SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Althaus, S. and Tewksbury, D. (2000) Patterns of internet and traditional news media use in a networked community, Political Communication 17, 2145.
  • Althaus, S. and Tewskbury, D. (2002). Agenda setting and the “new” news: Patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Communication Research, 29(2), 180207.
  • Ball-Rokeach, S. J., and Loges, W. E. (1996). Making choices: Media roles in the construction of value choices. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Power, G. J., Guthrie, K. K., and Waring, H. R. (1990). Value-framing abortion in the United States: An application of media system dependency theory. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 249273.
  • Barnett, G. and Park, H. (2005). The structure of international internet hyperlinks and bilateral bandwidth. Annals of Telecommunications, 60(9–10), 11101127.
  • Borah, P. (Forthcoming). Interactions of news frames and incivility in the political blogosphere: Examining perceptual outcomes. Political Communication.
  • Borah, P. (2012). Does it matter where you read the news stories? Interaction of incivility and news frames in the political blogosphere. Communication Research. Online First publication on June 14, 2012.
  • Borah, P. (2011a). Conceptual issues in framing: A systematic examination of a decade's literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246263.
  • Borah P. (2011b). Seeking more information and conversations: Influence of competitive frames and motivated processing. Communication Research, 38(3), 303325.
  • Brewer, P. (2002). Framing, value words, and citizens' explanations of their issue opinions. Political Communication, 19, 303316.
  • Cappella, J. and Jamieson, K. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Carrol, B. (2010). Writing for digital media. New York: Routedge.
  • Chong, D., and Druckman, J. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103126.
  • Cho, H. and Lee, J. (2008). Collaborative information seeking in intercultural computer- mediated communication groups: Testing the influence of social context using social network analysis. Communication Research, 35(4), 548573.
  • D'Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870888.
  • de Vreese, C. (2005). The spiral of cynicism reconsidered. European Journal of Communication, 20, 283301.
  • Dimitrova, D. Connolly-Ahern, C., Williams, A., Kaid, L. and Reid, A. (2003). Hyperlinking as gatekeeping: Online newspaper coverage of the execution of an American terrorist. Journalism Studies, 4(3), 401414.
  • Domke, D., Shah, D., and Wackman, D. (1998). "Moral referendums": Values, news media, and the process of candidate choice. Political Communication, 15(3), 301321.
  • Druckman, J. (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225256.
  • Druckman, J. (2004). Political preference formation: competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98(04), 671686.
  • Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 5158.
  • Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 268307.
  • Fico, F., Richardson , J.D., and Edwards , S.M. (2004). Influence of story structure on perceived story bias and news organization credibility. Mass Communication & Society, 7(3), 301318.
  • Flanagin, A. and Metzger, M. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515540.
  • Gaziano, C. (1988). How credible is the credibility crisis? Journalism Quarterly, 65, 267278.
  • Gaziano, C., and McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 451462.
  • Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Greer, J. (2003). Evaluating the credibility of online information: A test of source and advertising influence. Mass Communication and Society, 6(1), 1128.
  • Himelboim, I. (2010). The international network structure of news media: An analysis of hyperlinks usage in news web sites. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 54(3), 373390.
  • Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jacques, W and Ratzan, S. (1997) The internet's World Wide Web and political accountability: New media coverage of the 1996 presidential debates, American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 122637.
  • Johnson, T. J. and Kaye, B. K. (2004). Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the Internet influence credibility perceptions of weblogs among blog users. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 622642.
  • Johnson, K. and Wiedenback, S. (2009). Enhancing perceived credibility of citizen journalism web sites. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 332348.
  • Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263292.
  • Kim, J., Barnett, G., and Park, H. (2010). A hyperlink and issue network analysis of the United States senate: A rediscovery of the Web as a relational and topical medium. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 15981611.
  • Kiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society, 4(4), 381403.
  • Kovarick, B. (2002). Web design for the mass media. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Lee, N., McLeod, D. and Shah, D. (2008). Framing policy debates: Issue dualism, journalistic frames, and opinions on controversial policy issues. Communication Research, 35(5), 695718.
  • Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • McLeod, D. M., and Detenber, B. H. (1999). Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Communication, 49(3), 323.
  • Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R., and Mccann, R. M. (2003). Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Communication Yearbook, 27, 293335.
  • Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567588.
  • Morris, M. and Ogan, C. (1996). The Internet as a mass medium. Journal of Communication,46(1), 3950.
  • Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., and Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567583.
  • Park, H. (2002). Examining the determinants of who is hyperlinked to whom: A survey of webmasters in Korea. First Monday, 7, 114; (URL May, 2006): http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_11/park/index.html.
  • Park, H. (2003). Hyperlink network analysis: A new method for the study of social structure on the web. Connections, 25(1), 4961.
  • Park, H. and Thelwall, M. (2003). Hyperlink analysis of the World Wide Web: A review. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 8(4).
  • Peng, F. Y., Tham, N. I. and Hao, X. (1999) Trends in online newspapers: A look at the U.S. web. Newspaper Research Journal, 20(2), 5264.
  • Price, V., and Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett and F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 173212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
  • Shah, D. V., Domke, D., and Wackman, D. B. (1996). " To thine own self be true": Values, framing, and voter decision-making strategies. Communication Research, 23(5), 509560.
  • Tewksbury, D. (2003). What do Americans really want to know? Tracking the behavior of news readers on the Internet. Journal of Communication, 53(4), 694710.
  • Valentino, N., Beckmann, M. and Buhr, T. (2001) A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication 18, 34767.
  • Vargo, K., et al., (2000). How readers respond to digital news stories in layers and links, Newspaper Research Journal 21(2), 4054.
  • Wise, K. Bolls, P. and Schaefer, S. (2008). Choosing and reading online news: How available choice affects cognitive processing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(1), 6985.