The first author is from the University of New South Wales and University of Western Australia. The second author is from the University of Western Australia. The third author is from the Business School, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009. The authors thank the UWA Business School for research funds and Jonathon Burrows and Jonathan Wei Peng Seow for research assistance. The authors acknowledge the helpful comments received from the journal Editors Peter Pope, Andrew Stark and Martin Walker and from Yael Almog, Mary Barth, Mike Bradbury, David Cairns, Julie Cotter, Philippe Danjou, Holger Erchinger, Carol Ann Frost, Keith Godfrey, Niclas Hellman, Anja Hjelström, Martin Hoogendorn, H.Y. Izan, Howell Jackson, Sei-Ichi Kaneko, Chris Nobes, Jim Ohlson, Carol Page, Katherine Schipper, Peter Verhoeven, Michael Vorraber, Marvin Wee, Wei Guo Zhang and seminar participants at Cass Business School City University, King's College University of London, Catholic University Leuven, Stanford University, Stockholm School of Economics, University of Sydney, University of Technology Sydney's 2010 Accounting Symposium, the Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ) annual meeting Adelaide 2009, the American Accounting Association (AAA) annual meeting New York 2009, the European Accounting Association (EAA) annual meeting Ljubljana 2012, the South African Academic Accounting Association (SAAAA) annual meeting George 2011 and the IFRS Foundation 2012. (Paper received December, 2013; revised version accepted December, 2013).
Measuring Country Differences in Enforcement of Accounting Standards: An Audit and Enforcement Proxy
Article first published online: 24 FEB 2014
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting
Volume 41, Issue 1-2, pages 1–52, January/February 2014
How to Cite
Brown, P., Preiato, J. and Tarca, A. (2014), Measuring Country Differences in Enforcement of Accounting Standards: An Audit and Enforcement Proxy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41: 1–52. doi: 10.1111/jbfa.12066
- Issue published online: 24 FEB 2014
- Article first published online: 24 FEB 2014
- security market regulation;
- external audit;
- accounting quality
In this paper we present an index designed to capture differences between countries in relation to the institutional setting for financial reporting, specifically the auditing of financial statements and the enforcement of compliance with each country's accounting standards. The use of a common set of standards such as International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) aims, in broad terms, to promote the comparability and transparency of financial statements and to improve the quality of financial reporting. However, the effectiveness of IFRS adoption may be hampered by differences, across countries, in the institutional setting in which financial reporting occurs. Studies of outcomes from adopting IFRS use a range of legal system proxies to capture these country differences, but the proxies are deficient in that they seldom focus explicitly on factors that affect how compliance with accounting standards is promoted through external audit and the activities of independent enforcement bodies. To address this deficiency, we calculate measures of the quality of the public company auditors’ working environment (AUDIT) and the degree of accounting enforcement activity (ENFORCE) by independent enforcement bodies. We do this for 51 countries for each of the years 2002, 2005 and 2008, using publicly available data provided by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), the World Bank and the national securities regulators. Preliminary tests suggest our indices have additional explanatory power (over more general legal proxies) for country-level measures of economic and market activity, financial transparency and earnings management. We expect they will prove useful to researchers and other interested parties who require country-level measures that focus on the degree of enforcement of financial reporting practices.