Commentary
You have free access to this content
The error-statistical philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics: Comments on Gelman and Shalizi: ‘Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics’
Article first published online: 10 OCT 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02064.x
© 2012 The British Psychological Society
Issue

British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
Volume 66, Issue 1, pages 57–64, February 2013
Additional Information
How to Cite
Mayo, D. G. (2013), The error-statistical philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics: Comments on Gelman and Shalizi: ‘Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics’. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66: 57–64. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02064.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 17 JAN 2013
- Article first published online: 10 OCT 2012
- Manuscript Received: 8 FEB 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 8 FEB 2012
References
- , & (1998). Robust Bayesian analysis of selection models. Annals of Statistics, 26, 645–659. doi:10.1214/aos/1028144852
- (2003). Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing? Statistical Science, 18(1), 1–32. doi:10.1214/ss/1056397485
- , & (1987). Testing a point null hypothesis: The irreconcilability of p-values and evidence (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 112–139. doi:10.2307/2289131
- (1962). On the foundations of statistical inference (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 269–326. doi:10.1037/h0044139
- , & (2013). Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 8–38. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02037.x
- , , & (2006). An introduction to Bayesian analysis: Theory and methods. New York: Springer.
- (1996). Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- (2003). Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing? Commentary on J. Berger's Fisher address. Statistical Science, 18(1), 19–24. doi:10.1214/ss/1056397485
- (2010). An error in the argument from conditionality and sufficiency to the likelihood principle. In D. Mayo & A. Spanos (Eds.), Error and inference: Recent exchanges on experimental reasoning, reliability, and the objectivity and rationality of science (pp. 305–314). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- (2011). Statistical science and philosophy of science: Where do/should they meet in 2011 (and beyond)? Rationality, Markets and Morals, 2, 79–102. Retrieved from http://www.rmm-journal.de/htdocs/st01.html
- , & (2011). Error statistics. In P. S. Bandyopadhyay & M. R. Forster (Eds.), Philosophy of statistics (pp. 153–198). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
- (1984). Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statistician. Annals of Statistics, 12, 1151–1172. doi:10.1214/aos/1176346785
- (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
- (1999). Probability theory and statistical inference: Econometric modeling with observational data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- (2000). Revisiting data mining: ‘Hunting’ with or without a license. Journal of Economic Methodology, 7, 231–264. doi:10.1080/13501780050045119
- (2006). Econometrics in retrospect and prospect. In T. C. Mills & K. Patterson (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of econometrics (Vol. 1, pp. 3–58). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
- (2007). Curve fitting, the reliability of inductive inference, and the error-statistical approach. Philosophy of Science, 74(5), 1046–1066.
- (2006). Frequentist Bayes is objective. Bayesian Analysis, 1(3), 451–456. doi:10.1214/06-BA116H

2044-8317/asset/olbannerleft.png?v=1&s=8856da07bc63124271bd41692effae1b4eb4d01b)
2044-8317/asset/olbannerright.png?v=1&s=0e71c188d8e53b18773ec432a90707d049af0643)