Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing

Authors

  • David L. Streiner PhD,

    Professor, Corresponding author
    1. University of Toronto – Psychiatry, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    2. McMaster University – Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jan Kottner PhD

    Scientific Director
    1. Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin – Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Scales and instruments play an important role in health research and practice. It is important that studies that report on their psychometric properties do so in a way such that readers can understand what was done and what was found. This paper is a guide to writing articles about the development and assessment of these tools. It covers what should be in the abstract and how key words should be chosen. The article then discusses what should be in the main parts of the paper: the introduction, methods, results and discussion. In each of these parts, it suggests the statistical tests that should be used and how to report them. The emphasis throughout the paper is that reliability and validity are not fixed properties of a scale, but depend on an interaction among it, the population being evaluated and the circumstances under which the instrument is administered.

Ancillary