SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7, 6477. doi:10.1108/13673270310463626
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Transl.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Barley, W. C., Leonardi, P. M., & Bailey, D. E. (2012). Engineering objects for collaboration: Strategies of ambiguity and clarity at knowledge boundaries. Human Communication Research, 38, 280308. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01430.x
  • Baxter, L. A. & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Birnholtz, J. (2010). Adopt, adapt, abandon: Understanding why some young adults start, and then stop, using instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 14271433. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.021
  • Birnholtz, J., Bi, N., & Fussell, S. (2012). Do you see that I see? Effects of perceived visibility on awareness checking behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2012) (pp. 17651774). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2207676.2208308
  • Birnholtz, J., Dixon, G., & Hancock, J. (2012). Distance, ambiguity and appropriation: Structures affording impression management in a collocated organization. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 10281035. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.005
  • Brzozowski, M. J. (2009). WaterCooler: Exploring an organization through enterprise social media. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '09) (pp. 219228). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1531674.1531706
  • Brzozowski, M. J., Sandholm, T., & Hogg, T. (2009). Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '09) (pp. 6170). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1531674.1531684
  • Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2009). Feed me: Motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2009) (pp. 945954). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1518701.1518847
  • Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346371.
  • DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121–147. doi:http://10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
  • DiMicco, J. M., & Millen, D. R. (2007). Identity management: Multiple presentations of self in Facebook. In Proceedings of the ACM 2007 International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '07) (pp. 383386). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1316624.1316682
  • DiMicco, J. M., Geyer, W., Millen, D. R., Dugan, C., & Brownholtz, B. (2009). People sensemaking and relationship building on an enterprise social network site. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2009). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2009.343
  • Eisenberg, E. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227242. doi:10.1080/03637758409390197
  • Eisenberg, E. M., & Witten, M. G. (1987). Reconsidering openness in organizational communication. Academy of Management Review, 12, 418426. doi:10.5465/AMR.1987.4306557
  • Ellison, N. B. & boyd, d. m. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Internet studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford University Press.
  • Ellison, N. B., Gibbs, J. L., & Weber, M. S. (in press). The use of enterprise social network sites for knowledge sharing in distributed organizations: The role of organizational affordances. American Behavioral Scientist.
  • Fairhurst, G. T., Jordan, J. M., & Neuwirth, K. (1997). Why are we here? Managing the meaning of an organizational mission statement. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25, 243263. doi:10.1080/00909889709365480
  • Fidelman, M. (2012, May 22). IBM study: If you don't have a social CEO, you're going to be less competitive. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/markfidelman/2012/05/22/ibm-study-if-you-dont-have-a- social-ceo-youre-going-to-be-less-competitive/
  • Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 921950. doi:10.2307/256641
  • Gibbs, J. L. (2009). Dialectics in a global software team: Negotiating tensions across time, space, and culture. Human Relations, 62, 905935. doi:10.1177/0018726709104547
  • Gibbs, J. L., Scott, C. R., Kim, Y. H., & Lee, S. K. (2010). Examining tensions in telework policies. In S. D. Long (Ed.), Communication, relationships, and practices in virtual work (pp. 125). New York: IGI Global.
  • Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451495. doi:10.2189/asqu.51.3.451
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Reading, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.
  • Hampton, K. N., Lee, C. J., & Her, E. J. (2011). How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings. New Media & Society, 13, 10311049. doi:10.1177/1461444810390342
  • Leonardi, P. M. & Treem, J. W. (2012). Knowledge management technology as a stage for strategic self-presentation: Implications for knowledge sharing in organizations. Information and Organization, 22, 3759. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.10.003
  • Leonardi, P. M., Treem, J. W., & Jackson, M. H. (2010). The connectivity paradox: Using technology to both decrease and increase perceptions of distance in distributed work arrangements. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 85105. doi:10.1080/00909880903483599
  • Lindlof, T. R. & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12030
  • Metiu, A. (2006). Owning the code: Status closure in distributed groups. Organization Science, 17, 418435. doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0195
  • Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the Tertius Iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100130. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.100
  • Olson, G. M. & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139178. doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4
  • O'Sullivan, P. B. (2000). What you don't know won't hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26, 403431. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00763.x
  • Putnam, L. L., & Boys, S. (2006). Revisiting metaphors of organizational communication. The Sage handbook of organization studies (pp. 541–576). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ramirez, Jr., A., Walther, J. B., Burgoon, J. K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research, 28, 213228. doi:10.1111/j.1468- 2958.2002.tb00804.x
  • Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J. M., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2009). Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T '09) (pp. 245254). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1556460.1556496
  • Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Tracy, S. J. (2004). Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 119146. doi:10.1080/0090988042000210025
  • Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Communication Yearbook, 36, 143189.
  • Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 25382557. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002
  • Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 115131. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
  • Westerman, C. Y. K. & Westerman, D. (2010). Supervisor impression management: Message content and channel effects on impressions. Communication Studies, 61, 585601. doi:10.1080/10510974.2010.514674