SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Albrecht, S. (2006). Whose voice is heard in online deliberation? Information, Communication & Society, 9(1), 6282.
  • Anstead, N. & O'Loughlin, B. (2011). The emerging viewertariat and BBC Question Time: Television debate and real time commenting online. Press/Politics, 16(4), 440462.
  • Awan, A. (2007). Virtual jihadist media: Function, legitimacy and radicalizing Efficacy. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(3), 389408.
  • Basu, S. (1999). Dialogic ethics and the virtue of humor. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 7(4), 378403.
  • Benhabib, S. (1992). Models of public space. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 7398). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bua, A. (2012). Agenda setting and democratic innovation: The case of the Sustainable Communities Act (2007). Politics, 32(1), 1020.
  • Calhoun, C. (Ed.). (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chambers, S. (1996). Reasonable democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 6792). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Coleman, S., & Gøtze, J. (2001). Bowling together. London: Hansard Society.
  • Dahlberg, L. (2001a). Computer-mediated communication and the public Sphere: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue1/dahlberg.html
  • Dahlberg, L. (2001b). The Habermasian public sphere encounters cyber-reality. Javnost—The Public, 8(3), 8396.
  • Davis, R. (2005). Politics online. London: Routledge.
  • Edwards, A. (2002). The moderator as an emerging democratic intermediary. Information Polity, 7(1), 320.
  • Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Freadman, A. (1994). Anyone for tennis? In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.) Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 4366). Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
  • Golder, S. A. (2003). A typology of social roles in Usenet. (Unpublished thesis). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
  • Graham, T. (2008). Needles in a haystack: A new approach for identifying and assessing political talk in nonpolitical discussion forums. Javnost - The Public, 15(2), 1736.
  • Graham, T. (2010). Talking politics online within spaces of popular culture: The case of the Big Brother forum. Javnost - The Public, 17(4), 2542.
  • Graham, T. (2012). Beyond 'political' communicative spaces: Talking politics on the Wife Swap discussion forum. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 9(1), 3145.
  • Graham, T. & Harju, A. (2011). Reality TV as a trigger of everyday political talk in the net-based public sphere. European Journal of Communication, 26(1), 1832.
  • Herring, S. C. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. The Electronic Journal of Communication 3(2). Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v3n293.htm
  • Herring, S. C., Job-Sluder, K., Scheckler, R., & Barab, S. (2002). Searching for safety online: Managing “trolling” in a feminist forum. The Information Society, 18 (5), 371383.
  • Himelboim, I., Gleave, E., & Smith, M. (2009). Discussion catalysts in online political discussions: Content importers and conversation starters. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 771789.
  • Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Huffaker, D. A. (2010). Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities. Human Communication Research, 36(4), 593617.
  • Jankowski, N. W., & Van Os, R. (2004). Internet-based political discourse. In P. Shane (Ed.), Democracy Online (pp. 181194). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Kies, R. (2010). Promises and limits of Web-deliberation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
  • Kim, A. J. (2000). Community building on the Web. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
  • Knight, J. & Johnson, J. (1994). Aggregation and deliberation. Political Theory 22(2): 27797.
  • Kuperman, V. (2006). Productivity in the Internet mailing lists. JASIST, 57(1): 5159.
  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089
  • Oldenburg, R. (1999). Great good place. New York: Marlow.
  • Preece J. (1999). Empathy online. Virtual Reality, 4(1), 111.
  • Rauch, H. (1983). Partizipation und leistung in großgruppen-sitzungen. In F. Neidhardt (Ed.), Gruppensoziologie. (pp. 256274). Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.
  • Sonnenbichler, A. C. (2010). A community membership life cycle model. Technical Report, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
  • Turner, T.C., & Fisher, K. E. (2006). The impact of social types within information communities. Proceedings of the 39th HICSS 6, 135b.
  • Welser, H. T., Gleave, E., Fisher, D., & Smith, M. (2007). Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. Journal of Social Structure, 8(2). Retrieved from http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume8/Welser/
  • Wright, S. (2006). Government-run online discussion forums: moderation, censorship and the shadow of control. British Journal of Politics and International Relation, 8(4), 550568.
  • Wright, S. (2012a). Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation. New Media and Society, 14(2), 244261.
  • Wright, S. (2012b). From “third place” to “third space”: Everyday political talk in non-political online spaces. Javnost—The Public, 19(3), 520.
  • Van Zoonen, L. (2007). Audience reactions to Hollywood politics. Media, Culture & Society, 29(4), 531547.
  • Viegas, F. B. & Smith, M. A. (2004). Newsgroup crowds and author lines: Visualizing the activity of individuals in conversational cyberspaces. Big Island, HI: IEEE.