Motivational interviewing training in juvenile corrections: A comparison of outside experts and internal trainers
Article first published online: 24 NOV 2011
© 2011 The British Psychological Society
Legal and Criminological Psychology
Volume 18, Issue 2, pages 262–273, September 2013
How to Cite
Doran, N., Hohman, M. and Koutsenok, I. (2013), Motivational interviewing training in juvenile corrections: A comparison of outside experts and internal trainers. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18: 262–273. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02036.x
- Issue published online: 29 AUG 2013
- Article first published online: 24 NOV 2011
- Received 12 August 2011; revised version received 24 October 2011
Purpose. This study was designed to compare expert consultant trainers and less experienced, in-house trainers in providing basic training in motivational interviewing (MI) for juvenile corrections employees.
Methods. Trainees (n= 1,552) attended a 3-day workshop administered by either a member of the Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) or a corrections staff member who had been trained by a MINT trainer.
Results. Pre- to post-test MI knowledge and skill gains did not vary between MINT expert and internal trainers, and increased for both groups. MINT trainees were more motivated to learn MI and expected it to be more effective in their work compared with those trained by corrections staff. MINT trainers were perceived as more knowledgeable about the topic, whereas corrections staff trainers were rated as better at utilizing handouts and visual aids. The groups did not differ on other measures of trainee satisfaction.
Conclusions. These data suggest that a train-the-trainers model, in which expert consultants provide initial trainings to develop a pool of staff to provide subsequent trainings, may be as effective as a model that relies exclusively on expert trainers.