SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Brashers, D. E., Neidig, J. L., Haas, S. M., Dobbs, L. K., Cardillo, L. W., & Russell, J. A. (2000). Communication in the management of uncertainty: The case of persons living with HIV or AIDS. Communication Monographs, 67, 6384.
  • Bruns, A. (2008). The active audience: Transforming journalism from gatekeeping to gatewatching. In C. Paterson and D. Domingo (Eds.), Making online news: The ethnography of new media production. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Bunz, M. (January 14, 2010). In Haiti earthquake coverage, social media gives victim a voice. Retrieved January 26, 2010 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2010/jan/14/socialnetworking-haiti
  • Cronkhite, G., & Liska, J. (1976). A critique of factor analytic approaches to the study of credibility. Communication Monographs, 43, 92107.
  • DeFleur, M. L., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (1989). Theories of mass communication (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., Fang, N., Paul, J., Rangnekar, A., Shon, J., Swani, P., & Treinem, M. (2001). What makes Web sites credible? A report on a large quantitative study. In Proceedings of CHI'01, human factors in computing systems (pp. 61–68).
  • Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H., 1999, The elements of computer credibility. In Proceedings of CHI'99, human factors and computing systems, (pp. 80–87).
  • Fox, S. (May 12, 2011). The social life of health information, 2011. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project: Washington, D.C. Retrieved December 20, 2011 from http://www.pewinternet.org/˜/media//Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Social_Life_of_Health_Info.pdf
  • Greenwald, A. G., & Leavitt, C. (1985). Cognitive theory and audience involvement. In L. F. Alwitt and A. A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological process and advertising effects: Theory, research, and applications, (pp. 221240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Haas, C., & Wearden, S. T. (2003). E-credibility: Building common ground in Web environments. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 3, 169–184.
  • Heath, R. L., Liao, S., & Douglas, W. (1995). Effects of perceived economic harms and benefits on issue involvement, information use and action: A study in risk communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7, 89109.
  • Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1990). Source expertise, time of source identification, and involvement in persuasion: An elaborative processing perspective. Journal of Advertising, 19, 3039.
  • Kleck, C. A., Reese, C. A., Behnken, D. Z., & Sundar, S. S. (2007, May). The company you keep and the image you project: Putting your best face forward in online social networks. Paper presented at the 57th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
  • Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (1999). Warp speed: America in the age of mixed media. New York: Century Foundation Press.
  • Lemish, D. (1985). Soap opera viewing in college: A naturalistic inquiry. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 29, 275293.
  • Levinson, P. (2009). New new media. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Levy, M. (1987). VCR use and the concept of audience activity. Communication Quarterly, 35, 267275
  • Levy, M. R., & Windahl, S. (1984). Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11, 5178.
  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1, 540.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90103.
  • McNab, C. (2009). What social media offers to health professionals and citizens. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87, 566566.
  • Metzger, M. J., Flanagan, A. J., Eyel, K., Lemus, D. R., & McCann, R. M. (2003). Credibility in the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Communication Yearbook, 27, 293335.
  • Murch, A. W. (1971). Public concern for environmental pollution. Public Opinion Quarterly, 35, 100106.
  • O'Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory & research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • O'Reilly, T., & Battelle, J. (2009). Web squared: Web 2.0 Five years on. Retrieved February 1, 2010 from http://assets.en.oreilly.com/1/event/28/web2009_websquared-whitepaper.pdf
  • Osborne, J. W., & Waters, E. (2002). Four assumptions of multiple regression that researchers should always test. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(2). Retrieved December 20, 2011 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=2
  • Pepitone, J. (March 10, 2010). Twitter users not so social after all. CNNMoney.com. Retrieved March 14, 2010 from http://money.cnn.com/2010/03/10/technology/twitter_users_active/index.htm?hpt=Mid
  • Perloff, R. M. (1985). Personal relevance and campaign information seeking: A cognitive response-based approach. In S. Kraus & R. M. Perloff (Eds.), Mass media and political thought: An information-processing approach (pp. 177200). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Perse, E. M. (1990). Involvement with local television news: Cognitive and emotional dimensions. Human Communication Research, 16, 556581.
  • Reese, S. D., & Ballinger, J. (2001). The roots of a sociology of news: Remembering Mr. Gates and social control in the newsroom. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 641658.
  • Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (5th ed.). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  • Rubin, A. M. & Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication Research, 14, 246268.
  • Salcito, K. (2009). Online journalism ethics: Gatekeeping. Retrieved April 14, 2010 from http://www.journalismethics.ca/online_journalism_ethics/gatekeeping.htm
  • Shoemaker, P. J. & Vos, T. P. (2009). Media gatekeeping. In M. B. Salwen & D.W. Stacks (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (2nd ed.; pp. 7589). New York: Routledge.
  • Spence, P. R., Lachlan, K. A., & Griffin, D. R. (2007). Crisis communication, race and natural disasters. Journal of Black Studies, 37, 539554.
  • Spence, P. R., Westerman, D., Skalski, P. D., Seeger, M., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (2006). Gender and age effects on information seeking after 9/11. Communication Research Reports, 23, 217223.
  • Stoltenberg, C. D., & Davis, C. S. (1988). Career and study skills information: Who says what can alter message processing. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 3752.
  • Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2001). Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51, 5272.
  • Sutter, J. D. (2010, October, 29). Texts, maps battle Haiti cholera outbreak. Retrieved October, 31, 2010 from http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/innovation/10/29/haiti.cholera.tech/index.html?hpt=Sbin
  • Sutton, J., Palen, L., & Sjklovski, I. (2008). Backchannels on the front lines: Emergent uses of social media in the 2007 Southern California wildfire. In F. Friedrich and B. Van de Walle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM conference. Washington, DC.
  • Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 531549.
  • Utz, S. (2010). Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 314335.
  • Westerman, D., Spence, P. R., Van Der Heide, B. (2012). A social network as information: The effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 199206.
  • White, D. M., (1950). The “gate keeper”: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27, 383390.