Article
Does Nature Have to Be Natural? The Question of Wetland Interpretation
Article first published online: 21 DEC 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.2153-9561.2011.01052.x
© 2011 by the American Anthropological Association
Additional Information
How to Cite
Jones, B. K. (2011), Does Nature Have to Be Natural? The Question of Wetland Interpretation. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment, 33: 83–94. doi: 10.1111/j.2153-9561.2011.01052.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 21 DEC 2011
- Article first published online: 21 DEC 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- wetlands;
- cranberry bogs;
- New Jersey;
- Massachusetts;
- metaphors
Abstract
Through a study of modified natural landscapes, particularly cranberry bogs, this article investigates the broad understandings of nature and wilderness. In relying on a nature as wilderness paradigm to identify what is ecologically valuable, the potential exists to disregard altered nature as ecologically damaged. This approach to understanding nature discounts the value of agricultural sites that demonstrate another way of seeing nature, one that appreciates its resilience. This article strives to understand how current metaphors that define nature as pristine fail to consider how altered nature can and does have significant ecological value.

2153-9561/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=248ccfe19ecc95c50dcdc4434f61b714e9191e29)
