SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Akashi T, Mizuno I, Okumura A & Fuse H. (2005) Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men. Arch Androl 51, 437442.
  • Akashi T, Watanabe A, Komiya A & Fuse H. (2010) Evaluation of the sperm motility analyzer system (SMAS) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men. Syst Biol Reprod Med 56, 473477.
  • Barratt CLR, Bjorndahl L, Menkveld R & Mortimer D. (2011) ESHRE special interest group for andrology basic semen analysis course: a continued focus on accuracy, quality, efficiency and clinical relevance. Hum Reprod 26, 32073212.
  • Bjorndahl L, Barratt CL, Fraser LR, Kvist U & Mortimer D. (2002) ESHRE basic semen analysis courses 1995-1999: immediate beneficial effects of standardized training. Hum Reprod 17, 12991305.
  • Bland JM & Altman DG. (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307310.
  • Brazil C, Swan SH, Tollner CR, Treece C, Drobnis EZ, Wang C et al. (2004) Quality control of laboratory methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study. J Androl 25, 645656.
  • Ferrara F, Daverio R, Mazzini G, Bonini P & Banfi G. (1997) Automation of human sperm cell analysis by flow cytometry. Clin Chem 43, 801807.
  • Hansen C, Christensen P, Stryhn H, Hedeboe AM, Rode M & Boe-Hansen G. (2002) Validation of the FACSCount AF system for determination of sperm concentration in boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim 37, 330334.
  • Hansen C, Vermeiden T, Vermeiden JP, Simmet C, Day BC & Feitsma H. (2006) Comparison of FACSCount AF system, Improved Neubauer hemocytometer, Corning 254 photometer, SpermVision, UltiMate and NucleoCounter SP-100 for determination of sperm concentration of boar semen. Theriogenology 66, 21882194.
  • Jorgensen N, Auger J, Giwercman A, Irvine DS, Jensen TK, Jouannet P et al. (1997) Semen analysis performed by different laboratory teams: an intervariation study. Int J Androl 20, 201208.
  • Jorgensen N, Carlsen E, Nermoen I, Punab M, Suominen J, Andersen AG et al. (2002) East-West gradient in semen quality in the Nordic-Baltic area: a study of men from the general population in Denmark, Norway, Estonia and Finland. Hum Reprod 17, 21992208.
  • Jorgensen N, Asklund C, Carlsen E & Skakkebaek NE. (2006) Coordinated European investigations of semen quality: results from studies of Scandinavian young men is a matter of concern. Int J Androl 29, 5461.
  • Jorgensen N, Joensen UN, Jensen TK, Jensen MB, Almstrup K, Olesen IA et al. (2012) Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men. BMJ Open 2, pii: e000990.
  • Krause W. (1995) Computer-assisted semen analysis systems: comparison with routine evaluation and prognostic value in male fertility and assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 10, 6066.
  • Mallidis C, Cooper TG, Hellenkemper B, Lablans M, Uckert F & Nieschlag E. (2012) Ten years' experience with an external quality control program for semen analysis. Fertil Steril 98, 611616.
  • Tomlinson MJ, Pooley K, Simpson T, Newton T, Hopkisson J, Jayaprakasan K et al. (2010) Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms. Fertil Steril 93, 19111920.
  • World Health Organization (2010) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 5th edn. WHO Press, Geneva.