SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alexa (n.d.). Top sites. Retrieved September 13, 2010 from http://www.alexa.com/topsites
  • Briggs, P., Burford, B., De Angeli, A., & Lynch, P. (2002). Trust in online advice. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3), 321332.
  • Delia, J. G. (1976). A constructivist analysis of the concept of credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62(4), 361375.
  • Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
  • Eastin, M. S. (2001). Credibility assessment of online health information: The effects of source, expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(4). Retrieved September 11, 2009, from http://jcc4.indiana.edu/vol6/issue4/eastin.html
  • Eysenbach, G., & Köhler, C. (2002). How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the World-Wide-Web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal, 334, 573577.
  • Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2007). The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media & Society, 9(2), 319342.
  • Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using Computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., & Fang, N. et al. (2001). What makes Web sites credible? A report on a large quantitative study. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001 Conference on human factors in computing systems. Seattle, WA.
  • Fox, S. (2006). Online health search 2006. Retrieved August 28, 2010, from http://www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2006/PIP_Online_Health_2006.pdf. pdf.
  • Freeman, K. S., & Spyridakis, J. H. (2004). An examination of factors that affect credibility of online health information. Technical Communication, 51(2), 239263.
  • Gass, R. H., & Seiter, J. S. (1999). Persuasion, social influence and compliance gaining. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Gunther, A. C. (1988). Attitude extremity and trust in media. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 279287.
  • Hampton-Sosa, W. & Koutasis, M. (2005). The effect of Web site perceptions on initial trust in the owner company. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(1), 5581.
  • Hargittai, E., Fullerton, F., Menchen-Trevino, F., & Thomas, K. (2010). Trust online: Young adults' evaluation of Web content. International Journal of Communication, 4, 468494.
  • Hargittai, E. (2007). The social, political, economic, and cultural dimensions of search engines: An introduction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 769777.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408420.
  • Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2010). How today's college students use Wikipedia for course-related research. First Monday, 15(3).
  • Hilligos, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing and Management, 44, 14671484.
  • Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635650.
  • Kalyanaraman, S., & Ivory, J. D. (2009). Enhanced information scent, selective discounting, or consummate breakdown: The psychological effects of Web-based search results. Media Psychology, 12, 295319.
  • Kiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication and Society, 4(4), 381403.
  • Lim, S. (2009). How and why do colleague students use Wikipedia? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 21892202.
  • Lindgaard, G, & Dudek, C. (2003). What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? Interacting with Computers, 15(3), 429452.
  • Mager, A. (2009). Mediated health: Sociotechnical practices of providing and using online health information. New Media & Society, 11(7), 11231142.
  • Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413439.
  • Metzger, M. J. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 20782091.
  • Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R., & McCann, R. M. (2003). Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Communication Yearbook, 27, 293335.
  • Newhagon, J., & Nass, C. (1989). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 66(2), 277284.
  • Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordances, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 3843.
  • O'Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. Newsbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2007). In Google we trust: Users' decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 801823.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown.
  • Pirolli, P. & Card, S. K. (1999). Information foraging. Psychology Review, 106, 643675.
  • Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243281.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879891.
  • Robins, D., Holmes, J., & Stansbury, M. (2009). Consumer health information on the Web: The relationship of visual design and perceptions of credibility. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 1329.
  • Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathemathical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Sharp H., Rogers, Y., & Preece, J. (2007). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Shon, J., Marshall, J., & Musen, M. A. (2000). The impact of displayed awards on the credibility retention of Web site information. Proceedings of AMIA Symposium 2000, 794798.
  • Sundar, S. S. (1998). Effect of source attribution on perceptions of online news stories. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 5568.
  • Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. Metzger & A. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73100). The John D. and Catherine T. McArthur foundation series on digital media and learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Sundar, S. S., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Hastall, M. R. (2007). News cues: Information scent and cognitive heuristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(3), 366378.
  • Sundar, S. S., & Nass C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 5272.
  • Wathen, N. C., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 134144.
  • Wilson, T. D., Ford, N. J., Foster, A. E., & Spink, A. (2002). Information seeking and mediated searching: Part 2: Uncertainty and its correlates. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 53, 704715.
  • Wilson, E. J., & Sherrel, D. L. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 101112.
  • Yu, B. M. & Roh, S. Z. (2002). The effects of menu design on information seeking performance and user's attitude on the World Wide Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(11), 923933.
  • Zaichowsky, J. L. (1994). Research notes: The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 5970.