SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Avery, P. (2007). Open science grid: Building and sustaining general cyberinfrastructure Using a collaborative approach [Electronic Version]. First Monday, 12. Retrieved 9. November 2006 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_6/avery/.
  • Bany Mohammed, A., & Altmann, J. (2010). A funding and governing model for achieving sustainable growth of computing e-infrastructures. Annals of Telecommunications, 65(11), 739756.
  • Barjak, F., Lane, J., Kertcher, Z., Poschen, M., Procter, R., & Robinson, S. (2009). Case studies of e-infrastructure adoption. Social Science Computer Review, 27(4), 583600.
  • Barjak, F., Lane, J., Poschen, M., Procter, R., Robinson, S., & Wiegand, G. (2010). e-infrastructure adoption in the social sciences and humanities - cross-national evidence from the AVROSS survey. Information, Communication & Society, 13(5), 635651.
  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
  • Berman, F. & Brady, H. (2005). Final Report: NSF SBE-CISE Workshop on Cyberinfrastructure and the Social Sciences. Retrieved 3 October 2006, from: http://vis.sdsc.edu/sbe/reports/SBE-CISE-FINAL.pdf.
  • Borgman, C. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bos, N., Zimmerman, A., Olson, J., Yew, J., Yerkie, J., Dahl, E., et al. (2007). From shared databases to communities of practice: A taxonomy of collaboratories. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 652672.
  • Cummings, J. N., Finholt, T. A., Foster, I., Kesselman, C., & Lawrence, K. (2008). Beyond being there: A blueprint for advancing the design, development, and evaluation of virtual organizations. Retrieved 28.04.2009, from http://www.ci.uchicago.edu/events/VirtOrg2008/VO_report.pdf.
  • David, P. A. (2006). Toward a cyberinfrastructure for enhanced scientific collaboration: Providing its “soft” foundations may be the hardest part. In B. Kahin & D. Foray (Eds.), Advancing knowledge and the knowledge economy (pp. 431453). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • David, P. A., & Spence, M. (2003). Towards institutional infrastructures for e-science. Final report of the OII project on “The Institutional Infrastructure of e-Science: The Scope of the Issues” to the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). Retrieved 29.09.2003, from http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/E-ScienceRpt_Final-150903.pdf.
  • European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures ESFRI (2008). European roadmap for research infrastructures: Update 2008. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Foster, I., & Kesselman, C. (2006). Scaling system-level science: Scientific exploration and IT implications. Computer, 39(11), 3139.
  • Fry, J., & Schroeder, R. (2010). Disciplinary differences in e-research. In W. Dutton & P. Jeffreys (Eds.), World wide research (pp. 257271). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Fry, J., & Schroeder, R. (2009). Towards a sociology of e-research: Shaping practice and advancing knowledge. In N. Jankowski (Ed.), e-Research: Transformation in Scholarly Practice (pp. 3553). New York: Routledge.
  • Gläser, J. (2006). Wissenschaftliche Produktionsgemeinschaften: Die soziale Ordnung der Forschung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
  • Gläser, J., & Lange, S. (2007). Wissenschaft. In A. Benz, S. Lütz, U. Schimank & g. Simonis (Eds.), Handbuch Governance: Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder (pp. 437451). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Heimeriks, G., & Vasileiadou, E. (2008). Changes or transition? Analysing the use of ICTs in the sciences. Social Science Information, 47(5), 529.
  • Iacono, C. S., & Freeman, P. A. (2006). Cyberinfrastructure-in-the-making: Can we get there from here? In B. Kahin & D. Foray (Eds.), Advancing knowledge and the knowledge economy (pp. 455477). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Jackson, S. J., Edwards, P. N., Bowker, G. C., & Knobel, C. P. (2007). Understanding infrastructure: History, heuristics and cyberinfrastructure policy [Electronic Version]. First Monday, 12. Retrieved 03.09.2010 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1904/1786.
  • Jankowski, N. (2009). The contours and challenges of e-research. In N. Jankowski (Ed.), e-Research: Transformation in scholarly practice (pp. 331). New York: Routledge.
  • Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., & Uzzi, B. (2008). Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science, 322(5905), 12591262.
  • Kling, R., McKim, G., & King, A. (2003). A bit more to it: Scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 4767.
  • Luo, A. & Olson, J. (2008). How collaboratories affect scientists from developing countries. In G. Olson, A. Zimmerman & N. Bos (Eds.), Scientific collaboration on the Internet (pp. 365376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Mackie, C. J. (2007). Cyberinfrastructure, institutions, and sustainability [Electronic Version]. First Monday, 12. Retrieved 9. November 2006 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_6/mackie/.
  • Meyer, E.T., Madsen, C., & Fry, J. (2010). Digital resources and the future of libraries. In W.H. Dutton & P. Jeffreys (Eds.). World wide research: Reshaping the sciences and humanities (pp. 8397). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Meyer, E.T., & Schroeder, R. (2009). Untangling the web of e-research: Towards a sociology of online knowledge. Journal of Informetrics 3(3), 246260.
  • Park, H. W. (2010). Mapping the e-science landscape in South Korea using the webometrics method. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 211229.
  • Powell, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (1st ed., vol. 12, pp. 295336).
  • Research Councils UK (2010). Delivering the UK's e-infrastructure for Research and Innovation. Report commissioned by the Department for Business Innovation and Skills. Retrieved 30 June 2011 from www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/research/esci/e-infrastructurereviewreport.pdf.
  • Rieger, O. (2009). Search engine use behaviour of students and faculty: User perceptions and implications for future research [Electronic Version]. First Monday, 14 (12). Retrieved 10 June 2011 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2716/2385.
  • Soon, C., & Park, H. W. (2009). The rise of e-science in Asia. Dreams and realities for social science research: Case studies of Singapore and South Korea. In N. Jankowski (Ed.), e-Research: Transformation in scholarly practice (pp. 109128). New York: Routledge.
  • Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111134.
  • Shrum, W., Genuth, J., & Chompalov, I. (2007). Structures of scientific collaboration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 1728.
  • Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (1985). Community, market, state - and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. European Sociological Review, 1, 119138.
  • Thompson, G. F. (2003). Between hierarchies and markets: The logic and limits of network forms of organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Voss, A., Mascord, M., Fraser, M., Jirotka, M., Procter, R., Halfpenny, P. et al. (2007a). e-Research Infrastructure Development and Community Engagement. Paper presented at the UK e-Science 2007 All Hands Meeting. Retrieved 31 October 2007 from http://www.allhands.org.uk/2007/proceedings/papers/866.pdf.
  • Voss, A., Procter, R., Hewitt, T., Asgari-Targhi, M., Daw, M., Baun, C., et al. (2007b). Sustainability of e-infrastructures (for the Social Sciences). Paper presented at the Third International Conference on e-Social Science. Retrieved 30 June 2011 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.4642&rep=&rep1type&=pdf.
  • Whitley, R. (2010, October). Changing governance and authority relations in the public sciences. Paper presented at the “Tentative governance in emerging science and technology” conference, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Williamson, O. E. (1971, May). The vertical integration of production: Market failure considerations. The American Economic Review, 61, 112123.
  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York. Free Press.
  • Wittek, R. (2007). Governance from a sociological perspective. In D. Jansen (Ed.), New forms of governance in research organizations: Disciplinary approaches, interfaces and integration. (pp. 7397). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 10361039.
  • Ynalvez, M.A., Duque, R.B., & Shrum, W. 2010. Shaping research in developing areas. In W.H. Dutton and P. Jeffreys (Eds.), World wide research: Reshaping the sciences and humanities (pp. 325342). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.