Assessing good qualitative research in the work psychology field: A response to the commentaries

Authors

  • Catherine Cassell,

    Corresponding author
    1. Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, UK
      Catherine Cassell, Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Booth Street West, Manchester, M15 6PB, UK (e-mail: catherine.cassell@mbs.ac.uk).
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Gillian Symon

    1. Birkbeck, University of London, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

Catherine Cassell, Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Booth Street West, Manchester, M15 6PB, UK (e-mail: catherine.cassell@mbs.ac.uk).

Abstract

This article is a response to three commentaries (Halbesleben, 2011; Hickson, 2011 & Locke, 2011) on ‘Assessing “good” qualitative research in the work psychology field: A narrative analysis’ (Cassell & Symon, 2011).

Ancillary