• Please log in or register to access this feature.

Original Article

You have free access to this content

Who are we made to think we are? Contextual variation in organizational, workgroup and career foci of identification

  1. Lynne J. Millward1,
  2. S. Alexander Haslam2,*

Article first published online: 24 OCT 2012

DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02065.x

Issue

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Volume 86, Issue 1, pages 50–66, March 2013

Additional Information

How to Cite

Millward, L. J. and Haslam, S. A. (2013), Who are we made to think we are? Contextual variation in organizational, workgroup and career foci of identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86: 50–66. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02065.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, UK

  2. 2

    School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

*Correspondence should be addressed to S. Alexander Haslam, School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia 4083, Queensland, Australia (e-mail: a.haslam@uq.edu.au).

  1. Sadly, in the process of revising this manuscript for publication, Lynne Millward was diagnosed with oesophageal cancer. Her health declined rapidly and she died on March 6th 2012 at the age of 49. Lynne was renowned for her passionate and tireless teaching, her meticulous and consummate scholarship, and her unstinting commitment to people and causes she held dear \x97 one of which was Occupational and Organizational Psychology. She will be very sadly missed, but her legacy will endure.

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 4 FEB 2013
  2. Article first published online: 24 OCT 2012
  3. Manuscript Revised: 28 AUG 2012
  4. Manuscript Received: 8 OCT 2010

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (179K)

