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology , 60, 577605. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
  • Molenaar, P. C. M. (1985). A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series. Psychometrika , 50(2), 181202. doi: 10.1007/BF02294246
  • Molenaar, P. C. M., & Campbell, C. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychology , 18(2), 112117. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x
    Direct Link:
  • Molenaar, P. C. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2009). The recoverability of P-technique factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 44(1), 130141. doi: 10.1080/00273170802620204
  • Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2003). Mx: Statistical modeling (6th ed.). Richmond , VA : Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University.
  • Nesselroade, J. R., Gerstorf, D., Hardy, S. A., & Ram, N. (2007). Idiographic filters for psychological constructs. Measurement , 5(4), 217235.
  • Oertzen, T. von (2010). Power equivalence in structural equation modelling. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 63, 257272. doi: 10.1348/000711009X441021
  • Oud, J. H. L. (2007a). Comparison of four procedures to estimate the damped linear differential oscillator for panel data. In K. van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 1939). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Oud, J. H. L. (2007b). Continuous time modeling of reciprocal relationships in the cross-lagged panel design. In S. M. Boker & M. J. Wenger (Eds.), Data analytic techniques for dynamical systems (pp. 87129): Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Oud, J. H. L., & Delsing, M. J. M. H. (2010). Continuous time modeling of panel data by means of SEM. In K. van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal research with latent variables (pp. 201244). New York : Springer.
  • Oud, J. H. L., & Folmer, H. (2011). Modeling oscillation: Approximately or exactly? Multivariate Behavioral Research , 46, 985993.
  • Oud, J. H. L., & Jansen, R. A. R. G. (2000). Continuous time state space modeling of panel data by means of SEM. Psychometrika , 65(2), 199215. doi: 10.1007/BF02294374
  • Oud, J. H. L., & Singer, H. (2008). Continuous time modeling of panel data: SEM versus filter techniques. Statistica Neerlandica , 62(1), 428.
  • Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus . New York : Springer.
  • R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing . Vienna : R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Refinetti, R. (2006). Circadian physiology (2nd ed.). Boca Raton , FL : Taylor & Francis.
  • Ruymgaart, P. A., & Soong, T. T. (1985). Mathematics of Kalman-Bucy filtering . Berlin : Springer.
  • Singer, H. (1990). Parameterschätzung in zeitkontinuierlichen dynamischen Systemen[Parameter estimation in continuous time dynamic systems]. Konstanz : Hartung-Gorre.
  • Singer, H. (1992). The aliasing-phenomenon in visual terms. Journal of Mathematical Sociology , 17(1), 3949. doi: 10.1080/0022250x.1992.9990097
  • Singer, H. (1999). Finanzmarkt-Ökonometrie: Zeitstetige Systeme und ihre Anwendung in Ökonometrie und empirischer Kapitalmarktforschung[Finance market econometrics: Continuous time systems and their application in econometrics and empirical capital market research]. Heidelberg : Physica-Verlag.
  • Singer, H. (2012). SEM modeling with singular moment matrices part II: ML-estimation of sampled stochastic differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Sociology , 36(1), 2243. doi: 10.1080/0022250x.2010.532259
  • Takahashi, J., & Zatz, M. (1982). Regulation of circadian rhythmicity. Science , 217(4565), 11041111. doi: 10.1126/science.6287576
  • Voelkle, M. C., Oud, J. H. L., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (in press). An SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: relating authoritarianism and anomia. Psychological Methods .