Paper No. JAWRA-13-0041-P of the Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA).
Featured Collection: Contaminants of Emerging Concern II William Battaglin and Alan Kolok - Guest Editors
Comparing Contaminant Removal Costs for Aquifer Recharge with Wastewater with Water Supply Benefits†
Article first published online: 1 APR 2014
© 2014 American Water Resources Association
JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
Volume 50, Issue 2, pages 324–333, April 2014
How to Cite
2014 Comparing Contaminant Removal Costs for Aquifer Recharge with Wastewater with Water Supply BenefitsJournal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 50(2): 324–333. DOI: 10.1111/jawr.12160, , , , , , .
Discussions are open until six months from print publication.
- Issue published online: 1 APR 2014
- Article first published online: 1 APR 2014
- Manuscript Accepted: 28 AUG 2013
- Manuscript Received: 1 MAR 2013
- reverse osmosis;
- ultraviolet light;
- public health;
- groundwater recharge;
- contaminants of emerging concerns
The use of waters of impaired quality has been suggested as a means to expand available water resources supply for water-limited communities. An ongoing concern is the safety of supplies that use wastewater because of the potential for introduction of emerging contaminants such as pharmaceuticals into drinking water supplies. Prior research into contaminants of emerging concerns (CECs) have included a variety of methods, but the only consistent removal is with reverse osmosis (RO) membranes, ultraviolet light (UV), and advanced oxidation processes (AOP). However, few of these prior studies have measurable quantities of these contaminants in the influent wastewater, so determining actual removal percentages is difficult. This project was designed to evaluate the removal of CECs to verify that a 3-log removal of common constituents was realized. Spike testing was used to compare to prior research and to evaluate whether the project costs were competitive with other forms of reuse or other water supplies. The combination of RO/UV/AOP was effective at obtaining a 3-log removal of CECs, but the RO and UV/AOP processes alone were not capable of removing all substances. However, despite the extensive treatment, the proposed process was both competitive cost-wise and met the water quality goals.