References

  • Akerlof, G., & Kranton, R. (2009). Identity economics: How our identities shape our work, wages and wellbeing. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E., & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Organizational identity and identification. Academy of Management Review, [Special issue] 25. doi:10.5465/AMR.2000.2791600
  • Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, (Vol. 8, pp. 263–295). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34, 325–374. doi:10.1177/0149206308316059
  • Ashforth, B. E., & Johnson, S. A. (2001). Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 31–48). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4278999
  • Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., & Palacios, M. S. (2004). The backlash of token mobility: The impact of past group experiences on individual ambition and effort. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1433–1445. doi:10.1177/0146167204264336
  • Boyne, G. (2002). Public and private management: What's the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39, 97–122. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00284
    Direct Link:
  • Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001
  • Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152. doi:10.1037/h0043805
  • Cameron, J. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239–262. doi: 10.1080/13576500444000047
  • Cornelissen, J. P., Haslam, S. A., & Balmer, J. M. T. (2007). Social identity, organizational identity and corporate identity: Towards an integrated understanding of processes, patternings and products. British Journal of Management, 18, 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00522.x
    Direct Link:
  • Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3, 127–150.
  • Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: The role of image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517–554. doi:10.2307/256405
  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organisational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263. doi:10.2307/2393235
  • Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459–478. doi:10.5465/AMR.2004.13670967
  • Fiol, C. M. (2002). Capitalizing in paradox: The role of language in transforming organizational identities. Organization Science, 13, 653–666. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.6.653.502
  • Fiol, C. M., Hatch, M. J., & Golden-Biddle, K. (1998). Organizational culture and identity: What's the difference anyway? In D. Whetten & P. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations. Building theory through conversation (pp. 56–62). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fiol, C. M., & O'Connor, E. J. (2005). Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organization Science, 16, 19–32. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0101
  • Grant, A. M., & Wall, T. D. (2009). The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation: Why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 653–686. doi:10.1177/1094428108320737
  • Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
  • Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003). The ASPIRe model: Actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 83–113. doi:10.1348/096317903321208907
    Direct Link:
  • Haslam, S. A., & Ellemers, N. (2005). Social identity in industrial and organizational psychology: Concepts, controversies and contributions. In G. P. Hodgkinson (Ed.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 39–118). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (1999). Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 809–818. doi:10.1177/0146167299025007004
  • Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & McGarty, C. (1995). Social categorization and group homogeneity: Changes in the perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trait favorableness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 139–160. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01054.x
    Direct Link:
  • Haslam, S. A., Postmes, T., & Ellemers, N. (2003). More than a metaphor: Organizational identity makes organizational life possible. British Journal of Management, 14, 357–369. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2003.00384.x
    Direct Link:
  • Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2010). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. London, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Postmes, T., Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Webley, P. (2006). Sticking to our guns: Social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment to faltering organizational projects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 607–628. doi:10.1002/job.370
    Direct Link:
  • Hatch, M. J. (1993). The dynamics of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 18, 657–693. doi:10.5465/AMR.1993.9402210154
  • Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2002). The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations, 55, 989–1018. doi:10.1177/0018726702055008181
  • Herriot, P., & Scott-Jackson, W. (2002). Globalization, social identities and employment. British Journal of Management, 13, 249–257. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00241
    Direct Link:
  • Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. (2nd ed.) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Jackson, J. W., & Smith, E. R. (1999). Conceptualizing social identity: A new framework and evidence for the impact of different dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 120–135. doi:10.1177/0146167299025001010
  • Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & McAuliffe, B. J. (2002). ‘We're all individuals'?: Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189–207. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.65
    Direct Link:
  • Johnson, M. D., Morgeson, F. P., Ilgen, D. R., Meyer, C. J., & Lloyd, J. W. (2006). Multiple professional identities: Examining differences in identification across work-related targets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 9, 498–506. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.498
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.) (2000). Choices, values and frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, W., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multi-component) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
  • Lipponen, J., Helkama, K., Olkkonen, M., & Juslin, M. (2005). Predicting the different profiles of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 1–17. doi:10.1348/096317904X22935
    Direct Link:
  • Lyons, S. T., Duxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (2006). A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees. Public Administration Review, 66, 605–618. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00620.x
    Direct Link:
  • Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123. doi:10.1002/job.4030130202
    Direct Link:
  • Markovits, Y., Davis, A. J., & van Dick, R. (2007). Organizational commitment profiles and job satisfaction among Greek private and public sector employees. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 7, 77–99. doi:10.1177/1470595807075180
  • Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture. London, UK: Sage.
  • McGarty, C. (1999). The categorization process in social psychology. London, UK: Sage.
  • Millward, L. J. (1995). Contextualising social identity in considerations of what it means to be a nurse. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 303–324. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420250305
    Direct Link:
  • Millward, L. J. (2005). Understanding occupational and organizational psychology. London, UK: Sage.
  • Millward, L. J., Banks, A., & Riga, K. (2010). Effective self-regulating teams: A generative psychological approach. Team Performance Management, 16, 50–73. doi:10.1108/13527591011028924
  • Millward, L. J., Haslam, S. A., & Postmes, T. (2007). Putting employees in their place: The impact of hot-desking on organizational and team identification. Organization Science, 18, 547–559. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0265
  • Millward, L. J., & Postmes, T. (2010). Who we are affects how we do: The financial benefits of organizational identification. British Journal of Management, 21, 327–379. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00667.x
  • Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory (pp. 117– 141). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (1991). Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 125–144. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00930.x
    Direct Link:
  • Ouwerkerk, J. W., Ellemers, N., & de Gilder, D. (1999). Group commitment and individual effort in experimental and organizational contexts. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears & B. J. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 184–204). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Paulus, P. B., & van der Zee, K. (2004). Should there be a romance between teams and groups? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 475–480. doi:10.1348/0963179042596496
    Direct Link:
  • Peteraf, M., & Shanley, M. (1997). Getting to know you: A theory of strategic group identity. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 165–186. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<165::AID-SMJ914>3.3.CO;2-R
  • Prati, L. M., McMillan-Capehart, A., & Karriker, J. H. (2009). Affecting organizational identity: A manager's influence. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15, 404–415. doi:10.1177/1548051809331502
  • Rainey, H. G., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 447–470.
  • Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 433–458. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794663
  • Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 547–568. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007
  • Riketta, M., & van Dick, R. (2005). Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 67, 460–510. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.06.001
  • Riketta, M., van Dick, R., & Rousseau, D. M. (2006). Employee attachment in the short and long run. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 5, 85–93. doi:10.1026/1617-6391.5.3.85
  • Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328–350. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0
  • Rosch, E. H. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Rosch, E. H., Mervis, B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Bayes-Braen, P. (1976). Basic object in natural categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–429. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1998). Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 217–233. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<217::AID-JOB931>3.0.CO;2-N
    Direct Link:
  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Sparrow, P. R. (2000). New employee behaviours, work designs and forms of work organization. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15, 202–218. doi:10.1108/02683940010320561
  • Tajfel, H. (Ed.) (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London, UK: Academic Press.
  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boudler, CO: Westview Press.
  • Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears & B. J. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6–34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. A. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454–463.
  • Tversky, A. (1977). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352. doi:10.1037/h0026750
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683
  • van Dick, R. (2001). Identification in organizational contexts: Linking theory and research from social and organizational psychology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 265–283.
    Direct Link:
  • van Dick, R. (2004). My job is my castle: Identification in organizational contexts. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 171–204). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • van Dick, R., Stellmacher, J., Wagner, U., Lemmer, G., & Tissington, P. A. (2009). Group membership salience and task performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 609–626. doi:10.1108/02683940910989011
  • van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171–191. doi:10.1348/096317904774202135
    Direct Link:
  • van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O. (2005). Category salience and organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 273–285. doi:10.1348/096317905X25779
    Direct Link:
  • van Knippenberg, D., & van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organisational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137–147.
    Direct Link:
  • van Knippenberg, D., & van Leeuwen, E. (2001). Organizational identity after a merger: Sense of continuity as the key to post-merger identification. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 249–264). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Wieseke, J. M., Ahearne, S. K., Lam, S. K., & van Dick, R. (2009). The role of leaders in internal marketing. Journal of Marketing, 73, 123–145. doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.2.123
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (179K)