SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arpan, L., Rhodes, N., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2007). Attitude accessibility: Theory, methods, and future directions. In D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen & J. L. Monahan (Eds.), Communication and social cognition: Theories and methods (p. 351376). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., & Vallar, G. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 36(2), 233252. doi:10.1080/14640748408402157
  • Chattopadhyay, A., & Nedungadi, P. (1992). Does attitude toward the ad endure: The moderating effects of attention and delay. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 2633. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/pss/2489185
  • Courbet, D. (2000). Les effets automatiques du parrainage télévisuel sur la marque : étude de la mésattribution de la familiarité, du transfert sémantique et de l'influence des émotions déclenchées par le programme. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 15, 1, 39–62. doi: 10.1177/076737010001500103
  • Courbet, D. (2003). L'influence publicitaire en l'absence de souvenir des messages: les effets implicites de la simple exposition aux marques. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 57, 3951.
  • Edwards, S. M., Li, H., & Lee, J. H. (2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 8395.
  • Fang, X., Singh, S., & Ahluwalia, R. (2007). An examination of different explanations for the mere exposure effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 97103. doi: 10.1086/513050
  • Fazio, R. H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Research methods in personality and social psychology, Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 11, p. 7497). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Foos, P., & Goolkasian, P. (2008). Presentation format effects in a levels-of-processing task. Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 215227. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.4.215
  • Gardner, M. P., & Houston, M. J. (1986). The effects of verbal and visual components of retail communications. Journal of Retailing, 62(1), 6478.
  • Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(1), 1342.
  • Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological bulletin, 132(5), 778822. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778
  • Grimes, A., & Kitchen, P. J. (2007). Researching mere exposure effects to advertising: Theoretical foundations and methodological implications. International Journal of Market Research, 49(2), 191219.
  • Lee, A. Y. (2001). The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1255. doi:10.1177/01461672012710002
  • Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151165. doi:10.1509/jmkr.41.2.151.28665
  • Li, HR. (2011). The interactive Web: Toward a new discipline. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 1326. doi:10.2501/JAR-51-1-013-026
  • Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., & Van Zandt, B. J. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(4), 646648. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.646
  • Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., & McEvoy, C. L. (1977). Learning to order pictures and words: A model of sensory and semantic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: human learning and memory, 3(5), 485497. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.3.5.485
  • Nordhielm, C. L. (2002). The influence of level of processing on advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 371–382.
  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
  • Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: A commentary. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28(4), 373380. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.9.1043
  • Schuette, R. A., & Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitude accessibility and motivation as determinants of biased processing: A test of the MODE model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(7), 704710. doi:10.1177/0146167295217005
  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
  • Shapiro, S., & Krishnan, H. S. (2001). Memory-based measures for assessing advertising effects: A comparison of explicit and implicit memory effects. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 113.
  • Shavitt, S., & Brock, T. (1990). Delayed recall of copytest responses: The temporal stability of listed thoughts. Journal of Advertising, 19(4), 617.
  • Tavassoli, N. T. (2003). Scripted thought. In L. M. Scott & C. Batra (Eds.), Persuasive imagery: A consumer response perspective (p. 141152). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). Motormouth: mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 35(2), 423433. doi:10.1037/a0014504
  • Tulving, E. (1995). Organization of memory: Quo vadis. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (p. 839847).Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Wilson, T., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101126. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101
  • Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 9891000. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.6.989
  • Wippich, W., Melzer, A., & Mecklenbrauker, S. (1998). Picture or word superiority effects in implicit memory: Levels of processing, attention and retrieval constraints. Swiss Journal Of Psychology, 57(1), 3346.
  • Yi, Y. (1990). The effects of contextual priming in print advertisements. The Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 215222. doi:10.1086/208551
  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt.2), 1–27. doi:10.1037/h0025848
  • Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition: Studies in emotion and social interaction (p. 3158). New York: Cambridge University Press.